Xone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
- Messages
- 4,560
- Reaction score
- 3,040
Meaning?…It’s not him.
Watch Live & Comment... The 2025 Golden Globe Awards!
Meaning?…It’s not him.
meaning it’s not him.Meaning?…
also I LOVE I LOVE that Raf must be hysterical about Pieter and Matthieu being top contenders for Chanel and more relevant than him in the fashion conversation right now
Bernie isn't interested in fashion anymore: when he goes to Italy it's to buy top location real estate for his Cheval Blanc hotels in Venezia, Como and Firenze, but not anything fashion-related.Dior by Hedi MIGHT get me to forgive Bernie.
Bernie is basically only socially acceptable because of Hedi and NG. Without them he is a unscrupulous financier who thinks having bags made by slaves is smart management.
Without HS and NG Bernie has no aspirations of class. No legitimacy and no mandate.
As a relative fashion outsider (but who loves to learn about designers and the industry) could you explain why Raf is so disliked? He seemed to be the height of "coolness" over a decade ago, or maybe before Calvin Klein, and now I only read negative things about him. Is it that he has simply lost his touch? Or that people feel he never was that talented in the first place? How do people feel about his time at Dior? I am just curious. Thanks!also I LOVE I LOVE that Raf must be hysterical about Pieter and Matthieu being top contenders for Chanel and more relevant than him in the fashion conversation right now
And Bernie just renegated on Venezia; someelse bought the Bauer hôtel he visited.Bernie isn't interested in fashion anymore: when he goes to Italy it's to buy top location real estate for his Cheval Blanc hotels in Venezia, Como and Firenze, but not anything fashion-related.
LOL, I have to recall what you all were talking about before realizing that there is no way it could be Bernie Sanders!Y'all calling him Bernie like he's a good old friend of yours lmaoo.
I still see a lot of people like his work for but it's overly intellectual and sometimes lacks heart and soul. His high-concept Americana failed to appeal to a broader consumer base. Also was a commercial disaster. The modern minimalism he found success with at Jil Sander didn't translate as well at Dior. Sure some insiders loved it, but it wasn't the same Dior that many fell in love with during the Galliano years. Sure Prada is doing well for now, that triangle definitely helps. But he doesn't have as distinct of a voice against Miuccia who is the heart and soul of the brand.As a relative fashion outsider (but who loves to learn about designers and the industry) could you explain why Raf is so disliked? He seemed to be the height of "coolness" over a decade ago, or maybe before Calvin Klein, and now I only read negative things about him. Is it that he has simply lost his touch? Or that people feel he never was that talented in the first place? How do people feel about his time at Dior? I am just curious. Thanks!
Maybe because after his glorious days at his own brand and a fabulous tenure at Jil Sander, it became quite apparent that he owed those success to his number 2.As a relative fashion outsider (but who loves to learn about designers and the industry) could you explain why Raf is so disliked? He seemed to be the height of "coolness" over a decade ago, or maybe before Calvin Klein, and now I only read negative things about him. Is it that he has simply lost his touch? Or that people feel he never was that talented in the first place? How do people feel about his time at Dior? I am just curious. Thanks!
Still sure it's not him?...meaning it’s not him.
Lola put it much more eloquently than I ever could already, but to add to it, I think he, at some point, ran out of ideas to translate into any "elevated" product. His own line, though loved for his slim designs and youth-oriented novelties, was pretty poorly made, not even talking about the horrible RAF line, which is okay in the beginning, but needs to evolve as your brand and customer base evolves. Instead, Raf started to choose a very, very superfical reference (Mapplethorpe, Warhol,...) each season and slapped the correlating images on pretty banal clothing, that the original customer had long grown out of and the new customer could get "hotter" from Vetements at the time. Archive bros, arguably Rafs biggest clientele, didn't want his new stuff, they wanted his older collections, which is why pretty much everything past 2010 ended up on sale.As a relative fashion outsider (but who loves to learn about designers and the industry) could you explain why Raf is so disliked? He seemed to be the height of "coolness" over a decade ago, or maybe before Calvin Klein, and now I only read negative things about him. Is it that he has simply lost his touch? Or that people feel he never was that talented in the first place? How do people feel about his time at Dior? I am just curious. Thanks!
This is Dries, yes? Thank you for your thoughtful response!But tbh, it all comes from here anyways:
till its not official why should he not post his own work....... next week we should have the news as rumored to be some statement the week after the show ...so we can move on from this :-) and just congratulate Hedi :-)Sorry to digress but Matthieu is still posting on his stories about Bottega Veneta. For someone that is, allegedly, no longer employed by Bottega, that seems slightly odd, no? Theoretically if he is already on board at Chanel, why is he still promoting his work at BV?
lamojust congratulate Hedi :-)
No, this is Helmut Lang (Spring Summer 1998), who was the predecessor of people like Raf, Hedi, Nicolas and later on Phoebe. Raf is especially heavy influenced by him, his whole tenure at Calvin Klein was just adaptations of HL designs. Here he is wearing a HL Jacket at the end of one of his CK shows.This is Dries, yes? Thank you for your thoughtful response!