Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette | Page 15 | the Fashion Spot

Sofia Coppola's Marie Antoinette

There is no way that this movie could be used as a historical source in regards to the French Revolution, but I don’t think it was Soffia Coppola’s intention to make it that. I think she wanted to convey to people the lavish and extravagant lifestyle of the French court under the Ancien Regime and the changes that the Revolution bought, and I think she did that very well! I loved the beautiful clothes, the breathtaking scenes she decided to use and just the brilliance of colour. I cringe a little bit at the inaccuracies, but that is only because I am much more familiar with the events of the French Revolution than the average film-goer, since I’m intensely studying the French Revolution one part of one of my subjects.
Marie Antoinette never did say “Let them eat cake” when she saw her impoverished subjects outside the protective walls of Versailles, instead, she is recorded as saying "It is quite certain that in seeing the people who treat us so well despite their own misfortune, we are more obliged than ever to work hard for their happiness." A far cry from “Let them eat cake”! It was so unfair for what Marie Antoinette was blamed for! It was not her fault that she didn’t give the Louis XVI a son until 7 years into their marriage! She was not involved in the Diamond Necklace Affair- she tried to change her ways and cut back her extravagant lifestyle, but no one took notice of that because people were too convinced of all her wrongly accused crimes to the French people and country, known as the "Madame Deficit" and “l'autrichienne”. Sure, she was strongly religious and therefore opposed the Civil Constitution of the Clergy of 179, was a stringent believer in absolute monarchy and scornful of the democratic principles of the revolution which emerged in 1789, but peoples’ prejudice was already deep set just by the fact she was Austrian, the natural enemy of France. :(

Erm. Ok. Sorry. I’ll stop my rant here.
 
I think it was really great. It was a historical portray, that was made so extremely different from others! Of course its not really so much about the history but the style of the movie is so artistic and you get such a better idea of the extravagance! I Love it!!
 
Loved it
(especially the part with the hidden converse, so brilliant!!)
If you want historical drama, "this is what happened, and how it happened" then of course this movie sucks, but if you want a fun, colourful movie then this is absolutely worth it :D
 
There is no way that this movie could be used as a historical source in regards to the French Revolution, but I don’t think it was Soffia Coppola’s intention to make it that. I think she wanted to convey to people the lavish and extravagant lifestyle of the French court under the Ancien Regime and the changes that the Revolution bought, and I think she did that very well! I loved the beautiful clothes, the breathtaking scenes she decided to use and just the brilliance of colour. I cringe a little bit at the inaccuracies, but that is only because I am much more familiar with the events of the French Revolution than the average film-goer, since I’m intensely studying the French Revolution one part of one of my subjects.
Marie Antoinette never did say “Let them eat cake” when she saw her impoverished subjects outside the protective walls of Versailles, instead, she is recorded as saying "It is quite certain that in seeing the people who treat us so well despite their own misfortune, we are more obliged than ever to work hard for their happiness." A far cry from “Let them eat cake”! It was so unfair for what Marie Antoinette was blamed for! It was not her fault that she didn’t give the Louis XVI a son until 7 years into their marriage! She was not involved in the Diamond Necklace Affair- she tried to change her ways and cut back her extravagant lifestyle, but no one took notice of that because people were too convinced of all her wrongly accused crimes to the French people and country, known as the "Madame Deficit" and “l'autrichienne”. Sure, she was strongly religious and therefore opposed the Civil Constitution of the Clergy of 179, was a stringent believer in absolute monarchy and scornful of the democratic principles of the revolution which emerged in 1789, but peoples’ prejudice was already deep set just by the fact she was Austrian, the natural enemy of France. :(

Erm. Ok. Sorry. I’ll stop my rant here.

I understand how you feel! Marie Antoinette was actually something of an altruist. I believe it's on record that she once denied her children Christmas gifts because it was a harsh year for France's economy (and wanted to be fair to her subjects).

Personally I hated the movie, even historical inaccuracies aside (I'm not really a history buff, so it honestly doesn't matter to me!). I just didn't find it interesting. I loved the clothes and shoes, but they weren't enough to redeem what I considered an extremely boring plot. I also read an article that said the movie reflected on Sofia Coppola's own obsession with material possessions and shallow "beauty" - to which I have to maybe agree.
 
I think you either love it or you hate it.Sofia's movies all tend to have a slow pace to them, but it doesn't bother me because as long as it keeps my attention I will keep watching.
 
