tigerrouge
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2005
- Messages
- 18,897
- Reaction score
- 9,746
When I started to read the book, I was approaching it in a half-discouraged mindset, due to the amount of hype that's always surrounded this work, and given that the first real character that we're introduced to is Tomas, that didn't improve matters for me.
However, when it got to the stage where the book was looking at the same events but through the eyes of different characters, then I began to enjoy it, because of the layers of interpretation.
But for all the formal talk about philosophy, I felt that an important idea was being expressed through the death of the dog, which was the most emotionally moving part of the entire novel.
When Kundera writes about the "true moral test" being our attitude towards animals, it's almost as if he's bringing the book to a close by putting us through this experience of the dog's death, to remind us that we're capable of passing this test and caring in a pure way. And if we can care about the death of a fictional dog, then we are capable of going out into the world and caring in some small way about the fate of other people, even though relationships are based on mistrust and self-deception.
However, when it got to the stage where the book was looking at the same events but through the eyes of different characters, then I began to enjoy it, because of the layers of interpretation.
But for all the formal talk about philosophy, I felt that an important idea was being expressed through the death of the dog, which was the most emotionally moving part of the entire novel.
When Kundera writes about the "true moral test" being our attitude towards animals, it's almost as if he's bringing the book to a close by putting us through this experience of the dog's death, to remind us that we're capable of passing this test and caring in a pure way. And if we can care about the death of a fictional dog, then we are capable of going out into the world and caring in some small way about the fate of other people, even though relationships are based on mistrust and self-deception.

. There was something about it that I just didn't like and I'm sorry guys but I will finish the next one, I promise. It was very well written but there wasn't an ounce of joy or humour anywhere in the book which made it sort of hard to read on and there didn't feel like a flow anywhere. Not one funny line or moment where anyone was enjoying their life or themselves - not even in the love scenes
. For me that part of the book gets pretty boring pretty fast. I didn't even like Tomas or Tereza or Sabina or Franz. Also, the author is too much in my opinion and trying to be the new Plato or something because there is always an explanation in this book which gets annoying.


A Farewell to Arms