fashionista-ta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Messages
- 17,375
- Reaction score
- 917
Time changes. I think why Jil was successful, it's because there was a long going trend about dressing neat up till Celine hype went calm. There indeed are people relate Jil to some version of Saville Row. But more I feel it's the Balenciaga/Calvin Klein/Jil Sander bunch that really made it great. Their business went down after it faded.
Margiela is able to pull that string, that's great for them. Jil is a different case. I'm not suggesting they should go with everyone else. But their aesthetic is their weakness at the current state of fashion.
It doesn't have to be a weakness. There are a number of dedicated minimalists who will never wear Alessandro's Gucci. Just think of the success of the SL tailored pieces that have zip to do with the runway or the advertising. There's no reason Jil Sander couldn't have a piece of that business. Look at Armani. There's no reason Jil Sander couldn't play in the same space. What they need is excellence, tailoring, and design--not hype. Hype may be working for some, but real women need real clothes, and those who live and die by hype are mostly not addressing that need in the least.

Sad times.