boyfriend works there and there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that lanvin homme has in common with dior homme
belletrist said:Yes that's true haha. I can't wait for Slimane's show with Penderecki or Szymanowski as a background music(Well, not really opera, but still...classical)
 
	 
	 
 telepathicgoat said:meanwhile i continue windowshopping at lanvin homme, cause i love whats happening there!!!
is it also so extremely hot where you all live? its 28 degrees celsius here
: /
a bit much for april....
 ... but properly not a bad choice in that kind of heat!
 ... but properly not a bad choice in that kind of heat!  ... It is getting hot here in London to! B) ...
 ... It is getting hot here in London to! B) ... 
  ...
 ...Multitudes said:Let me help you a bit here! Think Phillip Glass' Einstein On The Beach or Meredith Monk' Education Of The Girlchild: An Opera ... Pure Edge! B) ...
quote]
Steve Reich maybe, too?
Or Xenakis (best way to get all the stupid fashion editors out)
verkeerd said:you are so wrong, the clothes are very subtle and introvert.
not 'luxe-gangsta-louis-vuitton' at all.
 
	 
  but it's certainly not subtle. And it's not design in the sense I understand the word. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe Dior Homme SS 06 is the epitome of the design. But Hedi's early works, although being a little bit repetitive, are certainly among the best executed pieces I've seen.
 but it's certainly not subtle. And it's not design in the sense I understand the word. Don't get me wrong, I don't believe Dior Homme SS 06 is the epitome of the design. But Hedi's early works, although being a little bit repetitive, are certainly among the best executed pieces I've seen. . I must be a fashion conservative, but for me, the concept of luxury is totally the opposite of the "techno" fabrics (I leave it to "innovative" designers or however we call them). Menswear never convinced me though. It's still to bling bling (for me
 . I must be a fashion conservative, but for me, the concept of luxury is totally the opposite of the "techno" fabrics (I leave it to "innovative" designers or however we call them). Menswear never convinced me though. It's still to bling bling (for me  )
 )tricotineacetat said:I think the concept behind Lanvin men's is not to cater to the same market as Dior Homme, it's not even meant to be about a total 'look', rather than outstanding separate pieces, in believably luxe fabrics.
 . I must be a fashion conservative, but for me, the concept of luxury is totally the opposite of the "techno" fabrics (I leave it to "innovative" designers or however we call them). Menswear never convinced me though. It's still to bling bling (for me
 . I must be a fashion conservative, but for me, the concept of luxury is totally the opposite of the "techno" fabrics (I leave it to "innovative" designers or however we call them). Menswear never convinced me though. It's still to bling bling (for me  )[/QUOTE]
 )[/QUOTE] 
 ETROsexualJ said:Exactly. Not everything has to be about ground breaking design. Lanvin is for someone who isn't afraid to wear a double breasted cashmere blazer, a purple silk with black lapel tuxedo, a huge floppy velvet bowtie, big button cardigans, athletic insipred luxe pants, washed asymetrical cut jackets, safari jackets with knit backs, etc. It's more styling and texture than design and there's nothing wrong with that.
I think he's already been approached and turned them down, but...
Hedi Slimane for Topman?
Kate Moss showed success with Topshop... maybe he could fund his own label afterward.
Hedi Slimane for H&M?
Stella did womenswear only. Maybe he'd do just menswear? Or he could do both. It'd be a good way to keep working, learn a little, and raise funds.
Why not?
I think he's already been approached and turned them down, but...
Hedi Slimane for Topman?
Kate Moss showed success with Topshop... maybe he could fund his own label afterward.
Hedi Slimane for H&M?
Stella did womenswear only. Maybe he'd do just menswear? Or he could do both. It'd be a good way to keep working, learn a little, and raise funds.
Why not?
Well I think that in both of those situations that were mentioned (Topshop & H&M) would defeat the purpose. Hedi did not want his ideals about quality and artistic credibility to be compromised so why would he go to either of these places just to make quick money? I've heard the quality of H&M is not so good and I don't know about the other shop.. Sorry, but I don't think that would be a great idea.
Also, a lot of what Hedi is known for is now being sold under an H&M (or any other brand) label.
 (anyway since then Dior is a tragedy
 (anyway since then Dior is a tragedy  )
)