Thats what I like about this ad; the contrast between the angelic dress and the edgy model, playing with hard/soft and masculine/feminine. A sweeter looking girl would have made it a lot less interesting, in my opinion.lordevan said:i think freja is totally wrong for the dress. she is too... "kick ***" looking when that outfit is supposed to look angelic. freja is gorgeous, but in a very androgynous way. i would much rather see someone cuter, less masculine, and more doll like. i think Vlada Roslyakova or Caroline Trentini would of been better for that winged outfit.
I think the ad is perfect the way it is! The setup and lighting probably wouldn't have had as much impact if it had been either one of the models you mentioned; I think it would've been a very dismissable ad had they used a more doll-faced model. That's just my opinion thoughlordevan said:i think freja is totally wrong for the dress. she is too... "kick ***" looking when that outfit is supposed to look angelic. freja is gorgeous, but in a very androgynous way. i would much rather see someone cuter, less masculine, and more doll like. i think Vlada Roslyakova or Caroline Trentini would of been better for that winged outfit.
exactly , though i dont agree w/ your choices for replacement. the entire show was delicate and soft and freja just does not represent that. the outfit would have looked better on someone with finer features and maybe a blonde.lordevan said:i think freja is totally wrong for the dress. she is too... "kick ***" looking when that outfit is supposed to look angelic. freja is gorgeous, but in a very androgynous way. i would much rather see someone cuter, less masculine, and more doll like. i think Vlada Roslyakova or Caroline Trentini would of been better for that winged outfit.
Ditto!KhaoticKharma said:Pretty clothes.
And...well...Freja... looks very Freja.