feature and article in i-D March 2008
*please do not quote images*
my scans
whats the name of this girl?
Last edited by a moderator:
feature and article in i-D March 2008
*please do not quote images*
my scans
Hm, maybe I just have a different set of visual references when it comes to MMM, but I have to say that I quite disagree. I've always considered Margiela's collections quite remarkable in their consistency, both thematically and aesthetically. In these early collections you can spot a lot of the elements that reoccured in his work over the duration of his career, particularly during the first ten years: the long silhouette, garment segments, chunky knitwear, pieced/recycled sweaters, aprons, slips, oversized garments, oversized fastenings, the plastic bag, zippers running along the entire length of garment...and I think those incredible jackets and coats and unmistakably Margiela.i have to say that i find it really hard to recognize mmm in these collections...
i don't know if he had really come into his own at this point...
i do think it is nice to compare these early collections to what eventually became his signature design style later on...
...this man has been there and done it decades before it was considered so hip. and he is still so immensely under-appreciated for his early work.
You're right, Margiela was embraced by the fashion cognoscenti from the get-go. I don't think he was overhyped, though.I may be in the minority in feeling Margiela has always been overhyped-- right from the beginning of his career. I remember seeing his first collection being featured in ELLE USA: Broken plates made into a vest, raw hems with loose sequins, all held together by a long and lean silhouette. And I remember seeing those all-white hand-painted canvas rucksacks with the scribbles and graffitis all over them at Holts... He was very-well embraced internationally from the beginning.
I also remember another designer that has a similar aesthetic, and design philosophy as Margiela--very industrial, recyclable and sustainable fashion. This was Jean Colonna (where is he now?), but it was always Margiela that got the spotlight from the beginning.
In the same issues of Collezioni that I used for these scans, there are lots of pictures of Jean Colonna collections. While there may have been superficial similarities to their aesthetics, they were really miles apart. Margiela was always agressively conceptual. His work was usually an exploration of the idea of a garment, e.g. using the garment linings as standalone garments, or scaling items up to double their normal size. Colonna's work, as runner said, was more about creating a look.
Colonna is still in business, btw, and he still makes cool, wearable clothes - just as he did 20 years ago.
The short answer is probably "yes." I think that after a while, the white paint became something like the MMM version of a logo print. It's worth keeping in mind, however, that when they first started doing it, overpainting an entire garment - or just one side of the garment, as they often did - with a single color was actually pretty novel. Since then it's become part and parcel of their brand identity (and therefore, banal).However, I still can't understand why anyone would pay for those paint-covered rucksacks, jean jackets, (deliberately) tacky tees, and toe-capped shoes... Can't you do it yourself? I mean, wasn't that the point? Or would that not be a MMM original?