So I don't have much time but I'm currently not majoring in ARt History but I will be soon once I change school. I'm taking an Art History course now and I'm making 117... go figure. I end up teaching teh class half the time as my teacher, who's an actual artist, can't really explain things and... she's just not really good at it.
In regards to the person who says that ARt History students are people who are failed artists... I think with that methodology then people who read are failed writers. I study art because I like art and I love discussion. IN order to adequately discuss the art and to be able to give others insite to the art... I need to know the vernacular. I need to be able to see past the surface myself. To do this, I need to be educated about what the artist's points of reference could be and how these references themselves came about... it's very much like fashion. If you're reading a runway review by Tim Blanks or Tavi it's different than the 17 year old blogger who just loves buying Marc Jacobs bag and has no clue of the history of fashion... she can say oohh and ahh while they can talk about hedonism, YSL influences, and other motifs prevelant through the collection and the Marc Jacobs aesthetic in general...
"Just Being Honest"