Vogue Mexico & Latin America January 2016 : Emily DiDonato by David Roemer

[Bobby153]

Instagram.com/dailyemilydidonato

So excited for this.

 

[Deleted member 45369]

Imo Emily is much more suited for commercial stuff than high fashion. I could see her booking an SI cover and becoming rich and famous but I don't buy her as a high fashion model.

 

[Bobby153]

Imo Emily is much more suited for commercial stuff than high fashion. I could see her booking an SI cover and becoming rich and famous but I don't buy her as a high fashion model.

I get where you're coming from, there's no doubt she has the look to be a very successful commercial model, VS could have launched her into a household name but for whatever reason they won't take her but an SI cover would be awesome. As a fan though I was personally like seeing her pop up in high fashion.

She has delivered some great high fashion eds, her VP jewellery ed and her numero one a few years back spring to mind.

 

[dfl-001]

I like Emily and I like the preview here.
I think she's good in high fashion.
This type of cross over ( high fashion and commercial; SI or VS) goes way back to Christie Brinkley and Paulina Porizkova.
Emily is suited perfectly for that.

 

[Bertrando3]

I agree Emily is this fine mixture of great commercial looking supermodel who can totally deliver at high fashion jobs. She has an incredible beauty (hence her multiple beauty contracts) and I can clearly see her doing S.I covers and Victoria´s secret and Express and Mango and all those big commercial brands and catalogs AND to keep doing TV and Beauty spots BUT I can also see her landing great Vogue covers. She has the height, body, modeling skills to go into high fashion. She just needs to stop being so sweet in her face and bring that demure/fiercer face that I know she can pull off.

This is a model whose career I have always been entertained at watching because she is doing her thing and takes her time but she will get up there the Maybelline contract put her on the map. I love her personality too.

The problem though with that cover is that it´s sweet and all but it looks very Marie Claire to me and not Vogue.

 

[gazebo]

She is beautiful but the outfit is ugly.

 

[Oxymore]

wow the styling

 

[narcyza]

She looks beautiful but the styling is a totally mess!

 

[kokobombon]

From what I can tell from that preview, she looks really beautiful (but I think she always does) but the styling is awful... I like that it´s a shot outside

 

[Benn98]

Awful styling, but as usual Emily's beauty is the saving grace. Interested to see the other cover.

 

[justaguy]

She does look beautiful but the styling is too much!

 

[Xone]

that title needs new direction...even Vogue Spain is way much better...

 

[IndigoHomme]

Vogue Mexico via Twitter

 

[Moofins]

Wow, the cover is terrible. The styling is garish in a word.

 

[dfl-001]

The dress alone could have worked. The coat is too much.
Strange location, though. Not using the background in any relative way.
Emily is still Beautiful!

 

[Benn98]

The dress alone could have worked. The coat is too much.
Strange location, though. Not using the background in any relative way.
Emily is still Beautiful!

I see all of it as well. The dress actually have some nice colours going, maybe something in a forest would've sufficed. I also didn't notice Emily's sheen face in the first pic.

Hopefully the edit will be better, this is David Former after all.

 

[Oxymore]

Código NYC
Model: Emily DiDonato
Photographer: David Roemer
Stylist: Sarah Gore Reeves
Hair: Felix Fisher
Make up: Georgi Sandev
Nails: Gina Edwards


photocouture-show.com

 

[kokobombon]

why is she mad or surprised in every pic?

 

[Oxymore]

I'm tired of seeing Emily styled the same way every time. I can't tell the difference with her other editorials for Vogue Paris and this.
Always in a car being pissed or really happy.

 

[MON]

Thought it was a Vogue Paris reprint..