Jackson Jury Reaches a Verdict
- Thread starter chantal
- Start date
- Status
*Ania* said:
He was acquitted because he is innocent: he may be a little weird, but absolutely not a pedofile, it was pretty obvious since the beginning to everyone nearby.Who says different knows absolutely nothing of the real issue of this case.
Very good point Ania.
I don´t know all the facts, but people who are strange for some reason, sometimes get persued just because people think they are strange, wich is an awful thing.
I have no idea if it´s a fair veridict or not, but i really hope so...
I don´t know all the facts, but people who are strange for some reason, sometimes get persued just because people think they are strange, wich is an awful thing.
I have no idea if it´s a fair veridict or not, but i really hope so...
ChinaLove said:
I think it's disgusting that they play R-Kelly's song on the radio, he's a sick pervert, that wasn't the only time that he was with an underage girl, remember when he married Aaliyah was she was only 15 or 16. I can't believe that people buy his CDs.
According to fox news the jurors didn't think he was innocent, they just thought there wasn't enough evidence to convict him. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,159474,00.html
But not all of the jurors were convinced the King of Pop had never molested a child.
"He's just not guilty of the crimes he's been charged with," said Hultman, who told The Associated Press he was one of three people on the 12-person panel who voted to acquit only after the other nine persuaded them there was reasonable doubt about the entertainer's guilt in this particular case.
Prosecutors presented testimony about Jackson's allegedly improper relationships with several boys in the early 1990s, including the son of a maid who testified that Jackson molested him during tickling session between 1987 and 1990. Another, Brett Barnes, took the stand to deny that he was molested during sleepovers at Neverland.
But Hultman said he believed it was likely that both boys had been molested. He said he voted to acquit Jackson in the current case because he had doubts about his current accuser's credibility.
"That's not to say he's an innocent man," Hultman, 62, said of Jackson.
But not all of the jurors were convinced the King of Pop had never molested a child.
"He's just not guilty of the crimes he's been charged with," said Hultman, who told The Associated Press he was one of three people on the 12-person panel who voted to acquit only after the other nine persuaded them there was reasonable doubt about the entertainer's guilt in this particular case.
Prosecutors presented testimony about Jackson's allegedly improper relationships with several boys in the early 1990s, including the son of a maid who testified that Jackson molested him during tickling session between 1987 and 1990. Another, Brett Barnes, took the stand to deny that he was molested during sleepovers at Neverland.
But Hultman said he believed it was likely that both boys had been molested. He said he voted to acquit Jackson in the current case because he had doubts about his current accuser's credibility.
"That's not to say he's an innocent man," Hultman, 62, said of Jackson.
TourniquetMX said:I heard he went down to 87 lbs!!!
Oh my god, that is so sad.
Seriously if that guy was quilty would it really affect him like this? Damn people and thier money or publicity obsessions.
Blah, I read about the jurors comments in the papers today........the main thing is Micheal is a free man and he can rest his poor body away. I hope he takes the idea of moving to another country. Get him away from all those hungry publicity money whores.
eternitygoddess
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Messages
- 7,915
- Reaction score
- 29
CNN ran the same thing.
Alpha Femme
Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2005
- Messages
- 215
- Reaction score
- 0
^^ karma for you eternitygoddess
CelineChic
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Messages
- 3,093
- Reaction score
- 1
You know all. I bet you were even in the court house, right?...Lalabel said:
Who says different knows absolutely nothing of the real issue of this case.
You have no clue what went on. No one does except for all the little boys he makes sleep in his bed.
Last edited by a moderator:
softgrey
flaunt the imperfection
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2004
- Messages
- 53,112
- Reaction score
- 523
he doesn't MAKE anyone do it dearest...celine...
they WANT to ...
the JURY found him innocent...
and that's good enough for me...
we KNOW they were in the courtroom and they heard all the facts!!!
why is anyone still talking about this???...
sheesh!!...
what about the priests molesting little boys who were never even prosecuted!!!
and we KNOW they did it for a FACT!!!
they WANT to ...
the JURY found him innocent...
and that's good enough for me...
we KNOW they were in the courtroom and they heard all the facts!!!
why is anyone still talking about this???...
sheesh!!...
what about the priests molesting little boys who were never even prosecuted!!!
and we KNOW they did it for a FACT!!!
CelineChic
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Messages
- 3,093
- Reaction score
- 1
softgrey said:he doesn't MAKE anyone do it dearest...celine...
they WANT to ...
Regardless of the fact he's still a freak and is wrong for even suggesting it dear.
Just because he was found innocent doesn't mean that he is innocent. No one knows what happened in his bed except him and all those little boys who happen to all be the same age and ethnicity. Pedos have preferences you know
Anyone who claims to know that he is innocent is just pathetic/brianwashed.
- Status
