Anna Wintour received a pie in her face !

Acid said:
this is a video of an animal being skinned, this put me off fur forever

http://www.petatv.com/tvpopup/Prefs.asp?video=fur_farm


:flower: :flower:

I'm completely against fur(but not in a 'throw a pie in wintour's face' way... though come to think of it, i'm not exactly bothered that someone did that either haha) . I'm glad you took the time to inform yourself to make a good choice. Plus, it is always nice to hear about designers who decline to use fur. Their decisions tend to be more influential to others.
 
That is so extremely childish what PETA did; it's unacceptable behaviour.

PETA is a ridiculously immature and ignorant group anyway and I'm not even surprised.

I respect their beliefs but I do not respect their tactics. They need to act like adults.
 
No one would notice if they were quietly writing letters, and we wouldn't be having this discussion. And some perspective, please.... it may be childish, and it certainly is messy, but a pie in the face doesn't cause injury. It isn't *that* big a deal.
 
I think it's pathetic, I don't see one reason whatsoever for the animals to be skinned alive. I'm against fur, but I know some people are not and won't stop using fur... But why do they have to have such disrespect to the animals?! I know it's contraditory, but see my point: if they will kill the animal anyway, why in such a painful one?
That brings me to human nature: those guys kicking dogs and cats, from my point of view they deserve to die... And I hate them for that. But violence is resposed by violence and that goes on forever.

On a more light note, I quite laughed from Wintour... PETA is too extremist but she's sooo arrogant :P
 
Bonchic said:
ughh I think PETA should use a different approach to getting their message across..:innocent:

They can't use a different method, cuz this is the only way they will actually get any attention, and to be honest I support Peta more than I support Anna W. I don't like her at all.
 
Good lord. I know a lot of people don't like Anna Wintour but the woman commands the most influencial fashion magazine in print....give her some credit. Although I must say...I'm not an advocate of fur but the pie in the face is extremely childish.
 
This thread is making me angry because so many people are missing the point. One poster stated that Peta was like a "terrorist organisation" and another stated "you can't impose your beliefs". Well I tell you what, it's fine to have beliefs, but when it affects somebody or SOMETHING then I think it is absolutely necessary to stand up for what you believe in.

It isn't just that Anna Wintour believes fur is acceptable, she openly promotes the use of fur and therefore the suffering of millions of animals. Come on, have you ever seen a fur farm? I've visited a rabbit farm and however terrible it was, it wasn't even the worst there is. Peta do not HURT anybody physically, they challenge people to think about their actions and for them to be compared to a terrorist organisation is pathetic and small minded. They have an uphill battle because meat eating and fur wearing is ingrained in the psyche of people every day from a very young age. I'm sure throwing a pie isn't exactly the best message but isn't it easy to understand their frustration from 30 years of campaigning and still facing the same struggles every day? Don't forget that this is their job, their every day life.

Furthermore somebody else stated that Peta was dangerous because "they value the life of animals over human beings". For a start i'm not sure where you got that from, but it's completely ridiculous. Peta's policy is that "NO SENTIENT BEING SHOULD SUFFER". That means every animal on this planet, every human, whether rich or poor, every animal whether big or small, should be allowed the same basic rights and standard of life. Secondly, there are so many organisations dedicated to human rights. Now, if Peta dropped everything to join this massive number of charities it wouldn't make much difference. Honestly it wouldn't. I'm glad that thre are people who monitor the horrible abuses that needlessly happen in society, to intelligent capable creatures. Their belief is that if people learn to respect their bodies, the animals around them and the planet then this world will be a better place, and with a vegetarian diet it will be easier to eradicate life threatening illnesses and extreme hunger.

Peta does go over the top and i've sent them e-mails (and had replies incidentally) but it's equally as bad to buy into the anti-peta propaganda, and trust me there's a lot of it out there. The fact is they've done a lot of good, and they're doing a lot of good and just because somebody throws a pie out of frustration it doesn't instantly turn them into terrorists.

And about the misinformation argument, seriously, this company doesn't have anything to gain from lying about the abuse to animals. Neither to the other hundreds of dedicated organisations out there who spend all their time doing undercover operations and exposes. Just because somebody cares why does it instantly negate their view? I'll never understand this stance. When you've SEEN the treatment of animals for yourself and when you've looked at evidence other people have found then you realise there is a gross disrespect for life on this planet.

And as for the person who started eating meat again and dropped any principles just to 'get back at peta'..well..what can I say..I feel sorry for you if..no i'm not even going to say it. I just feel sorry for you. That's pretty petty and pointless. You should have done it because you really couldn't survive without meat, because you'd thought long and hard about it and realised that morally you were fine with eating meat. So..yeah i've said my two cents and they're a bit incoherent because i'm really tired but eh...
 
melt977 said:
Anyone remembers the BBC documentary (must be 5 years ago) where people whoused to be Peta members were saying how they were being thretened to perform violent ats in favour of the Peta cause? People (enemies of Peta in the organisation's minds) would receive gist boxes in the post and when they would open it their hand would get aught in ammean device that could actually sverely damage their whole arm... isn't this violent? Isn't this cruel? How can you take their cause seriously and support them? Even if they have a case you are forced to ignore it in the face of their acts...

