I think it would have been better if
Max compared two Versace shows and not old Versace with new BP, 'cause in that case, it doesn't matter how old or recent the shows are, both houses represent two very different types of women and men... since you are talking mainly about the sexy aspect, maybe a
solo Versace comparison would have been more accurate.
Now, I agree with the some of the last posts above, model casting have definitely changed A LOT in many ways, but talking only about the superficial aesthetics... I thought there was some kind of predominant pattern physically speaking, but as insecure as I felt posting my previous post in this thread, I have to admit I was wrong. I think I have to agree with
Heather; now that fashion week is over... if you take a detailed look to all the shows separately, the situation seems to be just like she described it: "seems anything goes nowadays"...
There's still a big lack of racial diveristy in general, but ironically, there's a lot of aesthetic diversity, meaning there's not a
predominant or established physical pattern that defines an aesthetic era. They way it's explained at the beggining of this thread is very clear:
80s-90s: The All-American perfect looking girl
90s: the individual look (the supermodel)
late 90s: the waif heroin chic
late 90s: Brazilian takeover
early 200s: androgynous girls
early 2000s: Tom Ford era (overly sexy)
mids 2000s: Eastern European wave
2004: The baby doll and alien girls
2007-2009: the clone wars
2009: the socialite model
2010: the Lara Stone remakes
2010-present: the sexy girls and plus size, rise of the asian models
Even though I think some of the titles
Trevor chose for the years are kind of generalized, I do see what he meant with most of them, 'cause most of the trends he mentioned actually happened in an obvious and global way: print and runway all over the main capitals.
This very same moment I don't feel like anything like it is happening. There's not a predominant trend making a momentum, not physically, not nationally, not in any sense... maybe there are some minus inclinations in some cities, but there's anything obvious or global happening. I wonder if the reason for this is maybe that trends in modelling are having a
transitional phase, so to speak, the same way around 05 and 06 there wasn't any preponderant look in the industry until in 07 we started seeing the teenage Dutch domination that reigned over a few seasons until all the Lara clones started to prevail. That's why I'm gonna quote
Heather one more time
" we're trying to look at it in a yearly/current way instead of a decades based approach"... I think we should wait some more time to see if a notorious and
defined model trend happens again.