birdyandme
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2008
- Messages
- 2,051
- Reaction score
- 1
I don't really like the cover shot.....odd pose, and the hair is a bit weird?
BUT, as i said in Kate's thread, i'm excited to see her on a cover.
The inside images are gorgeous!
Harper's often choose cover shots of her with odd expressions i've noticed.
Her 2003 cover was stunning, as was the shot with Cameron in 2007.
But the others have all had something a little bit weird going on in the face.
Almost as though they've used the image that was one shutter click away from the good one.
Still I love the relationship she has with Harper's. She always produces beautiful photoshoots with them.
Her 2004 subscriber cover is one of my all time favourites!
BUT, as i said in Kate's thread, i'm excited to see her on a cover.
The inside images are gorgeous!
Harper's often choose cover shots of her with odd expressions i've noticed.
Her 2003 cover was stunning, as was the shot with Cameron in 2007.
But the others have all had something a little bit weird going on in the face.
Almost as though they've used the image that was one shutter click away from the good one.
Still I love the relationship she has with Harper's. She always produces beautiful photoshoots with them.
Her 2004 subscriber cover is one of my all time favourites!
Last edited by a moderator:

, she's managed to be so professional to the point that she inspires (at least in me) what an architect or a musician inspires, I don't care in the least bit who they hang out with, how much they love their partners, what they think of Chanel's bags or how they've found a new diet or city to rave about.. you only gain satisfaction when you see them in full performance.. that's why it's always perplexing for me why they keep giving her so many covers, I know it's all PR but.. I just don't think that talking about her style or lifestyle is necessary, at all... but maybe she wants to, oh well..



