Cover Rumor Thread

Meghan Markle is back on instagram, Netflix just released Polo series produced by her and trailer for her upcoming show.

Vogue US do I see you?!?
 
She's basically fallen back into being an influencer.

Ms Markle might need to demonstrate an ability to be consistently successful at something positive before Vogue would consider her as a solo star, but who knows what the current standards are.

US Harper's Bazaar has always been more of a fan and would probably love to have her, if she would have them (even these days, people seem to hold out for a Vogue cover over Bazaar).

If there's a divorce in 2025, Vanity Fair is your best bet, whether that's with an official interview or not.
 
To me, everything feels right in the world whenever models from their respective countries grace the cover of Vogue. Therefore, I'm down to see Alessandra Ambrosio on the cover of Vogue Brazil. Already loving the beach setting and the styling. I wonder if she was photographed by Lufré?
 
To me, everything feels right in the world whenever models from their respective countries grace the cover of Vogue. Therefore, I'm down to see Alessandra Ambrosio on the cover of Vogue Brazil. Already loving the beach setting and the styling. I wonder if she was photographed by Lufré?
Shoot by Nicole Heiniger.
 
After being acquired by Condé Nast Vogue Arabia has taken down the website, social medias and seem to be preparing for a big relaunch. Any thoughts on the cover when the magazine returns in March?
 
She's basically fallen back into being an influencer.

Ms Markle might need to demonstrate an ability to be consistently successful at something positive before Vogue would consider her as a solo star, but who knows what the current standards are.

US Harper's Bazaar has always been more of a fan and would probably love to have her, if she would have them (even these days, people seem to hold out for a Vogue cover over Bazaar).

If there's a divorce in 2025, Vanity Fair is your best bet, whether that's with an official interview or not.
Talk about being prescient
 
I am surprised that the Vanity Fair article (already online) is fairly critical of them, although in terms of the strength of its criticism, it's two steps forward, one step backtracking.

But when a mainstream US media publication is no longer promoting the picture of a new power couple, and instead is speaking about how their employees needed to get therapy, and how a post-divorce book was already offered to publishers, the shine has certainly worn off now, even in America.

I'll probably be repeating this in the actual thread, when it gets up and running - but the celebrity world is full of unpleasant characters, covered up by the machinery of the entertainment industry, by the smoke and mirrors. So the idea that Meghan and Harry are sh*tty people isn't really the issue.

The celebrity universe will always give you a pass if you are sh*tty but also very talented, very good-looking or very charismatic/popular with the public, or a combination of any of those things.

Meghan and Harry are - by Hollywood standards - none of those things, and they aren't even consistent with how they capitalise on their royal connections, being the human equivalent of that cartoon where someone is sawing off the same tree branch that they're sitting on.

As time goes on, people come to their own conclusions as to whether the couple are being unfairly persecuted - or whether they're unlikeable as a result of their own cumulative actions - but I do not know where things can go from here, except further downwards.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
212,845
Messages
15,201,156
Members
86,887
Latest member
PlantAficianado
Back
Top