It could definitely have a renaissance in the next decade or so, but it will probably be increasingly niche. Ann was well-known in the industry, but she was never "The Star on The Top". This the case for lots of the Belgian designers we see in Paris.Do you all think that sort of Art Nouveau - misty Northern European cobble street type romanticism is no longer relevant?
sort of like bauhaus but in love.
can definitely see him at Chanel and maybe jeremy scott at louis vuitton.. The giant hardwares collection was already getting too close to moschino.
It would be interesting to see him at a Couture house with concrete sets of codes again. Even if the results are less than desirable.The rumor that Nicolas Ghesquière will be replacing Virginie Viard at Chanel has bubbled up again.
It seems entirely plausible to me.
I don't really see his work at Louis Vuitton as bad, but it is very heavy-handed (oversized clothes, heavy boots, overstyled everything).What a mess that will be. Nicolas still hasnt made a decent proposition at LV. His goodness seems to rely on the house hes at and its codes. so his Chanel may be good but he hasnt been good since 2012.
y’all better keeping dreaming because Virginie’s Chanel is selling like hot cakes.
It would be interesting to see him at a Couture house with concrete sets of codes again. Even if the results are less than desirable.
I don't really see his work at Louis Vuitton as bad, but it is very heavy-handed (oversized clothes, heavy boots, overstyled everything).
In an interview, he claimed that he did intend for his Louis Vuitton quite mininal and approachable compared to his Balenciaga, but the suits pushed him to do more attention-grabbing spectacles. Part of me thinks this is why they started doing destination cruise shows and why Virgil, and later Pharrel, were hired.
I think that he could do a good job at Chanel, but he'll definitely need to take a more dynamic, light-handed approach for his Chanel to work at maximum potential. He could probably do with replacing Marie-Amélie Sauvé too, maybe Suzanne Koller or Karl Templer.
Plus the Wertheimer brothers have not settled their succession yet... and Eliane Heilbronn is still the predominant voice.y’all better keeping dreaming because Virginie’s Chanel is selling like hot cakes.
I agree, it's just that I find her approach to Ghesquiere's work to be too much, as his Louis Vuitton is already quite maximalist.The one Chanel collection by Viard that I liked, SS 23, was actually styled by Marie-Amelie.
I agree, it's just that I find her approach to Ghesquiere's work to be too much, as his Louis Vuitton is already quite maximalist.
Do you know who usually styles Chanel? I know that Sauvé did SS'23, but the rest of Virginie's shows are uncredited in that role.
Plus the Wertheimer brothers have not settled their succession yet... and Eliane Heilbronn is still the predominant voice.
The rumor that Nicolas Ghesquière will be replacing Virginie Viard at Chanel has bubbled up again.
It seems entirely plausible to me.
I would accept Nicholas at Chanel, absolutely. It seems super logical. I can see it and know all the women would be wearing it while adding even more clients. A success in my mind !
However.
The fashion industry seems illogical as of late as pairings and hirings you think would be perfect and should be acted upon don’t happen, instead hiring the most stunt and short-sighted candidates.
As for Louis Vuitton, I have no idea. I’d like Tisci to go to Versace or Dior, but maybe he could do LV. LV needs someone fun, that’s for sure. On one hand, Jeremy Scott is an awful choice because he doesn’t seem to have the intellectual depth to go with the humour as his Moschino collections always felt gimmicky and costumey. However, you never know.
Anyway, let’s hope something is brewing !