telepathicgoat
Member
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2005
- Messages
- 533
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't think Lanvin is very 'woman friendly' in terms of it's pricetag. I do think it's amazing clothing but sometimes it is overpriced. I do wish in terms of price and construction it was a bit more accessible. It's not always the most approachable clothing and tricotine I disagree, I think ysl is a lot more approachable and 'friendly' than Lanvin. But agree on the Rochas![]()
wow I so disagree
first of all, I think Lanvin is woman-friendly because of the cut. Thngs can't be woman-unfriendly because of its pricetag!!!! OMG Just look at Chloe, which is often MORE EXPENSIVE than Lanvin! And that's considered to be one of the most "friendliest" labels. I'm confused.
YSL approachable? Wow! Just look at the sense of humor Alber has and Stefano lacks. Just take a look at the window of the Lanvin-shop in Paris. It's always so hilarious and exciting! And everyone has the Lanvin-flat shoes. (Very approachable if you ask me) And Alber always wants to make things superlight, which reflects in his choice of fabrics!!
I am so happy it is not so accessible. But, in terms of construction it's perfect for a woman! Julie Gilhart from Barney's NY said that Alber knows how to dress Women because the cut is so comfortable, light and flattering.... And he responded by saying that, because he is so big, he always wants his clothes to be superlight. If that isnt approachable, accessible, woman-friendly, I don't know what is.
I think Alber saved Parisian fashion, and made it exciting again to live in Paris. Everbody is always talking about Lanvin and I just love it! It's new Paris!
Last edited by a moderator:


so elegant
thanks


Did you know Ashton Kutcher (am I spelling that right?) stole one of his cravats and wore it to a red carpet event the next night?
You're so funny and so right.