Matthieu Blazy - Designer, Creative Director of Chanel | Page 78 | the Fashion Spot

Matthieu Blazy - Designer, Creative Director of Chanel

This comment on social seems to be about Blazy ( or JWA but i don't see JWA being shy to say what he wants ) from zeitgeist podcast on paris fashion week :

*The reality is far less glorious. Collaborators are less impressed. Very unsure, doubting, misses vision and knowledge on how Couture works, he doesn’t know how to use the different ateliers at his disposal. And he doesn’t seem interested. He’s extremely vague in his indications and lets others do the job. He is very turned into himself and doesn’t look people into the eyes…

This sounds like classic JWA, and that may explain why the quality of Dior's red carpet teasers was so terrible. Don't forget Blazy has couture background, and he's much more nerdy when it comes to fabrications and techniques than Anderson. When compared, Anderson's work is superficially nerdy, and he's more of a curator than a real designer. That worked well at Loewe, but the longer he is at Dior, the more I doubt about that approach being the right one. And if anyone lacks technical knowledge, it must be him.
 
This sounds like classic JWA, and that may explain why the quality of Dior's red carpet teasers was so terrible. Don't forget Blazy has couture background, and he's much more nerdy when it comes to fabrications and techniques than Anderson. When compared, Anderson's work is superficially nerdy, and he's more of a curator than a real designer. That worked well at Loewe, but the longer he is at Dior, the more I doubt about that approach being the right one. And if anyone lacks technical knowledge, it must be him.
Can be but JWA seems more assertive even in his first show concept is clear even is outcome is weak and researched and not shy at all. and agree with the rest on him being superficial nerdy arty type that Blazy also falls under with Raf and Pieter.

Blazy you mean at margiela couture ? for me does not count at level of Dior or Chanel HC and i hated his margiela work even then and i did not even know what he would have become at BV even back than.

Blazy in his own words admits to being overwhelmed by archive etc and he lacks direction at BV and able to chose and these are things that come up in his own interview with his own words.
 
Collaborators are less impressed. Very unsure, doubting, misses vision and knowledge on how Couture works, he doesn’t know how to use the different ateliers at his disposal. And he doesn’t seem interested. He’s extremely vague in his indications and lets others do the job. He is very turned into himself and doesn’t look people into the eyes…
Maybe the owners should not have assumed that he is a fashion genius and should have asked him how he planned to work with all the ateliers...
There was clearly a DD issue.
 
Maybe the owners should not have assumed that he is a fashion genius and should have asked him how he planned to work with all the ateliers...
There was clearly a DD issue.
the owners are not into the fashion details you saw in the interview vogue piece one of the owner said let's not talk about fashion /work because if your here means you are good to Blazy for his interview ...meaning the company did preselection and proposed him for the final person

you can see how traitor vibes and easy moved fashion ceo´s are KL was genius when he was alive we do things the way we do we are chanel bla bla bla and as soon as there is a new CD in the house old way does not work now we are much faster as Blazy changed and works ahead of time not like karl last minute etc .....bla bla

If you have vision as CEO when KL passed you could have had the vision already to change the system to be more on time with VV, why wait years later.

You see he said also the one star system of CD does not work any more ... business needs first :) make faster .....have collection ready ahead etc ......

optimization x 100 is key like Kering new ceo from car world make faster and respond on time to feedback of market needs.

its just another rat race only difference ist planned ahead the fashion wont get better or more creative or authentic.
 
the owners are not into the fashion details you saw in the interview vogue piece one of the owner said let's not talk about fashion /work because if your here means you are good to Blazy for his interview ...meaning the company did preselection and proposed him for the final person

you can see how traitor vibes and easy moved fashion ceo´s are KL was genius when he was alive we do things the way we do we are chanel bla bla bla and as soon as there is a new CD in the house old way does not work now we are much faster as Blazy changed and works ahead of time not like karl last minute etc .....bla bla

If you have vision as CEO when KL passed you could have had the vision already to change the system to be more on time with VV, why wait years later.

You see he said also the one star system of CD does not work any more ... business needs first :) make faster .....have collection ready ahead etc ......

optimization x 100 is key like Kering new ceo from car world make faster and respond on time to feedback of market needs.

its just another rat race only difference ist planned ahead the fashion wont get better or more creative or authentic.
which means they won't be able to fix the ss2026 collection.
of course 2025 financials would be better than thought. Everyone is buying everything in store now!
 
