I am also able to see a splash of Paolo Roversi's work too, yet despite not being a huge Roversi fan, I'm not complaining. The two covers are great, especially the second. It's a pleasure to see Naomi partaking in a shoot which was more than an ounce of creativity.
It looks like a must-have issue. They have a legendary supermodel shot by a local photographer
whose works have been published globally. It's also 400+ pages thick, which is surprising because
their November issues had the least amount of pages during -ber months in the past.
Both are beautiful covers. I can also see Roversi's work as well as Porodina's, but less saturated.
I love Cho Gi-Seok's work. he is a very creative and talented photographer. I think these certain covers are different from his usual work. his pictures are always surreal and abstract, it's his typical signature but he did great work and I like both covers.
I can't believe I'm going to say this but WITH ANOTHER MODEL and someone not as retouched in the face as her and WITH ACTUAL POSING SKILLS then yes, I would have bought into this editorial.
My goshhhh she's so so so heavily retouched but not digitally speaking : cosmetically. Why has she and Linda done so so much to alter their actual beauty??? I mean we all know why but it's not good. They wanted to remain as young as ever but Cindy / Claudia / Christy and other supermodels still look great but they haven't gone crazy with their surgeries.
AND I would like for Naomi to actually pose. She keeps doing a Kendall LOL she has done much better than that in her heydays.
Can't believe I said ALL OF THAT about a supermodel but I have to call a cat a cat lol.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.