Blogger Jane Aldridge For Urban Outfitters

Status
Not open for further replies.
What a life to lead though. She's a very fortunate girl and who wouldn't jump at a chance like that? Great style.Great blog- any others similar to Janes that i can add to my bookmarks?
 
This is great news for her but I agree with those that don't love the shoes.

I always thought she should be a model. She is just stunning.

Does anyone read her mom's blog? You can't be raised by a woman like that and not come out stylish.
 
^ i love her mom's blog!! (and of course jane's too) she's one stylish woman
 
The shoes aren't great, but it is UO.. they are usually eons behind and I doubt Jane has had any prior training to this experience..
she's just 17 after all...

I love reading Jane & Judy's blogs...
I don't understand the hate people have towards Jane..
she never comes off as snobbish or self-righteous in the slightest, imo...
her blog is also one of the few truly interesting/dynamic blogs out there...
So what, she has money and is incredibly lucky...

Sending good vibes her way!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i am new to her blog and spent most of my evening reading the whole thing. I think her style is really great. She is extremely fortunate but I also never get the vibe that she thinks she's better than anyone, she just enjoys beautiful clothes and shoes and happens to be able to afford them. I love that although she has a lot of clothes, etc, she wears things often instead of just once and casting them aside,
 
00240m.jpg

style.com
I love her blog so much and hate to bring it up but the flats are very Comme Des Garçons F/W 08 but I think I might get them because I have been looking for a similar style for a while.
 
She's just a fortunate rich girl with a enviable
collection of shoes...

Sorry but she's no designer........

:innocent:

i agree, she does seem like a really nice girl and i like her blog but let's not mistake talent or knowledge in fashion with her being fortunate enough to be able to afford some amazing designer pieces.
 
as she is a TFSer I wish she could come here and talk about it .... like did she just chose shoes she love and they say well let's redesign it ???

but I think she's in Japan (no stalker, just a reader babes !)

She's just a fortunate rich girl with a enviable
collection of shoes...

Sorry but she's no designer........

:innocent:
though she's very nice as already mentionned and seem pretty smart ... I have to agree with that ....
because i think we seem to forget her style or kindness isn't in question here ... but her ability to design (though i think it's all fake ... see my first question ...)

I don't understand the hate people have towards Jane..
she never comes off as snobbish or self-righteous in the slightest, imo...
c'mone it's not hate. everybody said they love her ! it's not cory kennedy we're talking about, there - though the story looks familiar !

but i don't understand ................................. and i'm really scared to be banned or hated for that ........................ why would she deserve that ?????? is she in a fashion school ??????? has she ever worked to be a shoe designer ? i always thought you had to work to deserve something ...

sending her good vibes too, anyway ......

it's just "sad" a girl who never ask anything is falling into the system ........
:unsure:

* hope i hadn't been too clumsy (?) *
 
Last edited by a moderator:
She seems genuinely nice, and that's great she got the opportunity to do that; but I regret she went for knockoffs. This being said, I don't know how involved she was in the process...




why would she deserve that ?????? is she in a fashion school ??????? has she ever worked to be a shoe designer ? i always thought you had to work to deserve something ...

Dear, I thought it was pretty obvious that it's been a couple of years now, you don't need to "work" to deserve something :lol: If you're somehow famous/well-known, there'll always be someone who'll ask you to put your name on something to make $$$$$.
Apparently that "philosophy" also applies to fashion.
 
I totally love her blog and my post earlier was just for a comparison I not putting this collaboration down at all actually it makes me really happy that the internet is helping younger people get their ideas out.
 
This reminds me a bit the Olsen twins shoe project. I don't understand why people who has an excellent taste and own amazing collections want to use their name for products of less good quality and less original design. From what I can see on the pictures these shoes are neither very good quality nor unique design.
 
This reminds me a bit the Olsen twins shoe project. I don't understand why people who has an excellent taste and own amazing collections want to use their name for products of less good quality and less original design. From what I can see on the pictures these shoes are neither very good quality nor unique design.

but then again, Urban Outfitters is not necessarily known for their quality shoes. Perhaps it's not a flaw in Jane's design but rather poor production by UO.
 
i reread my post and don't want to be mistaken - it's weird how as soon as it's someone closer to you (she is a member, so eventually it touches me more if she feels sick about the comments) your way of 'typing' can change ...

my problem in this collaboration doesn't stand at all in jane living her passion - she obviously loves shoes, so that's good she's been contacted for shoes - and not outfits for instance.
my problem is that she's now part of this dirty marketing-business fashion thing which call 'young celebs' only to make $$$ on teens' back ! and in the fact that she absolutely didn't design anything (it's sooo obvious ! but a word of hers would be good !) which is purely fake !!! ... she just sort of sells her name (in a word herself - a bit pushy am i, perhaps) ! and at such a young age (she's what ? 17 ? 18 ?) !!!

so eventhough it's great to live your passion, there's certain way to do it !
i'm sorry but i may sound old-fashionned .... but that's what i think.

i just hope this opportunity will make her happy and that in the future she will eventually do her OWN line of shoes !
 
