So is animal leather really a “by-product” or a “co-product”, and what are the best alternatives?

nationalsalt

Active Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2024
Messages
34
Reaction score
30
I cannot seem to find an objective answer as to whether animal leather is merely repurposed waste from animals killed for their meat, or if it’s an integral part of the supply chain economy.

Figures like Stella McCartney and PETA are adamant that leather is a co-product of animal farming and that “by-product” claims are false.

The leather industry on the other hand, perhaps unsurprisingly, is adamant that animal leather is in fact a by-product, and that any claims to the contrary are false.

So what is the truth?

Secondly, there are so many leather alternatives now being made from pineapples, grapes, cork, rubber, shrimps etc. But some are apparently also mixed with / coated in plastic, which somewhat reduces their ethical / sustainable credentials.

Does anyone have experience with these and can you speak on their quality / composition?
 
Is shrimp leather more ethical than calf leather? (From a cruelty standpoint, I mean. A living creature is a living creature. A shrimp can have a rich, full, experiential life too, right? lol)

Anyway, I believe most but not all leather comes from animals who are also farmed for meat. Someone gets alligator stew, someone else gets a Ricky bag in alligator. Win win!
 
are you here trying to find content, sources, arguments, points, and answers for a school essay or article be it a university, local, national, or international newspaper or global media platform?

most of your threads appear as transparent information harvesting because you don't have the resourcefulness to find/email/call the right people irl to help you complete your writing or meet your deadline.

why are you really here on tfs?
 
are you here trying to find content, sources, arguments, points, and answers for a school essay or article be it a university, local, national, or international newspaper or global media platform?

most of your threads appear as transparent information harvesting because you don't have the resourcefulness to find/email/call the right people irl to help you complete your writing or meet your deadline.

why are you really here on tfs?

Thank you for your interest in my life, but I have no assignments due for school or work. I'm considering career options and would like to know more about various topics.

Given that this is a fashion forum, I assumed it might be the right place to ask relevant questions from people in the know. Apologies if I was mistaken.
 
if what you describe about stella, tannery, etc are right, those should be their opinions rather than truth.
one ignores, for example, bear leather and the other can say so, ignoring snakes etc.
when anyone is being adamant, there is a possibility that they are adamant with discriminating forgetfulness.

"We see subjectively, not objectively; what we are capable of seeing, not what there is to be seen. It is not wonderful that we make so many bad guesses at that prismatic thing, the truth."
alfred gardiner
 
now, for some designers, fake leather or leather is the question of effects. there can be when they think leather leaves something to be desired, when they want something else, something that feels different, like major seventh. in that situation, they can make it up artificially.
 
Across most levels of fashion, products labelled as "vegan leather" are highly likely to be polyurethane (PU), and regardless of whether you use these items to death or leave them sitting untouched on a shelf for display, any PU element starts to degrade after a while. It seems to self-destruct on an internal timer.

While research into alternative textiles is very needed, the experimental nature of these 'leathers' means I would personally be unlikely to take the risk of spending the four-figure sums usually asked by designers for their bags on any 'eco' item because of the as-yet-undefined lifespan e.g. will the novel textile be more affected by mould or mildew, will it remain stable over a decade or experience degradation of colour, texture etc?

If buying leather means I buy less, because those bags last well enough to serve their purpose for years, if not decades, I've probably reached the best compromise currently available to me, economically, ecologically and in terms of morals.
 
Across most levels of fashion, products labelled as "vegan leather" are highly likely to be polyurethane (PU), and regardless of whether you use these items to death or leave them sitting untouched on a shelf for display, any PU element starts to degrade after a while. It seems to self-destruct on an internal timer.

While research into alternative textiles is very needed, the experimental nature of these 'leathers' means I would personally be unlikely to take the risk of spending the four-figure sums usually asked by designers for their bags on any 'eco' item because of the as-yet-undefined lifespan e.g. will the novel textile be more affected by mould or mildew, will it remain stable over a decade or experience degradation of colour, texture etc?

If buying leather means I buy less, because those bags last well enough to serve their purpose for years, if not decades, I've probably reached the best compromise currently available to me, economically, ecologically and in terms of morals.

Good point re: the experimental nature of alternative textiles! That might the most sensible approach until they have been tested over time.
 
Is shrimp leather more ethical than calf leather? (From a cruelty standpoint, I mean. A living creature is a living creature. A shrimp can have a rich, full, experiential life too, right? lol)

Anyway, I believe most but not all leather comes from animals who are also farmed for meat. Someone gets alligator stew, someone else gets a Ricky bag in alligator. Win win!

Good point - they seem to be marketing shrimp leather as a true by-product of the seafood industry made from discarded shells, but I guess this is the same argument the cow leather industry uses.

On the plus side, one of the shrimp leather companies claims it is totally plastic-free, unlike some of the grape / pineapple etc. alternatives.
 
im not spending anything more than 10$ on fake leather or fake fur. no alternatives, tanneries have a rich history and culture which should continue. Same for furriers. seems fashion designers are starting to be lab grown as well with the amount of boring and lifeless collections being made, this is the real issue. Good leathers going to the hands of ancora guy or kim jones.
 
im not spending anything more than 10$ on fake leather or fake fur. no alternatives, tanneries have a rich history and culture which should continue. Same for furriers. seems fashion designers are starting to be lab grown as well with the amount of boring and lifeless collections being made, this is the real issue. Good leathers going to the hands of ancora guy or kim jones.
This. Brands changing real fur and leather for some plastic bullsh*t yet charging the same prices.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,077
Messages
15,171,643
Members
85,898
Latest member
freaknore
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->