Maybe the owners should not have assumed that he is a fashion genius and should have asked him how he planned to work with all the ateliers...
There was clearly a DD issue.
Isn’t the word genius thrown to easily?
Maybe they just assumed that he is a capable talented working designer…
which means they won't be able to fix the ss2026 collection.
of course 2025 financials would be better than thought. Everyone is buying everything in store now!
I really think that the « things to fix » aren’t that important. It’s not like brands makes the biggest of their sales from the runway collections. With the pre-collections, the commercial collection of the runway collection, the pre-orders, there’s enough stuff.
I don’t think they will produce a ton a beaded tweed suits.

The women buying Chanel have always bought knitwear and tweed the most.

And then again, the conversation has been so much about the vocal unhappy clientele…Therés a lot unsaid about the people who left Chanel and who may be interested in coming back to it. I don’t think the Erica lady pre-ordered a Chanel/Charvet shirt but it will potentially be the HIT of this collection.

The bags, in reality are quite classic still. So much fuss about the wired 2.55 when they will probably just make the 2.55 in silver and gold patent leather.

I wonder if the new spark in Chanel will brought people back into the 2.55 which in reality was totally left out at Chanel for a longtime even more with the price increase (for a bag that didn’t sell a lot at all).

Out of all the brands that debuted this season, Chanel is really the one I’m the less worry for…By FAR!
 
which means they won't be able to fix the ss2026 collection.
of course 2025 financials would be better than thought. Everyone is buying everything in store now!
i assume Show collection tweaked /fixed yes as its has to be produced still and before placing orders they could have tweaked it as needed
P = Printemps Collection Spring Act 1 released January in stores ......is bought already and production is at end
this i doubt any tweak is done too late.

i think its more the commercial drops without a show like P (spring) ACT 1 what the guest already worn to the ss26 S (spring) Act 2 show, coco beach, neige B ( fall )act 1 etc are designed and produced and then close to the date you have the communication and drop in store very soon after.


easy recap:

Each year Chanel releases 6 separate ready to wear (rtw) collections which includes new seasonal and classic bags, shoes, jewelry, and small leather goods.

Each collection is designated with the corresponding year and then a letter representing the collection (e.g. 2C). The exact release date of each collection varies slightly each year.
  • C = Cruise Collection (released November of the year before to January) SHOW CRUISE
  • P = Printemps Collection Spring Act 1 (released January to March) DROP only*
  • S = Summer Collection Spring Act 2 (released March to June) SHOW SS
  • A = Autumn Collection Pre-Fall, Metiers D’Arts (released May to September) SHOW PRE FALL
  • B = Fall/Winter Act 1 (released June to October) DROP only*
  • K = Fall/Winter Act 2 (released August to November) SHOW FW
+ SS HAUTE COUTURE SHOW
+ FW HAUTE COUTURE SHOW

+ COCO BEACH DROP only*
+ COCO NEIGE DROP only*



its allot :-)
 
Isn’t the word genius thrown to easily?
Maybe they just assumed that he is a capable talented working designer…

I really think that the « things to fix » aren’t that important. It’s not like brands makes the biggest of their sales from the runway collections. With the pre-collections, the commercial collection of the runway collection, the pre-orders, there’s enough stuff.
I don’t think they will produce a ton a beaded tweed suits.

The women buying Chanel have always bought knitwear and tweed the most.

And then again, the conversation has been so much about the vocal unhappy clientele…Therés a lot unsaid about the people who left Chanel and who may be interested in coming back to it. I don’t think the Erica lady pre-ordered a Chanel/Charvet shirt but it will potentially be the HIT of this collection.

The bags, in reality are quite classic still. So much fuss about the wired 2.55 when they will probably just make the 2.55 in silver and gold patent leather.

I wonder if the new spark in Chanel will brought people back into the 2.55 which in reality was totally left out at Chanel for a longtime even more with the price increase (for a bag that didn’t sell a lot at all).

