Hedi Slimane - Designer | Page 135 | the Fashion Spot

Hedi Slimane - Designer

in the will of Armani there are rules and his wishes some leaked to the press some time ago and he said that he wanted a gradual transition of power with the people already there and not a disruption ...hedi is a disruption and a outsider.
Armani is not like other companies its governed without outside influences as armani owned it all .

i foresee a power struggle ala versace etc for a while internally, the first 5 years the members that are in the will are not aloud to list the company or sell even.

i doubt he made a list of who could be creative director of people outside the company then again you never know.

i feel for a while armani is being kept with in the familie and his close long time collaborators, till stuff goes wrong and they start to sell and fight

highly doubt hedi would be in to an italian brand but what ever he does next i am sure it will be nice project again.
 
i doubt he made a list of who could be creative director of people outside the company then again you never know.
There are some “alive” designers that he’s fond of. He mentioned them in past interviews.

So far: Jean Paul Gaultier, Dries Van Noten, John Galliano, Rick Owens (vice versa), Hedi Slimane, Stefano Pilati, Giambattista Valli.

But yes, that doesn’t mean he want those to succeed him.
 
I’m not a French speaker and Google Translate returned a word salad, but what is he going on about on his Instagram story?

“ I quit Celine, but I believe they’ll do great on their own. But don’t copy me - do your own thing, otherwise it’ll be obvious you’re recycling 👀”

That’s what I took from it, lol. I appreciate that even though you can just tap and hold a story to keep it from moving on to the next one, Hedi posted it 3 times to give people enough time to read it - truly a man of the people 🙏
 
Maybe he is still waiting for the flops at Chanel or Dior.
From the way things are looking now with JWA, Delphine will regret not putting him at Dior when she had the opportunity.

And yes, from his latest IG story, it’s very clear he hasn’t left LVMH on good terms or with a yet-to-be-announced contract at another LVMH house—because he would never have posted that story if that were the case.
 
From the way things are looking now with JWA, Delphine will regret not putting him at Dior when she had the opportunity.

And yes, from his latest IG story, it’s very clear he hasn’t left LVMH on good terms or with a yet-to-be-announced contract at another LVMH house—because he would never have posted that story if that were the case.
I disagree, to me this reads as Hedi making an point of emphasizing that he hasn't burned his bridges. I can believe he's annoyed at the recent photography direction but it also sounds like he's giving his approval to whatever changes to Celine's image are planned. Like he wants us to know he's not a hypocrite about Celine being rebuilt fit to the next guy's vision.
 
I disagree, to me this reads as Hedi making an point of emphasizing that he hasn't burned his bridges. I can believe he's annoyed at the recent photography direction but it also sounds like he's giving his approval to whatever changes to Celine's image are planned. Like he wants us to know he's not a hypocrite about Celine being rebuilt fit to the next guy's vision.

I'm glad others are chiming in because I wasn't sure how to interpret it, especially with the language barrier. I agree and think this is the overall sentiment, but with a hint of... shade...? Not necessarily a fully backhanded compliment but there's a double meaning there somewhere. I'm just thinking about how coincidental the timing was with some of his previous posts.
 
from Hedi ig stories translated for easy future ref.

I left Maison Celine in October 2024.
I have been convinced ever since—and look forward to it—that Maison Celine will brilliantly reinvent, for its advertising campaigns and corporate image, a distinctive and autonomous photographic grammar and universe, appropriate for such a promising new chapter.
This is done in a spirit of creative independence and renewal, free from any relics, borrowings, or insistent references to my photographic style
— including my advertising campaigns and films for Celine — which is self-evident.

It is with respect for oneself and others, the opportunity, pride, and happiness of each new talented creative team, and of every professional photographer as well, to create, invent, and innovate with complete vigilance, originality, and integrity, to remain in step with the times, and to ensure the future success of this beautiful Maison in a constantly evolving world of luxury and image.
I look forward to discovering this photographic revival at Celine and the new visionary image of a French House to which I remain deeply attached.

Screenshot 2025-09-06 at 22.42.20.png


Basically dont hire others to copy my photographic style and manners to a T / do your own thing as that's what the celine house deserves to have in a new chapter a evolution not a recent remake as that's the most honorable thing to do.

He is rightfully marking his stylistic territory and protecting his style and image so its not devalued by others doing a 1:1 themu copy.

He wishes them good luck at celine but not by mimicking him.

Its a honorable warning i would say :-)

He did same post Saint Laurent
 
A shady post from my fellow Cancer…
Ahaha! I totally understand that he wants to preserve the creative integrity of his aesthetic.

The underline thing is that it’s a classy dig towards management as they are the ones responsible for keeping the aesthetic for FW2025, which probably caused some confusion.

I guess Hedi is not too fond of Karim Sadli?
 
In the most recent WINTER 25 collection posts on IG, Celine added “Captured by the Maison in April 2025” to each post.
So specific and vague at the same time :lol:
Has Hedi requested this to make sure he’s absolutely not associated with the images in any way? It’s a stretch, probably, but they didn’t do that earlier this year with the ÉTÉ and FALL campaign pictures, which also weren’t by Hedi.
 
When a designer (along with a host of others on the team) has years of growth and success and very clearly tries to redefine an existing brand's aesthetic, it's unreasonable to request the entire brand do a 180 when you choose to leave. It makes total sense that Celine should continue along the same path, not give its clientele whiplash. Even more so when the designer in question's marketing eye was never truly so individual. Slim, teenage-looking models shot, simply, in black and white. Not an inspired concept. Rock 'n' Roll, 1960s, London, Los Angeles, Robert Frank ... all pretty common muses/sources of inspiration.


