MissMagAddict
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 26,630
- Reaction score
- 1,309
I hope I get the Emily Blunt cover!
i don't know... her arms look so strange.
I know what you mean, and i actually agree, but you cant deny that she is a very high profiled celebrity that will shift copies, and that is every editors goal. These covers are a perfect example of how magazines go for a face (read; name!) that will sell over someone else that is guaranteed to bring something more creative to the table, sad, but its business.Why oh why did they pick Katie Holmes for the cover? Because she's the bigger star, of course (did I just answer my own question? ).
But really, it annoys me. Julianne, Renée, Zoe and Emily's covers were so much better! I especially loved Emily's. It was the same issue for AnOther Magazine. Four covers for four celebrities representing the decade in style, and they pick Katie Holmes!
Either that or she's handcuffedIf I bought that magazine, I would have a hard time resisting the urge to pick up my pens and draw in some accessories.
She looks like she's got a surprise for us. Now I've become suspicious of her. I don't like surprises. She has a look in her eye, like it won't be nice.