I find there's something very insidious about US Cosmo's use of food on their cover... like it's designed to appeal to people's inner impulse-buying compulsions, except these foodstuffs are always being held by women whose heads look too big for their bodies, so it's evident this consumption is for display purposes only.
It's like Cosmo's message of how to 'have it all' in life has been reduced to the magazine pretending to sell the secret of how you can have alcohol, pizza and the perfect body. It feels like they're only a few steps away from a coverline that reads "how to binge-eat according to your star sign and still look like a million dollars for less".
I suppose they could innocently argue that it's just a cover formula designed to set them apart from other magazines. When you think about it, nobody's eating on the cover of US Bazaar - and that's when you know how bad this is. Not even Bazaar would do this.
Unless Bazaar are saving it for December's cover theme.