Not everyone is an egomaniac, needing to dramatically makeover an existing (highly successful) brand in their own image overnight, change the logo/name, change the marketing aesthetic, etc.
 
He’s not wrong, but I’m curious why he had a go at Celine but not at Saint Laurent. They’re to this day still living off his aesthetic, way more blatantly than what Celine is doing.
 
Even if Hedi wasn’t a fan and I totally get his point, the management was clever in doing it.
A drastic change in between designers could have hurt Celine. And it’s only 1 season thing as he pointed out that they are already moving on, judging by Rider’s visuals.

He’s not wrong, but I’m curious why he had a go at Celine but not at Saint Laurent. They’re to this day still living off his aesthetic, way more blatantly than what Celine is doing.
The Winter campaign by Celine was not credited and from the styling to the models to the photography, it was very close to Hedi’s aesthetic…Therefore benefiting from the confusion without having him involved.

I think at Saint Laurent, while the Hedi influence is still there, they have moved on in a way that can’t confuse people.
Vaccarello’s vision is still different from Hedi. Speaking the same language with different accents.
 
At YSL, Vaccarello tried in the first seasons new image direction. I remember Collier Schorr, Inez Vinoodh.
I actually liked the first few campaigns.
 
He’s not wrong, but I’m curious why he had a go at Celine but not at Saint Laurent. They’re to this day still living off his aesthetic, way more blatantly than what Celine is doing.
I fear it's not 2019 anymore. Vaccarello has moved on from his Hedi days,
 
A shady post from my fellow Cancer…
Ahaha! I totally understand that he wants to preserve the creative integrity of his aesthetic.

The underline thing is that it’s a classy dig towards management as they are the ones responsible for keeping the aesthetic for FW2025, which probably caused some confusion.

I guess Hedi is not too fond of Karim Sadli?
Karim has to pay for his butt injections somehow 😂😂
 

PUCK NEWS​

The Hedi Chronicles​

While the world mourned Giorgio Armani, Hedi Slimane took to Instagram to warn Celine against reusing anything he created while he was its creative director. Clearly, it was an overreaction to the work of Michael Rider. It also made him look a little out of touch with industry realities.
Hedi Slimane Kaia Gerber

On some level, though, it’s understandable that Slimane, left, wanted to protect his work so closely: As he has proudly admitted, it doesn’t change. Photo: Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for W Magazine

September 8, 2025

This past weekend, Hedi Slimane posted a note on his personal Instagram account that said, in the most careful and passive-aggressive French, that the visual language he created during his tenure as creative director of Celine was his and his alone. Slimane, who left Celine nearly a year ago and has since been replaced by Michael Rider, added that he hoped the LVMH-owned house would “brilliantly reinvent its advertising campaigns as well as its corporate image” so that it could “promote a new chapter … free from any borrowing or any insistent reference to my photographic style, including my advertising campaigns and films for Celine.”
It was a petty, funny, silly veiled threat, delivered at an inopportune moment. Just days earlier, Giorgio Armani had passed away. And while industry insiders were bemused by Slimane’s annoyance, his timing betrayed a profound lack of tact—Slimane and every other designer of his generation owe a great deal of gratitude to Mr. Armani. Many have hoped (and speculated) that Slimane might one day succeed him. The least Slimane could do was let the industry sit shiva before kicking up a public and egomaniacal fuss.
On some level, though, it’s understandable that Slimane wanted to protect his work so closely: As he has proudly admitted, it doesn’t change. There are no surprises with Slimane—not in his designs, not in his photographs, and not in the types of characters who intrigue him. He is a designer who is incapable of evolution, and I mean that in the best possible way.

I.P. Theories​

That characteristic helps to explain his behavior—at least a little. When Slimane left Celine, I was told by several people that he “took” all the imagery he created off the LVMH company drives, and that his legendary lawyer, Léon del Forno, had negotiated that the company could not use the images upon his departure. At the time, I dismissed this as a facile explanation of a far more complex situation and decided not to report on it further. But this Instagram spat made me wonder if there was at least some truth to it. (Del Forno declined to comment when I reached out about this detail; a representative for LVMH did not respond to a request for comment.)
If it is indeed true, it’s also sort of a shame. Naturally, I can understand why Slimane would want to own his intellectual property: Authors own their books, singers fight for their publishing catalogs, and Ryan Coogler negotiated the rights to own Sinners after 25 years. But it’s also true that he wasn’t working for the house of Slimane, and financing his own vision or its substantial infrastructure and marketing overhead. He was working for Celine, a brand that had many designers before him and will have many designers after him. Of course, his contributions added another dimension to the house and were unmistakably one of the reasons why Rider’s homage-filled debut collection has garnered so much praise. (After Rider’s first show, Slimane also took to Instagram, posting images of ring stacks he conceived for Celine that looked similar to the way Rider dressed his model’s hands.) I understand the desire to be protective, but there’s an argument to be made that the work isn’t his to protect. There’s no one in the world who would say Rider is copying Slimane but Slimane himself.
Anyway, it’s sort of a hoot, but also sort of a dated way of operating, and it indicates that Slimane has no current plan for what’s to come next. Now I’m also doubtful that LVMH would back a future Slimane line similar to what they did with Phoebe Philo, his predecessor at Celine. Plus, as the reinventions of Philo and Alessandro Michele have proven, it’s now harder than ever to break through, even when you have an incredibly devoted fan base. And much of Slimane’s core team has moved on, most recently Peter Utz, the beloved V.I.P. and events director, who retreated from Los Angeles back to Paris to work for Jonathan Anderson at Dior.
There is certainly a large group of people who would love Slimane to design Armani someday; both men treat consistency like a religion. But one has to wonder: Are we all too old for this sh*t?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,677
Messages
15,271,575
Members
88,803
Latest member
Karlo
Back
Top