this was a story in my local paper about how the site crashed. of course the tech companies dont want to reveal how or why it crashed because it could affect their tech stock. the story also doesnt touch on how people are annoyed because of the re-sellers who were allowed to buy out the entire stock themselves. which i think is a bigger annoyance than the website crashing. 
Target feeling social media sting more than a week after website crash
 				    			 			 				 					
 				  				 					By Michael B. Farrell, Globe Staff (boston.com)
 					More than a week after Target Corp.’s website crashed  under the weight of shoppers eager to buy inexpensive products by  designer Missoni,  social media storm clouds still hover over the  Minneapolis-based retailer.
 Frustrated consumers are using Facebook, Twitter, and popular fashion  blogs such as Racked.com to complain about lost or delayed orders, and  cancelled sales. Some are even calling for an outright boycott.  On one  Facebook page, the Sept. 13 fiasco is dubbed the “BP oil spill of  fashion.” 
 Shoppers nationwide were attracted by clothing and other items --  including towels and bicycles -- that were part of a much-hyped  400-piece Target collection that features the Italian fashion house’s  signature zig-zag patterns. But the website, 
www.target.com, was  overwhelmed for much of the day by a glut of traffic, leaving many  people unable to complete orders or even get on the site.  As of  yesterday, most Missoni products online still appeared to be out of  stock, but Target is not saying how many orders were delayed or  cancelled because of the crash.
 Big Internet retailers have had their share of  gaffes, but the  Missoni mess could be a transformative moment in the relatively brief  history of e-commerce.  Retail analysts say it shows that  even though  online shopping has made major strides since Victoria Secret’s website  famously faltered during a 1999 webcast,  companies still may not always  have the technological muscle to meet consumer demand for such frenzied  promotions.
 “The lessons here are to plan and forecast these events very  carefully, and not go for the big bang,” Brian Walker, an analyst at  Forrester Research in Cambridge, said in an e-mail . “The big bang may  be great to generate marketing hype and buzz, but can be a nightmare in  serving customers, both online and offline.”
 Up until the launch, Target’s marketing campaign for the Missoni line  was a hugely successful example of how to build a relationship between a  discount retailer and high-end design, according to Danica Lo, national  editor for Racked.com.  “Obviously, they did an amazing job,” Lo said.
 Target built the buzz by releasing glimpses of the Missoni collection  on Facebook and YouTube, it even concocted a doll blogger, with its own  Tumblr page and Twitter account. 
 But trouble started soon after the wares went on sale. 
 Target’s new website, designed on an IBM platform and hosted by  AT&T, buckled under “unprecedented demand,” the company said in a  statement this week. “This demand impacted our Target.com site and  affected the shipment and delivery of select guest orders.”
 It’s still unclear exactly  what went wrong. Three Massachusetts  companies that worked with Target on its website — Endeca Technologies  Inc., SapientNitro, and Akamai Technologies — would not comment on the  failure. Target would not elaborate beyond its statement.
 Regardless of why the site couldn’t cope under the strain of high  demand, some jilted customers appear less than understanding. And a  campaign built around social media, is now feeling social media’s wrath.
 “Wow Target, you really failed. Not only is your execution poor, but  it just keeps getting worse. I’ve received 3 partial shipments of my  orders, and all were equally screwed up,” said one customer on the  Target Style Facebook page. 
 Another wrote:  “Maybe my order is still processing ... maybe it’s  cancelled ... maybe it’s “lost” ... Only sure thing is that this is the  worst shopping experience I’ve had so far!”
 Racked.com published an e-mail from a customer who said their credit  card was charged even though Target apparently lost their order. “In one  week, I’ve now spent the equivalent of an entire workday on the phone  with Target,” they wrote.
 
Target has been trying to make amends by reaching out to unsatisfied  shoppers. In one response on its Facebook page, a company representative  wrote:  “Thank you for sharing your experience with us. Our apologies.  Please do keep us updated!”
 Walker does not expect Target to suffer any long-term damage as a  result of the misfire.  
“The impact is really in lost opportunity for  sales and marketing, not only online but across the entire chain,” he  said. “In many ways, this was a huge success as a marketing event, but a  terrible execution of merchandise planning and demand forecasting. The  empty shelves at Target stores and this downtime with the site are both  evidence of that.”
 But at least one analyst believes the online chatter over the website  collapse could ultimately be as good for Target as its campaign  promoting Missoni.
 “This isn’t so horrible,” said Mike Tesler, president of the Norwell consulting firm Retail Concepts. 
 Tesler said he is betting that as soon as fashion-driven shoppers see  something that catches their eye at Target, they’ll rush back to buy,  in stores or online.
  “In spite of what the geeks and techies are saying” about the website  problems, Tesler said,  “I think it’s a good thing for Target.”