The Official Men's Magazine Thread

[Gary101]

GQ UK March 2010 - Anne Hathaway



Ebay UK

 

[sarehak]

That's a nice cover. It's a little too risqué for my personal tastes, & I prefer seeing Anne in a more classier or subdued manner but she's beautiful of course so I can ignore it somewhat.

 

[IAmLordZen]

↑ That's a pretty interesting cover! I like how inviting it appears to be. Love the play of colors too.

 

[jeremydante]

anne looks good; but the cover is still boring. why not put a man on GQ?

 

[Katnani]

Anne for GQ, that should be interesting...

 

[IAmLordZen]

Men being the target demographic, I guess sexy pinup images of women would sell more.

 

[honeycombchild]

Her eds got a bit of a seventies vibe to be bits of it. Big hat, high waisted shorts... it's nice though, and I do like the cover, however it does worry me how much of her boob is actually out of the corset on the cover! To me it looks like there's been some Nipple Photoshopping action going on!

 

[Flashbang]

^I'm actually stared the chest area quite awhile to realize there's something wrong with it.

And the 'ZOMG UNWRAPPED..BARES ALL' sentence is an overkill.

 

[homeboy]

anne looks good; but the cover is still boring. why not put a man on GQ?

Because the number of male celebrities worthy of a cover are few, while there is an ocean full of female stars. Most importantly, men are men, and thus, a cover featuring a beautiful actress will always entice even the most distant readers to flick through an issue.

 

[tigerrouge]

anne looks good; but the cover is still boring. why not put a man on GQ?

French GQ seems to have a man on the front nearly every month, although their choices don't tend to be as easy on the eye as most models and actresses. I think the last French GQ with a girl on the front was a Gisele cover from some time ago.

 

[clo]

Anna is not the kind of woman I would think I'd see on the cover of GQ but she looks surprisingly good. Have to agree with jeremydante, why not put a man on the cover?

 

[Annu]

thesuperficial.com

 

[IAmLordZen]

SLURP March 2010.

thefashionisto

 

[McQueezy]

I love Slurp, I just wish I could afford it

 

[Festat]

Travis dressed is quite a rare thing to see.

 

[IAmLordZen]

I don't get the point Slurp's trying to make (as a magazine)

 

[montrealm]

That Givenchy shirt on the Slup's cover feel so dated or over used, but I guess regular reader doesnt know that.

 

[Flashbang]

Preview of Robert Pattinson Details photoshoot. I don't mind if it's the cover though.

eclipsemovie.org

 

[Ecstasy Lover]

I love Slurp, I just wish I could afford it

I love it too, but it's really expensive. I prefer buying three other magazines instead of that.

Don't like this cover, btw. The previous ones with Lars and Sean were much better.

 

[IAmLordZen]

↑ So far the best cover RPatz did was for the April 09 issue of US GQ. That picture above looks ugly. Bad lighting, bad angle, bad shot in general.

BTW, how much does Slurp cost anyway? I'm curious... The most expensive magazine I plan on buying is Numero Homme F/W 09 and it will cost me $32.00 including shipping. Still thinking about it though.