I think you either love it or you hate it.Sofia's movies all tend to have a slow pace to them, but it doesn't bother me because as long as it keeps my attention I will keep watching.
Spot on! It's all subjective. And the world would be boring if everyone agreed. ;)
 
Marie Antoinette is one of the most beautiful movies i've ever seen. The wardrobe, the places (Versailles), all the atmosphere is just perfect and that's why it is after all, a visual movie. Like Lost in Translation, Marie Antoinette is that kind of movie that you can pause everywhere and it shows a beautiful photo/scene.
 
It's so beautiful at times... It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside
 
There is no way that this movie could be used as a historical source in regards to the French Revolution, but I don’t think it was Soffia Coppola’s intention to make it that. I think she wanted to convey to people the lavish and extravagant lifestyle of the French court under the Ancien Regime and the changes that the Revolution bought, and I think she did that very well! I loved the beautiful clothes, the breathtaking scenes she decided to use and just the brilliance of colour. I cringe a little bit at the inaccuracies, but that is only because I am much more familiar with the events of the French Revolution than the average film-goer, since I’m intensely studying the French Revolution one part of one of my subjects.
Marie Antoinette never did say “Let them eat cake” when she saw her impoverished subjects outside the protective walls of Versailles, instead, she is recorded as saying "It is quite certain that in seeing the people who treat us so well despite their own misfortune, we are more obliged than ever to work hard for their happiness." A far cry from “Let them eat cake”! It was so unfair for what Marie Antoinette was blamed for! It was not her fault that she didn’t give the Louis XVI a son until 7 years into their marriage! She was not involved in the Diamond Necklace Affair- she tried to change her ways and cut back her extravagant lifestyle, but no one took notice of that because people were too convinced of all her wrongly accused crimes to the French people and country, known as the "Madame Deficit" and “l'autrichienne”. Sure, she was strongly religious and therefore opposed the Civil Constitution of the Clergy of 179, was a stringent believer in absolute monarchy and scornful of the democratic principles of the revolution which emerged in 1789, but peoples’ prejudice was already deep set just by the fact she was Austrian, the natural enemy of France. :(

Erm. Ok. Sorry. I’ll stop my rant here.

Great post:flower:

I have been obsessed with Marie Antoinette for many many years and have read and studied alot about her.

The "let them eat cake" line has also been linked to two other princesses and was in a book some 200 years before Marie Antoinette was even born.:rolleyes:
 
Marie Antoinette is one of the most beautiful movies i've ever seen. The wardrobe, the places (Versailles), all the atmosphere is just perfect and that's why it is after all, a visual movie. Like Lost in Translation, Marie Antoinette is that kind of movie that you can pause everywhere and it shows a beautiful photo/scene.

I agree; the plot leaves a lot to be desired in my opinion, but it's definitely very aesthetically pleasing and you can indulge all the senses when you watch it with the beautiful dresses, good music and gorgeous food!
And of course, I love Kirsten..

sweetpop, wow, thanks! That was really informative. I'm really interested in the French Revolution at the moment so I enjoyed reading your post.
 
I can sum the movie up in two words: Eye Candy

:) I love the visuals, and it doesn't matter if it lacks a plot or historical accuracy, no? When it's an image that takes my breath away, I enjoy it very much.
 
I can sum the movie up in two words: Eye Candy

Exactly! This movie is so so very pretty! The colors and clothing and Versailles and just everything.
Are tourists allowed to go into the palace of Versailles?
It is my dream right now to visit France and see this beautiful palace :blush:
 
^^ Yes, Versailles is open to the public. :flower:
It's even more amazing in real life than it is in the movie, one can really feel the 'history' of the place..
 
ooh thanks! :flower: So you've been there?
I dream about that place, I want to go see it so badly!
Do you know if cameras are allowed there?
 
One of my favorite movies I saw it twice in theaters and have watched it at least 4 times on dvd. I was trying to figure out why Jamie Dornan, count fersen, looked familiar and I figured out that it is because he was a Calvin Klein model and did Dior Homme campaign.
 
Yes, I was there earlier this year. Cameras are allowed everywhere at Versailles as far as I can remember, I took hundreds of pictures ^_^
 
Love this movie, I thought the soundtrack was amazing too, like when they play siouxsie and the banshees at the Ball-scene
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,293
Messages
15,295,019
Members
89,236
Latest member
ooh la la mi mi
Back
Top