US Harper's Bazaar March 2011 : Kim Kardashian by Terry Richardson | Page 2 | the Fashion Spot

US Harper's Bazaar March 2011 : Kim Kardashian by Terry Richardson

how kim gets saddled with fashion magazines is beyond me. she isn't very particularly well known outside America and she rarely does something other than promote and talk about herself -- all her incessant prattle about 'empowering women' by being plus size and her endless complaints about posing naked but she goes ahead and does it anyway. aren't her 15 minutes up already? pleasssseeee!

Good job she's on an American magazine cover then...

There is such a large pool of actresses that could have been used that are popular at the moment like Jennifer Lawrence, Mila Kunis, Olivia Wilde, Zoe Saldana, Anna Paquin, Rebecca Hall, Emily Blunt. Yet they put this botoxed creature on the cover?

Kim will sell way more issues than any of those girls could.
 
looks like a christmas cover, but I like it anyways, anything Christmas is ok except during Christmas time...
 
Are magazines that desperate to sell? I wouldn't be surprised if we see her on Vogue US soon. :yuk:

Of course they are? They are a business after all. No-one's doing it solely for the fun and joy of fashion really.

I don't feel particular hate for Kim, but I certainly don't care for her. I'll still buy the issue, but I have no interest in reading her article or seeing any images from that awful editorial again. But I get why she's on there. Sales figures for the March issue. It was pretty widely known that GaGa had Vogue so they had to go with someone they felt could sell well for them too.
 
Oh hell no. Although I do have to admit, she looks great as Cleopatra.
 
Blah...she's hot and Terry can go interesting even for Bazaar but this looks tamer than the cover of 'Good Housekeeping' or something.

That Cleopatra close-up is just a joke too...
 
Can someone just fire Glenda already? First Miley, now Kim. Who's next? Snooki?
 
I am so upset!!! They could have styled Kim completely different!!! What in the world is going on at Bazaar? Did everyone agree that they didn't want their most important issue to sell? I'm soooo lost:blink:
 
The cover is nice enough I suppose, and Kim looks pretty, but I have just about given up with this magazine. Everything about it had gone seriously downhill and then some. I can't even be arsed to look at the contents anymore, and having Kim on the cover has just about knocked the nail in the coffin for me. She is so uninteresting.
 
I really like it! When I saw the title on the forum, I thought OMG! No! She'll be over-photoshoped but I don´t really think that when I looked at the cover.
 
Ugly cover and taste she in the cover so cheap
 
Good job she's on an American magazine cover then...

yeah, i forgot US Bazaar isn't sold anywhere else but the states.

haha if they were so desperate for sales they could've played up with kim's sl*tty image or, even better, got her naked on the editorial and called it 'artsy' and 'tasteful' and THEN it would really sell. surprised terry seemed to tone the sexuality down here when he could have taken it to all new heights.
 
I have officially lost faith in our society. How do you go from Nicole Kidman to that?
 
Bad cover, terrible editorial.... just a waste of space with her on the cover.

I wish Prince could come & kick her off the cover like he kicked her off the stage for not dancing Monday night.
 
This is a magazine that used to compete with Vogue... right? :lol:
 
Taking a look at the bigger image, Kim must be the only person whose face can appear less airbrushed on a magazine cover than it does in a candid shot. The hands look like they belong to someone human as well... but underneath, everything's been turned into unreality, as if she's a flesh-coloured cardboard cut-out below the chin. Ah well. I'll not complain about it being red, nor the sight of so much hair.
 
I have officially lost faith in our society.

it's only now you have lost faith in society? :o^_^ with the whole reality tv debacle my faith went a long time ago when the likes of her and co are given the go ahead to appear on tv/magazine covers and SELL more magazines than the people with ACTUAL TALENT you know society has gone to the gutters.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,425
Messages
15,301,935
Members
89,420
Latest member
valenc1974
Back
Top