Uhm, don't remember it and Peta would have been shut down and sent to jail if this was true. It's illegal to send weapons in the mail or to bait a human being :blink:
 
PETA make themselves look like fools.. :doh:
Why can't they bring out their message, without throwing things after people? I mean, it's okay if they demonstrate .. but, yeah. They don't have to be that rude. I, myself love animals. I think it's wrong to kill animals.
 
YAY! I've literally never been this happy! Finally-- something to shut that b*tch up.
Anna is one of the most influencial people in the fashion industry, but also one of the most harshest and toughest! Didn't anyone see The Devil Wears Prada? That was based on her.
 
Personally I think PETA promotes the opposite of what they want..they are becoming parasites that people WANT to piss off. I think fur is a personal thing. You either agree or dont..both sides should leave each other alone..

I love fur but I do agree it is not necissary to make animals suffer (being skinned alive) that is just immoral and frankly tastless.
 
Sorry to spam this thread.. Just watched that peta video..those people are savages.. why the heck did they do that to those animals.. they could have made it painless but they wanted to torture them. Those people should be skinned alive.

As for the pie in the face, I wander what shoes go with that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder if it tasted good...i'm making a tofu pie and maybe anna can recommend the recipe to me...
 
Anna is annoying, but I downright HATE PETA.

Once a (past, I believe) president of PETA stated that if by using animal testing science could find a cure for AIDS, "we" (PETA) would be against it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I was to take sides, Id pick Peta any day. Anna's a b*tch.
 
I guess the PETAs don't really know what goes on in science because most of the prescription drugs are tested on animals as IND before they could be clinically tested on humans. For this reason, I guess the PETA members will have to refuse the usage of medications because they were tested on animals...actually, humans are animals as well, so I guess they willnot be able to take ANY kind of mediaction...not even OTC because they were once tested or based on studies that were done on animals...so eventually all PETA members will die from untreated illness...
 
Foxie-Pooh said:
I guess the PETAs don't really know what goes on in science because most of the prescription drugs are tested on animals as IND before they could be clinically tested on humans. For this reason, I guess the PETA members will have to refuse the usage of medications because they were tested on animals...actually, humans are animals as well, so I guess they willnot be able to take ANY kind of mediaction...not even OTC because they were once tested or based on studies that were done on animals...so eventually all PETA members will die from untreated illness...


We are NOT animals! :angry:
 
Hello fellow aucklandeer! Can I point something out? First and foremost is that the 4th biggest killer in the United States is Prescription medication. This is not from overdose or illegal prescriptions. Just from negative side effects. Secondly - I have a huge respect for Native American culture. I find them to be incredibly intelligent people. They survived for a very very long time using natural remedies to cure people. They studied the properties of certain plants on the human body and managed to pass down a tradition of herbology and medicine through their tribes. This is the same as many groups within the rainforests.

This skill has been lost. All the remedies we need are found within nature but the majority of people rely on major drug companies (who receive a majority of profit and funding from investors in their labs) to provide them with a quick fix.

Of course medication is a good thing but for a start, a lot of illnesses today are man made due to excess, poor diet and stress, and secondly a lot of people are overly reliant on medication anyway. Thirdly, within the next decade or two all testing should theoretically be able to be performed on cloned tissue which is more effective than testing on animals - our makeup is very different to that of a mouse, for example all cats are lactose intolerant so if you did a test on cats to see whether a new milk drink would be suitable for humans and they pooped out their insides - it wouldn't really be conclusive for the majority of people.

And i'm not sure about the vehemence of the statement "we are not animals". Why get so upset? We may have bigger brains but then again so many humans are morons, I'd prefer to spend my time with my cat than a drunk boozed up bimbo sl*t. (Or a legion of other idiots....). Oh wait I already do :D

Come herrrre James Earl Jonesss....play with mousey mouse...

(i'd just like to state by the way that under no circumstances would I throw a pie at anyone to prove my point, but I do face this frustrating situation every day and sometimes i'm tempted to b*tch slap at least :wink: )
 
lol yay! an Auckland person!! Well I agree with you on most of what you said, but the fact that you think we're animals. I refuse to believe we're animals.
 
I am just trying to point out the idiosyncrasies of the PETA and their contradictory principles...I'm not saying that drugs are good, because we all know that all drugs are poisons...but if they are true purists who despise everything that involves the exploitation of animals then they have to stick to that belief and live it. That way, they can reorganize as a group and gain power in a respective manner.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,538
Messages
15,188,343
Members
86,420
Latest member
MissMont
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->