Out of all the brands that debuted this season, Chanel is really the one I’m the less worry for…By FAR!
The women buying Chanel have always bought knitwear and tweed the most.
Sure but knits with logo and fantasy designs and frills on it etc.......... not grey uniqlo knits or same knits you can get at Barrie

I understand logo free but these seem more design free as well. lol

IMG_6665.webpc265205617-wool-cardigan-with-ribbon-detail-hazelnut-packshot.jpg930 Euro Barrie (same factory of Chanel)

IMG_6655.webpC200354821-ultra-fine-cashmere-round-neck-jumper-packshot.jpg
IMG_6658.webpc305247001-cashmere-cardigan-with-a-tartan-motif-packshot_1d0549ea-87ce-4db9-9c18-9cf9f9b2023a.webp
IMG_6660.webpc166219160-v-neck-cashmere-cardigan-niveous-white-packshot-1.webpc85543107-denim-cashmere-and-cotton-skirt-niveous-m8843-white-packshot.webp
 

CHANEL President of Fashion says a new designer will not magically fix problems​

Posted On October 30, 2025 CPP-LUXURY

While many indicate that a new designer will magically fix their problems, CHANEL‘s President of Fashion, Bruno Pavlovski says in an interview to Le Figaro that one cannot design his way out of a supply chain crisis. The Karl system is dead.

Pavlovsky admits they were “enchaining collections without time to think about industrialization.” Now Matthieu Blazy has them planning Métiers d’art while delivering ready-to-wear. Revolutionary? No. Basic operational excellence? Yes.

The post-COVID gold rush made everyone lazy. Open stores everywhere, slap a logo on it, charge EUR 5000. Except people aren’t stupid. They stopped coming to boutiques not because of “luxury fatigue”—they have less money, weaker currencies, and better things to do than buy your 47th variation of the same bag.

Chanel grew in 2025 while others crashed. Not only because of Blazy’s arrival. Because they never stopped being Chanel. The industry wants a creative savior. Pavlovsky’s telling you to fix your operations.


Bruno Pavlovsky: "The renewal brought by Matthieu Blazy will allow Chanel to shine for the next twenty years."​

EXCLUSIVE - The president of the fashion activities, who started under the reign of Karl Lagerfeld, looks back on the extent of the changes made in the house on rue Cambon since the arrival of its new artistic director.
By Hélène Guillaume FIGARO

October 7, 2025

Matthieu Blazy 's first collection , the reorganization of the house, the role of an artistic director and the economic context… A few hours before the first show of its new designer, Bruno Pavlovsky unveiled the new Chanel era .

Bruno Pavlovsky - I find Matthieu's interpretation of the house and Mademoiselle Chanel very interesting. We're still at Chanel, but a slightly different Chanel. He cultivates the same approach to the materials that form our foundation, but he twists them to create this unique look. This first collection contains many avenues that Matthieu has already envisioned exploring for future seasons. In recent years, we've tended to confine ourselves to certain codes; the objective of this first show was to revitalize the brand's fundamentals, to give them a new creative dimension.

What has changed in the organization of the house since Matthieu Blazy's arrival?

He truly opened our eyes to the need for anticipation and planning. We were still operating under Karl Lagerfeld's system, churning out collections without sometimes having the time to consider the industrialization of the pieces that would be shown on the runway.
Matthieu begins his research and imagines his silhouettes much earlier, and he's able to provide direction to the studio and workshops quite early on. Over the past six months, we've implemented a new organizational structure so that our teams and manufacturers can work further in advance, and we're already reaping the rewards: following the ready-to-wear show, Matthieu finished the Coco Beach collection; the Métiers d'Art collection, which will be shown in early December, is already well underway; the January haute couture collection is launched, and we're even starting to discuss the next ready-to-wear collection for March. It's a new way of working that gives us greater flexibility and efficiency in delivering products to stores.
This is the best guarantee for Chanel to continue to be a market leader and what will allow the brand to shine for the next twenty years.

Do you think this creative renewal at the helm of many houses will allow the luxury industry to emerge from the current crisis?

