^I don't quite see what are the historical inaccuracies people keep referring to. The end of the movie show M-A and her husband fleeing Versailles, which did happened.
Coppola choose to not treat the trial and beheading stuff, which was wise both on an artistic point of view (as it would not have fit with the mood and the purpose of the movie), and on a practical point of view, since this period was so rich in event and so complex it deserves its own full length feature.
Overall I loved the movie, and I am definitely buying the DVD.
However be warned it's pure Coppola. If you think she's just a talentless poseur who spawn boring movies, run, you'll hate it!
Coppola choose to not treat the trial and beheading stuff, which was wise both on an artistic point of view (as it would not have fit with the mood and the purpose of the movie), and on a practical point of view, since this period was so rich in event and so complex it deserves its own full length feature.
Overall I loved the movie, and I am definitely buying the DVD.
However be warned it's pure Coppola. If you think she's just a talentless poseur who spawn boring movies, run, you'll hate it!
(Incidentally, I have a feeling that the dissapointment may be over the fact that Fraser's biography is not a condemnation of Marie-Antoinette. It does not indulge in the popular myths of her stupidity etc and instead tries to portray its subject with historical accuracy. That isn't to say that she excuses Antoinette's excesses, Fraser simply shows her as she was: frivolous, but ultimately not the callously stupid person that people take her to be)


.


. People kept promising to see it but never did.

































