T Magazine Summer Entertainment Issue 2016 : Natalie Portman by Craig McDean | the Fashion Spot
  • Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

T Magazine Summer Entertainment Issue 2016 : Natalie Portman by Craig McDean

zzzyao76

Active Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
4,748
Reaction score
88
13-T-Summer-Entertainment-Cover.w632.h948.jpg

nymag.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
what the hell is that styling? :lol:
I like her expression though...
 
Natalie!!!

I have missed seeing her on covers. And in films, really. Seems like she's a step back over the past couple of years.

She's looking more mature on this cover, more into her age - less baby-faced. It's a good look on her. She's utterly beautiful! Reminding me of Rachel Weiss a bit here.
 
She kind of looks like she's dying, and that weirdly naked hip isn't helping. It's such an odd shot.
 
I actually laughed out loud when I saw this. She looks both ill and quite pissed off. I would be too if I was forced to wear a massive, ill-fitting sweater that stylist must've picked up at an Estate sale, paired with a gingham bikini bottom.
 
She looks miserable.
 
She was definitely sucking in her cheeks here. Maybe that's why she looks pissed off - her face is sore!

T missed it this time
 
It's great to see her but I'm not sure about her facial expression..
 
Natalie is eternally gorgeous to me. And amazing to see her mature into such a sultry woman.

But this cover's styling is just so misdirected. The whimsy, and Lolita playful/sexy/teasing styling of a pair of gingham G-string with the woolly turtleneck doesn't gel well with her serious face. Perhaps a skirt slit waist high would have been more... alluring.

(Still loathe that awful drop-shadow on the "T"...)
 
I hate her pose on the cover, ruins in. Let's see the editorial will be better.
 
Natalie!!!

I have missed seeing her on covers. And in films, really. Seems like she's a step back over the past couple of years.

She's looking more mature on this cover, more into her age - less baby-faced. It's a good look on her. She's utterly beautiful! Reminding me of Rachel Weiss a bit here.

Yesssss I miss her too! I think she looks so good and professional on prints. She was busy directing a movie in Israel and filming Jacky which I think will get a lot of press next year. But I'm wondering what she's promoting here though...
 
I'm not sure what made me want to poke my eyes out more, the styling of this editorial or the pretentious interview.
 
I'm not sure what made me want to poke my eyes out more, the styling of this editorial or the pretentious interview.

:lol: You've read it? God, so nauseating and insular. It was a great idea, but they chose the wrong people for this. I imagine it was intended as some sort of insightful and unrehearsed glance into what she's all about. Only, Natalie is as ostentatious with her intellectualism as Kim Kardashian is with her shamelessness.

Behold.....

Do you remember how in the ’90s there was this sort of “sad girl chic”? Like “Reviving Ophelia” and Fiona Apple, and just a lot of sad, beautiful girls. And it felt like being deep or interesting or even attractive was being a little sullen, to use Ms. Apple’s word (whom I love by the way). And then living in France, I got the same ’90s sense, that there’s a beauty there culturally associated with sadness.

:rolleyes: She's of course referring to Gallic gloom here, albeit in a insultingly superficial way.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,517
Messages
15,265,053
Members
88,582
Latest member
arjaaaine
Back
Top