Unfortunately, I doubt that will be enough. Certainly, for houses like Chanel, the "spark" created by an artistic director is fundamental to positioning the brand image. But to be able to generate several billion in revenue, extremely robust organizations are needed to maximize this creative impulse. Manufacturing, deliveries, and even store management are all separate issues. The role of an artistic director has a beginning and an end; the all-powerful artistic director is not, in my opinion, a good idea for brands. As for the economic context, Chanel had a better year in 2025 than predicted, and we have, in fact, returned to growth.
The slowdown in the sector is mainly linked to the Chinese market. Some have spoken of consumer fatigue with luxury.
I believe that people are coming to the stores less often because they have less money due to the economic situation in their country or because their currency is weakening. That said, it's true that the sector, which experienced three years of very strong growth post-Covid, has sometimes lacked ambition in its creative vision and execution. We can proclaim that everything is fine everywhere, we can open boutiques and pop-up stores left and right, but if we rest on our laurels and become commonplace, if we fail to inspire enough, customers will lose interest.
I hope that this new generation, to which Matthieu belongs, will allow us to rethink all of this.


BLazy quotes in figaro post show:

My first day at Chanel was a wonderful day, a joyful day where I met everyone… Then I went to see the heritage collection. And there, I felt overwhelmed. I didn’t know where to begin. It was too beautiful. There were too many stories. I was stuck ,” Matthieu Blazy began telling journalists shortly after his show.
“So I decided to stop looking at her work and instead read about her life. And, in a book from the 1960s, there was this photo of Gabrielle Chanel during her relationship with Boy Capel, where she’s wearing a man’s shirt. I looked into where that shirt came from and discovered it was a Charvet , that Chanel and Boy were Charvet clients. This discovery allowed me to unlock the first door.” The starting point for this collection is the paradox of Gabrielle Chanel, who, by day, wears this men's garment, which makes her equal to the man she loves, and, by night, becomes a great seductress who fully embraces her femininity. LOL

inspired by a 1964 suit with strange stripes by Chanel, but which could have been made from a fabric from South America, Africa, or Asia. And which refers to the fact that the house is French, but the company is international and has clients from all walks of life .”


"Oddly enough, I was never anxious while I was at work. The pressure started as soon as I got home. But I think the most stressed person in this room isn't me, it's my mother."

Susanna Nicoletti comment on the article:​

Author and Columnist|Fashion and Luxury Higher Education Director

But he is allowing the opposite at Chanel.
Karl was an immense genius and a team worker. And Blazy is very very far away from a creative director having little knowledge of how to make a dress fit.

The Brand in luxury comes first and customer loyalty is the most important objective. The industry needs creatives at the service of the business, which is not art. Customers pay their own excessive salaries and they do not even take them into consideration.
Karl was a great example and a benchmark to follow, not a statue to take down.

CHANEL is becoming a messy and tacky brand.

- A$ap Rocky dressed in an orange pajama like in an Havaianas spot and being everywhere from Dior to many other brands with no purpose other than make money as a celebrity instead of issuing new records as an artist
- Margaret Qualley "covered" by clothes that do no match with each other and even less with the guy trying to propose her
- The setting .....shabby

Far away are the times of the great Chanel and it is impossible to understand why the Wertheimer are allowing Nair and Pavlosky to erase such a prestigious brand.
Do you know that it is impossible to find videos of Karl Lagerfeld shows at the Chanel Youtube. They have all been cancelled from the most visible ones, you need to accurately search in the "least recent" which is a shame for Chanel and a disrespect for Karl.

We know how it will end this trend started by Alessandro Michele and Demna, don't we?
 
I feel the same way as these comments on the nyc filming of the chanel ad or preview film ofthe dec show:

In my opinion, visual literacy and standards have dramatically fallen and people simply don’t care about what they look at as long as they can process key points within several seconds. This means as long as you can process the brand logo, what’s happening and people in the photo, the rest is meaningless.

So on the one hand yes, as someone who appreciates quality imagery, this is awful.
However maybe this is on point for contemporary attention spans for the audience the brand think it should be taking to.

Trivialization in luxury is suicide.

I think that given ASAP Rocky closeness and affection with Rihanna this is also pretty fake and somehow disturbing, same for Margaret Qualley that is married and ASAP Rocky is a father of three kids on top of this proposal concept with Cartier box in hand.

