FashionPower
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Messages
- 10,355
- Reaction score
- 3,984
Calvin Klein II:the Revenge
I miss the quirky girly-ness of Chloe. The brand used to have so much energy and charisma in it. To be honest there's barely anything feminine about these clothes, they're extremely masculine. Everything is far too stiff and too plain.
^^^^ testino was fired because the company profits have fallen. As I said earlier the clothes are not bad per se , but changing the ethos of a well established house isnt a good idea, Chloe always had that dirty pretty aesthetic even in the Lagerfeld era . Under Phoebe the brand was minting money of the shoes , paddington bags , dresses and esp pants , it doesnt have any cash cow products anymore . Another thing which isnt Hannahs fault other brands have become the places to shop like Pucci ,Alexander Wang , which offer an "it girl" factor and are actually cheaper in price than chloes' banal dresses.