The Official Men's Magazine Thread | Page 435 | the Fashion Spot

The Official Men's Magazine Thread

Pop culture, particularly reality TV, is trashy all over the world, from the UK to South Korea. Why single out the US? Certainly not all Basketball players are the same. If you don't follow sports closely, the only way you'd even know about them is through scandal or pop culture or just because of their unerring excellence. There are hundreds of NBA players whose names you likely don't know, so why make such a sweeping generalization? Is Steph Curry trashy? He's one of America's biggest Basketball stars and has been on GQ. Same with LeBron James, Kevin Love, etc.

No, it’s not just (sex) scandal that puts these ballers/athletes on the public conscious; it’s the criminal acts-- from dogfightings, outrageously arrested development behaviour, to drive-by shootings. And these acts somehow are glamourized by some (both in outside and inside the institution) as signs of their earned alpha-power and idealized leadership. Of course athletes all around the world are not the same, but they’re also undeservingly celebrated as heroes and role models for outdated reasons for so many impressionable people. Americans in general put such a weird emphasis on these men— especially a lifestyle and fashion magazine as GQ: So what if someone can dribble a ball well, or throw a ball powerfully, or run really really fast???? Good for them for possessing such a skill that gives them ultimate passport to multi-millionaire-status, but other than that ability and an impressive bank account, why anyone would find them admirable is rather stunted and beyond me. So aside from putting their names on coveted kicks that has some kidz shooting each other up for, I’d wish these people would think beyond making another 20 million off endorsements on top of their already inflated contracts. But I guess that effort only comes with time, age and experience— so someone like Mike Tyson, who has the experience of all that, finally became someone worth listening to.

Yes, that goes for anyone that seem to think a fashion model is worthy of admiration or inspiration beyond doing their job. None of them— fashion models nor ballers, are deserving of being so admired and revered.

And yes, ballers endorse that trashy, nouveau-riche way of life that is as tacky as the Versace has come to symbolize of high fashion.
 
Well you've turned a gross generalization targeting "ballers" specifically into a larger statement about who we revere. Applying the same level of judgement across the board, who should be on GQ? Should they wear designer clothing and accessories? Should magazines like GQ exist at all, since they glorify conspicuous consumption and sometimes illegal behavior? Just seems like broad, useless statements. Why is physical prowess (which requires hard work and sacrifice to maintain) less deserving of wealth than a natural knack for business, a talent for singing, a mind for writing, or creative spirit? Seems to me like you're writing these people off as dumb thugs, based on the actions of a few. Why the snobbery? Concerning whether "ballers" are worse than the rest of us, consider that there are thousands of them, past and present, and how many have been murders, been involved in dogfighting, etc. There are countless other headlines, stories of athletes who give back to their communities, who teach kids about dedication and hard work and resilience and pride. If those athletes don't get the same level of attention that speaks to society have the wrong focus, but it would seem you're a willing participant in that misdirected focus. There are some bad apples to be sure, but is the percentage so far off from the overall statistics of adults who engage in illegal activities? Particularly wealthy and/or powerful adults? Athletes have been revered for thousands of years, the rich and powerful have behaved badly for thousands of years. I don't get your particular bone to pick with American "ballers".
 
^^^ Famous multi-millionaire ballers being judged, generalized and dismissed as conspicuous perpetrators of trashy, mass consumerism doesn’t cancel out their supposedly, possible humanitarian and generous acts. Gaultier remains one of my fav design visionaries, but there’s no denying he has an extended campy, trashy trail to his work. His once TV show was even called Eurotrash… Nothing wrong with owning one’s trashy side— nor admitting someone you may admire is as inspiring as they are trashy.

I’ve learned very early on working for rich rich rich employers that financial wealth doesn’t necessarily equate a wealth of superior intellect, refinement, and definitely not a wealth of kindness nor generosity. So no, I don’t give any CEO of a successful entity a pass either. They can be as tacky and trashy as these ballers and the Versaces— just that they’re not famous, so their trashiness isn’t going to reach that many impressionable people.

Even hardcore gangbangers can have genuinely good hearts and be dedicated parents and leaders of their communities; does that mean I shouldn’t be critical of their thug life because they’re such caring parents????

Call it gross snobbery, call it gross elitism, call it gross cynicism, call it whatever you’d like and I’m fine with such accusations. I just don’t care for the glorification of and glamourizing athletes (along with any idol worship, whether they be a singer, designer, model, gods etc)— which is nothing more than another branch off of the good ol’ boys club in terms of how they depict their lifestyle.

American GQ is a creative void to anyone who remotely may be interested in high fashion, let alone anyone who has an opinion on fashion. They weren’t always such a trashy void as they are now.
 
GQ Australia May 2018

D3X61Cut_o.jpg


There's Just Something About Harry
Ph: Mary McCartney
Styling: Harry Lambert
Grooming: Lou Teasdale
Musician: Harry Styles



Australian GQ May 2018 Digital Edition
 
US Esquire May 2018

Classic Cool at Any Age
Photographer: Guy Aroch
Stylist: Caroline Christiansson
Grooming: Benjamin Thigpen
Models: ?


US Esquire Digital Edition
 
UK Esquire May 2018

Up and Then Down
Photographer: Ash Reynolds
Stylist: Catherine Hayward
Grooming: Paul Donovan
Model: Sid Ellisdon


UK Esquire Digital Edition
 
Esquire Spain May 2018

Aires Del Oeste
Photographer: Pablo Sáez
Stylist: Álvaro de Juan
Grooming: Daniel Rull
Model: Will Chalker


Esquire Spain Digital Edition
 
Esquire Spain May 2018

Print Way
Photographer: Onin Lorente
Stylist: Patrick Lief
Grooming: Meltem Sahin
Model: Jemal J. Etne


Esquire Spain Digital Edition
 
GQ Australia May 2018

Your New Trans-seasonal Wardrobe
Photographer: Tim Ashton
Stylist: Olivia Harding
Hair: Cain Ireland
Makeup: Joel Phillips
Model: Hamish Steed


GQ Australia Digital Edition
 
Last edited by a moderator:
GQ Australia May 2018

Tommy Boy
Photographer: Tim Ashton
Stylist: Olivia Harding
Hair: Madison Voloshin
Makeup: Joel Phillips
Model: Samuel Barrie


GQ Australia Digital Edition
 
GQ Australia May 2018

History Repeated
Photographer: Jesse Lizotte
Stylist: Olivia Harding
Model: Jordan Barrett


GQ Australia Digital Edition
 
British GQ June 2018

Waver Voom
Styling: Luke Day
Photographer: Doug Inglish


Digital Edition
 
Numéro Homme Thailand April-May 2018 covers by Bigs Vatcharasith



From Numero Thailand's instagram
 
Attitude - May 2018

Editorial: "V Is For Vitor"
Photographer: Elias Tahan
Fashion Editor: Joseph Kocharian
Hair/Make Up: Michelle Harvey
Model: Vitor Melo





Attitude Digital Edition
 
^Me too! I came across this on Instagram earlier and thought it was GENIUS! It's obviously a spoof of the Photoshop blunders on Vanity Fair's 2018 Hollywood cover by Annie Leibovitz, which was indeed an absolute laughingstock. Major kudos, GQ!
 
Oh! I love it! First GQ magazine that I have really loved this year.

I would have added Tiffany Haddish to the line up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,354
Messages
15,298,616
Members
89,324
Latest member
Bertrim
Back
Top