While Karl´s period seems to be dismantled and many brands today engage in the sort of erasure , it's also important to note that Chanel has a long history of doing this. Lagerfeld was not the first creative director to lead Chanel after Coco's death–Gaston Berthelot, Ramón Esparza, Philippe Guibourgé, and Frances Stein all led the house before Lagerfeld came along. All have been intentionally deleted from the house's public-facing history.
Even the Chanel Catwalk book from a few years ago only included Lagerfeld's collections and not Coco's. It's a very strange trend.
 
The way Pavlosky talked about Chanel seems like he was talking about a fast-fashion brand. It seems he has forgotten he is talking about a fashion luxury brand (all that industrialization and fast production babbling is going against the very core of the brand). No wonder why he chose to show that video of 2.55 handbags being mass made in a factory, as if they were making any other product.

And meanwhile...Leena is interested in AI. Maybe they are thinking about replacing Blazy with a cheap, more faster (and equally boring) alternative:

Chanel’s CEO went to Microsoft HQ and asked ChatGPT to show her a picture of her company’s leadership. They were all men in suits
 
The women buying Chanel have always bought knitwear and tweed the most.
Sure but knits with logo and fantasy designs and frills on it etc.......... not grey uniqlo knits or same knits you can get at Barrie

I understand logo free but these seem more design free as well. lol

View attachment 1427014View attachment 1427019930 Euro Barrie (same factory of Chanel)

View attachment 1427016View attachment 1427022
View attachment 1427017View attachment 1427020
View attachment 1427018View attachment 1427025View attachment 1427026
C’est un mal nécessaire!
Drastic but necessary. Less Erica the IG woman.

I’m not at all attached to the image that Chanel has had in the last 5 years at all. It’s great that Virginie sold a lot of clothes but you won’t convince me that it’s not a good thing to move from that.

I also experienced a time when Chanel was less logo-fied and when a good CC button was enough.

This palette cleanser is a win for me. I welcome that with a great joy.
And if they have a little dip in sales because of that? Ok and then!? They will comeback around. Fashion is a cycle anyway.

For the first time in a long time I’m actually interested in going to go to a Chanel store to buy RTW. I couldn’t care at all that some clients don’t like it lol.
 
C’est un mal nécessaire!
Drastic but necessary. Less Erica the IG woman.

I’m not at all attached to the image that Chanel has had in the last 5 years at all. It’s great that Virginie sold a lot of clothes but you won’t convince me that it’s not a good thing to move from that.

I also experienced a time when Chanel was less logo-fied and when a good CC button was enough.

This palette cleanser is a win for me. I welcome that with a great joy.
And if they have a little dip in sales because of that? Ok and then!? They will comeback around. Fashion is a cycle anyway.

For the first time in a long time I’m actually interested in going to go to a Chanel store to buy RTW. I couldn’t care at all that some clients don’t like it lol.
I always say 2 wrongs don't make a right :-) VV was doing very commercial clothes as KL had heavy logo as well but that's the store level merch that is at every big brand lucky enough to even have a logo. thats mass taste and goes beyond VV or KL lack of portions or modernity or discretion at times.

Issue is and many pro new chanel don't want to be honest about we have same problems with Blazy´s Chanel we had with VV and KL like frumpiness and bad proportions now it just has a phoebe look to it all (which a call woke Chanel*) instead of the barbie Chanel we know of the past full of logos.

Its not black & white about logo bad, no logo good either can work or not work , this i think is not even the main issue for people as it has shown the mass buys into quite luxury as well or the updated phoebe look even seeing all the dupe version in high and low fashions.

I love a rest as well but act 1 and the show are not even related in spirit or fit or file rouge, and thats the big issue with blazy its chaotic with no direction or building up a collection let alone a vision of the house we seen it at BV , instead your blinded by the next shiny object in each collection that shows some craft work bla bla step back it all is just as quickly gone as it came.

Its very obsolete design very fast fashion , what some allot of old celine by phoebe also had toward her end years.

price is right.jpgceline-006.webp

New is great but with a house like chanel it should look chanel 50-80% of the look if not what's the point , clients can break it down but here it's broken down already so much that 27k for an abstract flower unflattering tent top is a stretch to far in the wrong direction.

Wrong idea new or old is a wrong idea...he does not have the discipline nor strong clear vision to even play with wrong ideas and make them right or interesting.

