Will Michael Jackson Have To Go To Jail? | Page 4 | the Fashion Spot
  • MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.

Will Michael Jackson Have To Go To Jail?

Status
Not open for further replies.
tiamaria said:
I think the parents are to blame as well !! If jacko is found guilty then they should be prosicuted to as they were sort of encouraging the abuse in a way.

agreed,
they are responsible cause they could even have tried to 'sell' the kids to him or looking to blackmail him.. still if there was abuse there should be panishment/psychiatric treatment

i hope it all goes well, child-abuse no more :boxer:
 
If he was guilty - would he say all that he said in the Martin Bashir interview? Wouldn't you want to hide the truth if you were guilty?


I mean, this man has done everything that a guilty man should never, ever do.
 
sex freaks sometimes feels they are entitled to abuse kids, the nature of this disease is that they feel normal...
i dont say Jackson is an abuser (until it proves so) but he could easily go overboard,
much more of he was ubused as a child himself.. he could have thought this as a normal repeat pattern
 
Arturo21 said:
If he was guilty - would he say all that he said in the Martin Bashir interview? Wouldn't you want to hide the truth if you were guilty?


I mean, this man has done everything that a guilty man should never, ever do.

Some don't feel the need to hide the truth yet they still go to court and claim innocence, I suppose they think that it shouldn't be against the law....:unsure:

I once watched a very disturbing documentary where a man on trial for sexually abusing numerous little boys who was speaking to his layer. They were in the prison meeting room where prisoners can meet with family and other visitors.

At one point the guy on trial said to his lawyer "Can we sit somehere else because I'm getting tunred on by that little boy over there sitting on his father's lap. :huh:

That is the same guy who said many times over that he had never touched boys in his life.
 
agreed celinechic, sex abuse is a very real social disease, not to be taken lightly ..i'm

surprised that some people seem not to be understanding the devastating effect these freaks have in any abused kid's life..
 
Arturo21 said:
If he was guilty - would he say all that he said in the Martin Bashir interview? Wouldn't you want to hide the truth if you were guilty?


I mean, this man has done everything that a guilty man should never, ever do.

I know that he prides himself in loving kids. I love kids too. That is fine. But isn't in somewhat suspicious that he only ever had young boys at sleepovers? :unsure:

I can show my love for kids by pushing them on swings, playing in the sand with them, volunteering at the childrens hospital, giving them hugs. I don't need to show it by having them sleep in the same bed as me.
 
why should an adult be allowed to have kids in his bed anyway?
how 'normal' is having strange kids sleeping over at his house?

boys or girls would make no difference, a kid is a kid..
and a kid cannot choose, cannot emotionally react

stop child abuse
 
^ Yes.If a bloke who lived down your street told you he liked inviting young children round to his house for sleepovers,you'd quite rightly be worried and more than a little suspicious.I don't see why we should feel any different just because it's Michael Jackson
 
Are you kidding?!?

CelineChic said:
I used to think that also. But now they have found child p*rn and pictures of little boys in speedos in his bedroom.

If this is true he needs mental help. Jail won't stop him from being a but a psyciatric hospital could.
:doh:

No, they NEVER found anything like that.
There was p*rn, but it was legal adult p*rn. That's it.

No pedophile material whatsover and that's only one of the reasons why he will not go to jail.
Pedophile always detain some illegal materials, it's in every crime's story.
They even cut his mattress and didn't find anything an aduld etero man isn't legally allowed to detain.

He may be a little weird and, of course, he has a very bad judgement, but is absolutely not a criminal.

:flower:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
if he wasn't into child abuse (i hate the pedophia term, sounds too sweet and misleading) why was he having kids sleeping in his bed?
 
Lalabel said:
:doh:

No, they NEVER found anything like that.
There was p*rn, but it was legal adult p*rn. That's it.

No pedophile material whatsover and that's only one of the reasons why he will not go to jail.
Pedophile always detain some illegal materials, it's in every crime's story.
They even cut his mattress and didn't find anything an aduld etero man isn't legally allowed to detain.

He may be a little weird and, of course, he has a very bad judgement, but is absolutely not a criminal.

:flower:

Nope. I read specifically that they found photos of little boys in speedos and partial nudes. I would call that child p*rn. Some may not. Either way he shouldn't have that type of stuff.

Quite frankly I think he should go to jail just for having children (all little boys) sleeping in his bed. He sounds like a pervert freak.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^ Nasty if that's true. To me pedophile is a dirty word. Not sweet in the least.
 
CelineChic said:
Nope. I read specifically that they found photos of little boys in speedos and partial nudes. I would call that child p*rn. Some may not. Either way he shouldn't have that type of stuff.

Quite frankly I think he should go to jail just for having children (all little boys) sleeping in his bed. He sounds like a pervert freak.


agreed!! he is a sick individual and shouldn't be allowed to continue with what he's been doing.
 
pedophile comes from greek, literaly it means : the friend of kids :shock:

hence i hate this word, child abuser is a much on-your-face term for this kind of people than mere 'pedophile' thats my argument ..hope you guys get the point

lets not sugar the bitter pill..
i also agree with celinechic, i've read in the cnn they've found kiddie p*rn material in his estate, so ..says a lot ....

stop child abuse now
 
I see now, I did not know the literal translation. That's odd that they would give them that term, it's still a bad word in today's context, you say paedophile and people start gnashing their teeth, at least where I'm from.
 
CelineChic said:
Yikes! It is no wonder why you find the word misleading. :shock:

yes, i guess now you know why the word makes me mad...:angry:

Tinuviel said:
That's odd that they would give them that term, it's still a bad word in today's context
exactly.. its a real misleading use of this term, see the connection with philanthropy or philosophy ... "philos" means 'a friend' so pedophile/pedophilia.. can you make the connection?
i refuse to use the term myself, i prefer calling those people child abusers, makes more sense and reminds one exactly the nature of the crime, cause to me, its a major crime..

abusing childern and animals makes me totally mad,
cause neither kids nor animals can actually 'react' to the abuse
 
CelineChic said:
Nope. I read specifically that they found photos of little boys in speedos and partial nudes. I would call that child p*rn. Some may not. Either way he shouldn't have that type of stuff.

Quite frankly I think he should go to jail just for having children (all little boys) sleeping in his bed. He sounds like a pervert freak.

I reply to that only

Nope!
Sorry dear, you read something specifically wrong! That is slander!


It's incredible how people can become such illogical
when talking about someone who they don't like.:rolleyes:

How can you believe that a jury of 12 would take an entire week without deliberating about a defendant who, to your words, detains some "child p*rn"?!??!? :doh: :blink: :doh:

*That absolutely never happend and I can tell you 4 sure*




Better read less tabloids :innocent:
 
no reason to be ironic lala, cause i dont think the article is tabloid material... must have been on cnn cause i'm positive i've read it too.
of course you may concider cnn tabloid in which case.. no comments
 
During closing arguments, the prosecution projected images on a big screen showing several boys who had testified that they slept with Mr. Jackson. Mr. Zonen also told jurors about magazines and books that investigators found at Mr. Jackson's Neverland ranch that featured young boys in various stages of undress, and some that featured girls. He showed images from some of those materials on the big screen.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/02/national/02cnd-jackson.html?ex=1118721600&en=a0a544068fc97c1a&ei=5070&fta=y
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,123
Messages
15,249,642
Members
88,138
Latest member
sofiapiazza
Back
Top