In Style May 2006

[mnis]

hi guys. rachels on the cover of the new instyle this month i think she looks great in white i love the second and last dress gorgeous.Sorry its so small i'll try and post the larger ones
(source saving face forum)

 

[mnis]

The Bigger Pictures...
(same source)

 

[L.A.Gant]

She looks lovely, very nice pictures. Are they from the US In Style?

Thanks for posting

 

[mnis]

yes they are. U welcome

 

[masquerade]

wow, they usually put more famous or older celebrities on the cover. odd choice

 

[MissMagAddict]

Katrine....Thank You for the Lovely scans of Rachel Bilson from the May 2006 InStyle
Debra Messing is on the cover

Image and info from ebay

DEBRA MESSING
9 pages of article and very beautiful photos​

RACHEL BILSON
8 Pages
Photgraphs by Tesh​

JAIME PRESSLY & NADINE VELAZQUEZ
6 page​

 

[masquerade]

see, deborah messing makes a lot more sense for instyle

 

[LoveMyBoots]

wow, they usually put more famous or older celebrities on the cover. odd choice

That's what I thought. But, those are lovely dresses on rachel- especially the first one. Not very great cover, though.

 

[mnis]

oh sorry guys i thought rachel was on the cover. silly me

 

[astatine]

wow...thanks for the scans katrine! karma for you!

rachel looks great in the dresses...
they actually make her seem semi-statesque

 

[Whitelinen]

The first, long gown in beautiful.

But still I think celebrities shouldn't get the covers...Especially Debra Messing. Rachel Bilson is as bad though.

 

[porcelaindream]

she looks great here.. thanks.

 

[shoexgal]

I love rachel, I think she is fantastic herself

 

[shoexgal]

I think they should have given Rachel the cover, Debbie has had it before

 

[L.A.Gant]

I think InStyle is only fashion magazine where it makes sense to put a celebrity on the cover - it's basically the whole essence of the magazine.

I also would much rather see Rachel on the cover.

 

[MissMagAddict]

^I agree with both shoexgal & L.A.Gant
A Rachel cover would have been so fresh.

 

[vintageprincess]

she looks amazing.
they captured her well.

 

[Whitelinen]

I think InStyle is only fashion magazine where it makes sense to put a celebrity on the cover - it's basically the whole essence of the magazine.

I also would much rather see Rachel on the cover.

You're right, come to think of it.

 

[masquerade]

I think InStyle is only fashion magazine where it makes sense to put a celebrity on the cover - it's basically the whole essence of the magazine.

I also would much rather see Rachel on the cover.

yes, because unlike vogue or something, instyle is a celebrity fashion magazine, not a fashion magazine

and rachel is wayyyy to young and not well known enough for the cover considering instyles demographic. she is much more suited for teen vogue or seventeen

 

[Fabulyss]

Rachel looks gorgeous but sounds like a total idiot

"This dress is totally Edie--she's always been an icon of mine"
Yeah, right.

"This dress is totally Bridget Bardot"
Shuttup