saucer-like
Active Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2008
- Messages
- 1,903
- Reaction score
- 8
Hallelujah! I'm thrilled this nightmare has finally come to an end.
Watch Live & Comment... The 2025 Golden Globe Awards!
styleWhat Does Alexander Wang’s Reported Exit From Balenciaga Mean for the Business?
This morning’s WWD report suggests that Alexander Wang will soon exit Balenciaga. When reached for comment this morning, Kering would only confirm “that discussions are under way between Alexander Wang and Balenciaga/Kering regarding the renewal of the designer’s contract.” If the WWD article is accurate and Spring ’16 will be Wang’s last collection for the French house, Balenciaga would be the first thing Wang touched that didn’t turn to gold.
I don’t pretend to know the backstory. Is Kering unhappy with Balenciaga’s results, despite their upward rise? Does Wang want out to refocus his attention on his growing eponymous label? Is all of this merely tactics to improve the renewal terms for either side? Whatever the facts of the matter, from my vantage point, the customary three-year contract looks too short. Wang was gaining critical traction lately. If he hadn’t yet imbued Balenciaga with his own distinctive point of view on a level with that of his predecessor, Nicolas Ghesquière, he had grown newly confident.
Inheriting the creative director position from Ghesquière, one of fashion’s most beloved designers, was never going to be easy. A quick exit has the potential to tarnish Wang’s reputation as the industry’s golden boy, if not the bottom line at his own brand. Wang’s failure—perceived or actual—could make recruiting someone new at Balenciaga more difficult. What’s more, that someone new will have to stick, or else the label risks losing some of its own luster. Perhaps it’s not surprising, then, that WWD’s report indicated Kering might opt to go with someone internal or lesser known as Wang’s replacement.
To me, one of the most interesting side notes here is how quickly hiring an unknown has become a formula for success. Six months after Alessandro Michele had everybody scratching their heads with his first menswear collection for Gucci, he looks like the brand’s savior. But the industry’s rush to embrace Michele—it’s well deserved, I believe—doesn’t necessarily ensure the same kind of synergy will happen elsewhere.
Which brings up the topic of contenders who are better known. With Kering’s recent investment in the Christopher Kane and Altuzarra businesses, both of their names will no doubt come up. Could Kering lure Julien Dossena away from Puig’s Paco Rabanne, which he has lately put back on the map? (He has the advantage of having worked with Ghesquière at Balenciaga.) Whoever ultimately lands the gig, it should be their only project. If Balenciaga’s Wang era has any lesson to offer, it’s that building and maintaining the brand identities of two international labels (on two separate continents, in Wang’s case) is too large a task for one designer, even if he’s one of the most energetic ones we’ve got.
Kering is ridiculous with their constant shuffling of designers. If I was a designer I'd never agree to work for one of their houses because you know you'll be out in about 5 years max.
Kering want money, they don't want any vision if it doesn't sell. They just don't care at all. It's like Wang can "design" basics and everything will be fine, because they still have accessories (designed by Ghesquiere).
Wang for Balenciaga was supposed to be a hit for Kering. They wanted someone young, who appeal to a younger audience, who was mainstream enough and who was able to make compromises. I don't think it succeeded.
Good riddance!
gifsesc