this thread reminded me of the Unseen Vogue book, published back in the early 00s. while there are some images with obvious defects here (technical or aesthetical), it'd be interesting to learn why some of the most beautiful images were dismissed.
US Vogue October 2008
Natural High Models: Anna J, Caroline Trentini, Coco Rocha, Lily Donaldson Photographer: Steven Meisel Fashion Editor: Marie-Amelie Sauve
I can see why the first shot as not used, most of the editorial displays natural looking furs, yet that one would be the only one with color,
and the editorial IS called Natural High.
But I'm not sure why the last shot was not used,
maybe they only had a certain amount of pages that could be used.
Daria looks great in that shot. I prefer the cover shot they used though.
Just saw the Eugenia picture for the first time, that is brutal, must have been so upsetting for her.
I have a bunch to post; i don't have all the info about the shoot they are from, if you can add info, please do. And the same if i post a pic that was actually published. All from trunkarchive.
Vogue US November 2003
Karen Elson and Elise Crombez.
ph.arthur_elgort
American Splendor
HARPER'S BAZAAR USA 12/1994 "BRINGING UP BABY"
Kristen McMenamy
Patrick Demarchelier
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.