I actually found the unwavering diligence of this collection refreshing. The vision is there, and it is executed with complete precision. Quite simply he didn’t shy away from it and explored it from start to finish.
I like that there isn’t an obvious sense of commercialization of the initial idea. Each piece can stand on its own yet will still work with the remainder of the collection. Nothing is too familiar or basic, and as a result you won’t be getting these pieces confused with any other designer. Which perhaps will strengthen the brand? It’s almost as effective as a logo I guess, to those who follow fashion.
It’s like the clutches, it wasn’t just one or two suggested throughout the collection, every single model had one. It reinforced the idea; the impact was hard to forget. I imagine women wanting to have a clutch over a bag when wearing something from this collection.
I understand and agree that many of the pieces when worn separately would sever the really clear effect that was created during the show, the play on light reflection. But I don’t see how they couldn’t be re-interpreted by a customer. At the end of the day the customer decides how they will wear the garment, what time, what with, which accessories, that all amount to a personal interpretation.
To me, I just admire the fact that for once it appears that a collection wasn’t out to please the bankers. It was about pushing an idea and testing the boundaries of what we think a dress or jacket should be etc. And after all that I still see some beautiful cutting, proportions, and fabrics that can be appreciated by everyone, and worn by everyone (well those with a sufficient income anyway!)
I like that there isn’t an obvious sense of commercialization of the initial idea. Each piece can stand on its own yet will still work with the remainder of the collection. Nothing is too familiar or basic, and as a result you won’t be getting these pieces confused with any other designer. Which perhaps will strengthen the brand? It’s almost as effective as a logo I guess, to those who follow fashion.
It’s like the clutches, it wasn’t just one or two suggested throughout the collection, every single model had one. It reinforced the idea; the impact was hard to forget. I imagine women wanting to have a clutch over a bag when wearing something from this collection.
I understand and agree that many of the pieces when worn separately would sever the really clear effect that was created during the show, the play on light reflection. But I don’t see how they couldn’t be re-interpreted by a customer. At the end of the day the customer decides how they will wear the garment, what time, what with, which accessories, that all amount to a personal interpretation.
To me, I just admire the fact that for once it appears that a collection wasn’t out to please the bankers. It was about pushing an idea and testing the boundaries of what we think a dress or jacket should be etc. And after all that I still see some beautiful cutting, proportions, and fabrics that can be appreciated by everyone, and worn by everyone (well those with a sufficient income anyway!)
Not sure what you mean by tubes but the hair is what makes the fabric strong and hard