I'm not going to knock the girl for doing her thing. Opportunities come your way, you take it. But I will say it's unfortunate that it's with UO considering the owner's past history and "issues". :innocent:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
^from wiki

Controversies

The company has sold a number of controversial products, some of which have drawn strong criticism.
In 2003 the company released a Monopoly parody called Ghettopoly. The game was criticised as offensively racist by a local chapter of the NAACP[5] and black clergy[6] among others.

[edit] Products alleged to be anti-Christian

On March 14, 2004, Jesus Dress Up sparked controversy when a Philadelphia man, known only as "Gerry", voiced his outrage after seeing the magnets at an Urban Outfitters store in the King of Prussia mall.[7] He wrote a letter of complaint to the chain and brought his story to his local NBC affiliate WCAU-TV when he received their response: Urban Outfitters stated that the magnet was not being sold to offend anyone, but to reflect a diversity of opinion among its customer base. The story was broadcast on NBC in Philadelphia, then MSNBC’s Scarborough Country,[8] on which it received coverage alongside the premiere of The Passion of the Christ. Urban Outfitters received more than 250,000 complaints, due mostly to organizational efforts from activism group websites sponsored by the American Family Association.[9] Following the controversy on March 17, Urban Outfitters cancelled its remaining orders with the artist and publicly stated that they would no longer order the magnets to carry on their shelves but would sell their remaining stock. [10]

[edit] Products alleged to be anti-Jewish or anti-Israel

A t-shirt released in 2003 with the phrase "Everyone Loves a Jewish Girl" surrounded by dollar signs was condemned,[11] though the Anti-Defamation League welcomed the decision to discontinue the shirts, saying that they hoped "that this experience, combined with another recent controversy surrounding an Urban Outfitters product that reinforced stereotypes, has served to sensitize the company to the sensibilities of its customer base and all ethnic groups."[12] The ADL later condemned them for other incidents of insensitivity.[13]
In 2007, complaints by Jewish groups over their sales of keffiyehs (which had been marketed as "antiwar" scarves)[14] led them to cease carrying that item.[15] Urban Outfitters issued a statement “Due to the sensitive nature of this item, we will no longer offer it for sale. We apologize if we offended anyone, this was by no means our intention.” [16]
In May 2008, after concern in the Jewish community, Urban Outfitters discontinued a T-shirt that featured a Palestinian child holding an AK-47 over the word "Victimized." According to a company representative, "[W]e do not buy items to provoke controversy or to intentionally offend. We have pulled this item in all of our locations and will no longer be selling it online either."[17]

[edit] Products alleged to be pro-violence

In 2006, the retailer was criticized [18] for offering sparkly handgun-shaped Christmas ornaments in its hometown of Philadelphia, a city that had seen over 1,700 shootings and over 300 gun-related murders for the year.[19] On November 15, 2007, the company announced that after the murder of officer Charles Cassidy, the gun-shaped ornament would no longer be sold.[20]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_Outfitters
 
i don't think any of those are so bad to be honest :blink:

whenever someone does something ~controversial~ there's ALWAYS going to be someone who's going to be offended and speak up. UO is just always trying to be 'edgy' and 'hip' and sometimes fails, that's it imo :rolleyes:
 
this is not about who is an actual designer or not.
it is very simple:
she has style, came up with a blog called "sea of shoes", has some great shoes (between her and her mum) and has an immense following
so UO has been very clever to ask her. it is all about marketing.
her readers include a lot of UO target customers and vice versa. whoever really 'loves' her and her blog will actually RUN to UO.
not everyone who does fashion is actually a designer. that is just how it is :smile:
UO is clever and so is she...
JANE,
make the most out of it :wink:
 
i don't think any of those are so bad to be honest :blink:

whenever someone does something ~controversial~ there's ALWAYS going to be someone who's going to be offended and speak up. UO is just always trying to be 'edgy' and 'hip' and sometimes fails, that's it imo :rolleyes:

It's not really controversial, but I wouldn't support a company, that in the past, has contributed money to politicians that would compare my lifestyle to incest, bigamy and adultery.

Anyway, the shoes look like something you would buy at UO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,499
Messages
15,187,360
Members
86,392
Latest member
Sashalove93
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "058526dd2635cb6818386bfd373b82a4"
<-- Admiral -->