I don't care what anybody likes in that respect when i shop that's not unique feeling most of have any ways, but we are talking here about brands from a top level down experience , spirit of a house , branding, creativity of creative director, business strategy, client service,art direction , quality of product quality of ideas, sentiment on the fashion world , etc etc

Clients not liking is about feedback of their base, its another indicator when we speak about brands taste or values etc.(not about personal validation of their existence )

Like i find Pierre Hardy own brand extremely tacky design department store merch from the 00´s, Louboutin is just as tacky as well but in a loud sex shop infused design merch perspective, Pierre Hard at Hermes does in context of hermes high jewelry amazing stuff and even like the beauty design, at balenciaga he did amazing concept for shoes. t
For me that's the nuances when i talk about designers and clients feedback or vision or any other details, not in a B&W way.


*(Woke Chanel)
Is a new phenomenon i notice that when design has primarily phoebe philo abstraction of conventional shapes or ideas of good taste rich and intelligent dressing it's more emancipated/free women then say a MGC or VV design that caters to a more widely classic standings of women's fashion that is pretty or beautiful therefore seen as old fashioned and backwards..... not liberated mind.
 
...men in suits that fit.
lol Where Blazy new Chanel also started...from his own mens suit jacket..... just like Eve (a woman) was made from the rib of Adam (a man) in paradise by God lol
Same how coco without her man in her life would have not be Chanel today according to Blazy research.

Fits well with this the fantastic 3 belgium erasure colonial esthetics, how Pieter erase old Alaia like its not modern not of today whatever he said in one of his interviews , how Raf likes to one up Miuccia in explaining the Prada collections and guiding her out to take a bow like she needs help every time.

All 3 are very condescending in approach and mentality..... does not matter they do it with a shy or nervous smile its the same thing.
 
Same how coco without her man in her life would have not be Chanel today according to Blazy research.

Fits well with this the fantastic 3 belgium erasure colonial esthetics, how Pieter erase old Alaia like its not modern not of today whatever he said in one of his interviews , how Raf likes to one up Miuccia in explaining the Prada collections and guiding her out to take a bow like she needs help every time.

All 3 are very condescending in approach and mentality..... does not matter they do it with a shy or nervous smile its the same thing.
First Blazy's white shirt about her love for Boy Capel. Next Margaret Qualley being proposed to by ASAP 🙄
 
First Blazy's white shirt about her love for Boy Capel. Next Margaret Qualley being proposed to by ASAP 🙄
hehe nyc metro love story ..trilogy about love story like his BV Milan trilogy 3 shows about milan style lol

then some on world travel at BV fast forward to chanel was world travel again lol even out of space this time because as kid he would go to the planetarium 🤷‍♀️ concept!!!

shirt because she worn his shirt next day bla bla sure ....but in BV he did so many shirts as well not only the leather shirt stunt ..that's what i mean with lazy blazy taking the easy way what he knows already.

like he makes parallels in order to do same things as always mix that with a confused crafty show voila new disruptive fashions for 15 second ig reel brain of info retention.
 
hehe nyc metro love story ..trilogy about love story like his BV Milan trilogy 3 shows about milan style lol

then some on world travel at BV fast forward to chanel was world travel again lol even out of space this time because as kid he would go to the planetarium 🤷‍♀️ concept!!!

shirt because she worn his shirt next day bla bla sure ....but in BV he did so many shirts as well not only the leather shirt stunt ..that's what i mean with lazy blazy taking the easy way what he knows already.

like he makes parallels in order to do same things as always mix that with a confused crafty show voila new disruptive fashions for 15 second ig reel brain of info retention.
At BV he released that ugly Quadronno bag (basically a dustbag with thin leather straps), at CHANEL I'm waiting for the Harlem bag.
 
The dress he did for Nicole is really mediocre, if not bad. I expect more than sloppy draping from someone whose supposed obsession with craft is his only characteristic.
 
I always say 2 wrongs don't make a right :-) VV was doing very commercial clothes as KL had heavy logo as well but that's the store level merch that is at every big brand lucky enough to even have a logo. thats mass taste and goes beyond VV or KL lack of portions or modernity or discretion at times.

Issue is and many pro new chanel don't want to be honest about we have same problems with Blazy´s Chanel we had with VV and KL like frumpiness and bad proportions now it just has a phoebe look to it all (which a call woke Chanel*) instead of the barbie Chanel we know of the past full of logos.

