Lola701
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2014
- Messages
- 11,674
- Reaction score
- 25,524
You don’t like his work so you are biaised anyway lol.i think blazy did always blazy the overworked craft at margiela we can see from his academie years as to now at BV ....and he had a hard time letting his shows or look book stylings breath or make a cohesive or edited chapters in his collections ...so clearly he has his signature (Obsessions with overworked and craft )
don't you think his aesthetic is that: overworked crafty ?
No I think his aesthetic is very architectural. He is good at tailoring, I still think about the egg peacoats from his first collection and how very structured his work is overall.
His approach to decoration is very artisanal indeed.
But I think it’s interesting to see that interpretation from Margiela to Bottega Veneta. There’s a sense of modernity in his work but I think what characterized his BV was his take on bourgeoisie. It was very bourgeois.
I think at Chanel, unlike Margiela or Bottega Veneta, he will have plenty of room and ressources to really experiment.
Except maybe for his first 2 and his last collection for BV, there was always a sense of too much ideas that were not helped by the styling.
At Chanel, an experimentation for Haute Couture can be developed in Metiers d’arts or RTW. I think about when Karl started the embroidered tweed on organza or the concrete embroideries. Those techniques were further developed from Couture to RTW.
What I know we will get from his Chanel is clean cut! No more sloppy bulky tweed suits like the ones form the last Metiers d’Arts.
Despite the image of Chanel, Karl never stopped to push things forward so it leaves a room for anyone to really go there when I think that the heritage of Coco alone can be somehow limiting.