Urban Stylin
ɐʎ ʎǝɥ
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 20,686
- Reaction score
- 3,262
Has.anyone been following the controversy from the recent H.A × Gaultier show?
Its funny that I even googled it and there's nothing about it online.
There’s an old runway image w/ these brightly-colored men’s suits, and THAT definitely looks like Haider's cut from his previous womenswear shows.Just checked Jurgi's instagram account and Haider's been copying him for ages apparently. That's embarrassing.
Just checked Jurgi's instagram account and Haider's been copying him for ages apparently. That's embarrassing.
is this for real... people need to cut the sh*t with the cancelling stuff.A vintage store I follow on ig (vaniitasstore, specialises in Belgian and Japanese designers) just pulled all their Haider Ackermann that was for sale, from their store on being told of this.
is this for real... people need to cut the sh*t with the cancelling stuff.
The Gaultier look seems like a blatant rip off and I'd be pissed too, but the other photos Jurgi posted don't really read as "stolen" to me. They look like interpretations of Jurgi's technique done by an admirer presented in a way that "iykyk", and it's on the uncultured swine to F off and not pick it up. I think it may be worse that Haider doesn't know his audience anymore. The problem with the trend of yelling "copying and stealing" in the context of fashion now is that the people who consume this stuff are so dumb and braindead and already disinterested enough to the point where they would never be in a situation to pick up on a reference that a designer makes because they don't dig deeper into an interest greater than scrolling on instagram or the pastime of making terminally online attacks on people to feel morally superior. If that is who you are presenting your work to, you WILL be bombarded by virtue signaling hamsters when they find out what your interests are and how you integrate them into your work without putting your entire works cited in show notes or something.
There is always a fine line between "homage/admire/tribute" and ripoff and when the original (not some online vigilante) calls you out maybe it's time to revaluate yourself.
I mean we wouldn't call what Proenza duos did to Phoebe or Virgil to Walter an homage.
I think it is all about the intention behind it, which in this case it's still baffling to me because this not only involved Haider but JPG's name also being attached to it. I want to know why did he do that considering that he has accessed 47 years' worth of archives. Was that not enough? It's put on a stain to my favorite couture this season.
Maybe they should all do a Marc Jacobs and stated your reference firsthand so nobody can call you out.
I do think it's a bit silly to pull his work from stores. I don't think that store has Haider for JPG yet so what they're pulling is Haider's stuff, and they pretend to care about research and understanding the garments they sell so.. how did that fly over their heads? I'm not a buyer or even work in fashion and even I know Haider rides on others' work. I don't know, the timing seems a bit hypocritical but um sure congrats, you got your ethical side in order and ran to instagram to let everyone know, woohoo..
Gaultier did dress like this at least once in parisian fw couture with feather wigs and veils. It was black, one shoulder and with bow beltAnd then there's the purple gown w/ the big, rounded shoulders. I'm convinced that's some golden-age couture from yesteryear. I don't know if it's a shape from Cardin, Balenciaga, YSL, whomever...but it's not JPG, I'm sure.