Its not black & white about logo bad, no logo good either can work or not work , this i think is not even the main issue for people as it has shown the mass buys into quite luxury as well or the updated phoebe look even seeing all the dupe version in high and low fashions.

I love a rest as well but act 1 and the show are not even related in spirit or fit or file rouge, and thats the big issue with blazy its chaotic with no direction or building up a collection let alone a vision of the house we seen it at BV , instead your blinded by the next shiny object in each collection that shows some craft work bla bla step back it all is just as quickly gone as it came.

Its very obsolete design very fast fashion , what some allot of old celine by phoebe also had toward her end years.

View attachment 1427193View attachment 1427194

New is great but with a house like chanel it should look chanel 50-80% of the look if not what's the point , clients can break it down but here it's broken down already so much that 27k for an abstract flower unflattering tent top is a stretch to far in the wrong direction.

Wrong idea new or old is a wrong idea...he does not have the discipline nor strong clear vision to even play with wrong ideas and make them right or interesting.

I don't care what anybody likes in that respect when i shop that's not unique feeling most of have any ways, but we are talking here about brands from a top level down experience , spirit of a house , branding, creativity of creative director, business strategy, client service,art direction , quality of product quality of ideas, sentiment on the fashion world , etc etc

Clients not liking is about feedback of their base, its another indicator when we speak about brands taste or values etc.(not about personal validation of their existence )

Like i find Pierre Hardy own brand extremely tacky design department store merch from the 00´s, Louboutin is just as tacky as well but in a loud sex shop infused design merch perspective, Pierre Hard at Hermes does in context of hermes high jewelry amazing stuff and even like the beauty design, at balenciaga he did amazing concept for shoes. t
For me that's the nuances when i talk about designers and clients feedback or vision or any other details, not in a B&W way.


*(Woke Chanel)
Is a new phenomenon i notice that when design has primarily phoebe philo abstraction of conventional shapes or ideas of good taste rich and intelligent dressing it's more emancipated/free women then say a MGC or VV design that caters to a more widely classic standings of women's fashion that is pretty or beautiful therefore seen as old fashioned and backwards..... not liberated mind.
My problem with logo has less to do with logos themselves than the aesthetic used to sell them.
From the moment I started to buy Chanel RTW to the moment I stopped, there were logos. The Chanel I know has always been very logo-fied, done with more or less success, sometimes with a lot of humor.

I have said it many times here but unlike a lot of Chanel fans, I despise the SS1995 collection. It’s a fun show to watch but my favorite outfit is probably the look Victoire de Castellane wore closing the show: a Chanel bar suit in tweed with wide leg pants lol.

But for a lot of Chanel fans, that collection, that aesthetic is the kind of epitome of what they likes or would like to recapture from Chanel. And in some ways, Virginie tapped into that.

Virginie was capable of that:
Modern and timeless, rather chic

IMG_6616.jpeg

But she was also capable of that, which in return was a lot more commercially successful:
IMG_6619.jpeg

I think there are more interesting ways to do logos au demeurant…

The reality is that, this is Chanel. You can’t remove logos. There are everywhere. I have a lot of blouses with seasonal prints and there’s a CC in them in between the prints. You can also elevate the exercise.

But I agree with the idea of frumpiness. I almost think that it’s something that goes with Chanel whenever volumes and the lineance to the very bourgeois (and conservative) side of Chanel are involved.

There were moments when Chanel was truly modern. When it was sexy and young. Karl did that perfectly in moments during the 80’s,90’s,00’s and 2010’s and there were moments where no matter how new he tried to be, the clothes looked like they were coming straight from Bernadette Chirac’s wardrobe.
I love the Tour Eiffel in the Grand Palais couture collection. But that collection would only work on someone with heavy modifications and great style.

The frumpiness with Blazy was more with the length of the skirt. It’s very Coco. That length only works with sexy shoes. And the classic Chanel slingbacks aren’t sexy.

Maybe that’s what is needed back. A kind of tacky sexiness to balance the whole thing. Blazy’s collection would look even more good with some tacky sex Christian Louboutin heels. The So Kate are too obvious..So the Cassia would do the job well lol.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,284
Messages
15,294,748
Members
89,220
Latest member
OutOfFashion
Back
Top