Its a nice collection. Not enough for me to buy it, as few things are just not my style but I can say some looks are nice to look at. For Philo's Celine, I own and like her earlier Celine and her minimal sexier Celine pieces rather than the later sacky ones. It was just not my style but I could still acknowledged her work.
Personally, my problem with Daniel Lee is this:
I just had a talk with a friend few days ago about Rothko. I was whining about how easy it must have been for him to "just" block painted his canvas ( as I am painting myself, in another style, which feels hard and so long to finish it). And that if I would paint and work in Rothkos style, I would produce hundreds of works a year
But my friend corrected me. First, its not easy at all and second, he had an urge to paint like this. It naturally came out of him. A lot of Artists who see and admire original works try to paint like the original, but you can always tell and see its not the real thing. there will always be something slightly off. Even if its nice at first sight. But its missing the painters own personal story which would make it unique. They think its easy to just plurge colour like Pollock or block paint like Rothko. But liking a style and to try doing the same doesnt work.
Clearly I know fashion and fashion buisness is different. as long as it looks nice and makes you look nice it doesnt matter, especially not to the masses. But for me personally, when buying something it means supporting something and by not buying something it means to not support. I can get a nice black mini dress with similiar silhouettes from probably 10 designers. but its my choice who of those 10 I want to support by buying it.
So yes Daniel Lee its nice, but I will not buy until I see something of you in it that really excites me.