Nicolas Ghesquière - Designer, Creative Director of Louis Vuitton

I don’t think he is because based on his talks with the ambassadors, he (and his team) seems to be really interested in challenging the perception of Redcarpet dressing…

It seems all the designers who are considered “de rigeur” need to have that „challenging the preception of…“ factor, otherwise I can‘t fathom the reason behind the ongoing success of Miuccia Prada, JW Anderson and yes, red carpet dressing as in most of these custom looks from Vuitton that appeared on the red carpets most recently.

All of that makes it feel like a relic of a bygone era when designers like Helmut Lang or Tom Ford insisted that most people dress first and foremost to look the best version of themselves.

When I look at how 'cool girls' like the Traina sisters, Jennifer Connelly, Joana Preiss or Chloe Sevigny looked wearing some of Nicolas' most memorable collections from the past, I think it‘s undeniable those looks were at once ambitiously designed, effortless and undeniably cool.

These dresses really aren‘t that, I‘m afraid.
 
The runways clothes look so much better now on celebrities/influencers than they did a couple of years back.
Nicolas just need to move on from the ankle boot and anything oversize. :judge:
 
The runways clothes look so much better now on celebrities/influencers than they did a couple of years back.
Nicolas just need to move on from the ankle boot and anything oversize. :judge:


Some of these looks really fall into the „very unflattering / rather contrived“ category to me - Particularly the long grey 80ies jacket with matching hat and ankle boots look. Yikes.
 
It seems all the designers who are considered “de rigeur” need to have that „challenging the preception of…“ factor, otherwise I can‘t fathom the reason behind the ongoing success of Miuccia Prada, JW Anderson and yes, red carpet dressing as in most of these custom looks from Vuitton that appeared on the red carpets most recently.

All of that makes it feel like a relic of a bygone era when designers like Helmut Lang or Tom Ford insisted that most people dress first and foremost to look the best version of themselves.

When I look at how 'cool girls' like the Traina sisters, Jennifer Connelly, Joana Preiss or Chloe Sevigny looked wearing some of Nicolas' most memorable collections from the past, I think it‘s undeniable those looks were at once ambitiously designed, effortless and undeniably cool.

These dresses really aren‘t that, I‘m afraid.
I agree 100% but I think the business of fashion has changed a lot of those things.

In the past, the business was very much different. Stylist were in fact glorified personal shoppers for the most part as very few had access to the facilities provided by houses and so, they bought outfits and composed looks. Designers had personal relationships with celebrities, who in general connected with their work in a organic way (buying or when they were really into fashion, contacted the PR team of the house for some clothes).

Things have really changed in the past 8/7 years. It’s a fashion game in a way.
Today Celebrities are all chasing contracts. Their stylists too wants the connections to those brands.
So it’s less about « I’m going to look my best or my most comfortable on the Redcarpet » but, « I’m going to standout and appear and market myself as a fashion icon because it will raise my status ».
So indeed, when the studio design a dress like the red dress, the stylist is more than welcomed to challenge their client. And of course, Nicolas will be flattered in the idea that someone would choose such a daring look for a ceremony.

But I think Nicolas has always been about that idea of challenging Redcarpet looks. I hated his first Oscars dress he did for Jennifer Connelly in 2001 but I saw a video when he talked about it. The good thing is that he made clothes for women who had a connection to his clothes: Jennifer Connelly, Nicole Kidman, Charlotte Gainsbourg…etc.
And then there were the Vanessa Traina and others who were customers.

Today ok, he still has his devotee who wears his clothes on their daily life (and they generally looks the best in his clothes, even someone like Catherine Deneuve) but in the sea of paid Ambassadors, chasing contracts celebrities and others, it’s difficult to see through things.

I think today for all of the brands, the word is confusion.
At with Nicolas, I feel like people just try to wear the runway look HtoT just to fit.

Me personally, I love the way Lous and the Yakuza and my all time favorite Brune de Buonomamo wears Nicolas clothes. One is an ambassador and the other is one of his friend (and the sister of his longtime assistant). They wears it because it’s their style. But it’s not a Redcarpet situation.

And I have to say that I have the same issue with every house. The increase of ambassadors has killed personal style. And now, you have clients who are trying to compete with celebrities too…But that’s another topic.
 


I am sure that one day we will look back and thank God for Louis Vuitton and Ghesquière for having invented the perfect outfit to shoplift an Ikea store… But today is not that day and this is the most horrendous thing I have ever seen.

It’s like a de dragged version of this dress + a dusty Pierre Cardin design

IMG_2367.webp
draglicious
 
I agree 100% but I think the business of fashion has changed a lot of those things.

In the past, the business was very much different. Stylist were in fact glorified personal shoppers for the most part as very few had access to the facilities provided by houses and so, they bought outfits and composed looks. Designers had personal relationships with celebrities, who in general connected with their work in a organic way (buying or when they were really into fashion, contacted the PR team of the house for some clothes).

Things have really changed in the past 8/7 years. It’s a fashion game in a way.
Today Celebrities are all chasing contracts. Their stylists too wants the connections to those brands.
So it’s less about « I’m going to look my best or my most comfortable on the Redcarpet » but, « I’m going to standout and appear and market myself as a fashion icon because it will raise my status ».
So indeed, when the studio design a dress like the red dress, the stylist is more than welcomed to challenge their client. And of course, Nicolas will be flattered in the idea that someone would choose such a daring look for a ceremony.

But I think Nicolas has always been about that idea of challenging Redcarpet looks. I hated his first Oscars dress he did for Jennifer Connelly in 2001 but I saw a video when he talked about it. The good thing is that he made clothes for women who had a connection to his clothes: Jennifer Connelly, Nicole Kidman, Charlotte Gainsbourg…etc.
And then there were the Vanessa Traina and others who were customers.

Today ok, he still has his devotee who wears his clothes on their daily life (and they generally looks the best in his clothes, even someone like Catherine Deneuve) but in the sea of paid Ambassadors, chasing contracts celebrities and others, it’s difficult to see through things.

I think today for all of the brands, the word is confusion.
At with Nicolas, I feel like people just try to wear the runway look HtoT just to fit.

Me personally, I love the way Lous and the Yakuza and my all time favorite Brune de Buonomamo wears Nicolas clothes. One is an ambassador and the other is one of his friend (and the sister of his longtime assistant). They wears it because it’s their style. But it’s not a Redcarpet situation.

And I have to say that I have the same issue with every house. The increase of ambassadors has killed personal style. And now, you have clients who are trying to compete with celebrities too…But that’s another topic.

Don‘t you think it‘s still possible to stand out with something that is both ambitioned *and* making the wearer look great? What service does it do to the brand if the looks you see in the public don‘t make the wearer look great? I dunno, that red lantern monstrosity looks like the worst marriage of trying to do conservative red carpet with s silly lantern… *thing* below the waist that nobody aspires to.

It’s not like Nicolas doesn‘t have a good statement evening piece per each collection. A Lesage or Ollier beaded jacket with a neat trouser would have fitted much more the esprit we associate with him.
 
Don‘t you think it‘s still possible to stand out with something that is both ambitioned *and* making the wearer look great? What service does it do to the brand if the looks you see in the public don‘t make the wearer look great? I dunno, that red lantern monstrosity looks like the worst marriage of trying to do conservative red carpet with s silly lantern… *thing* below the waist that nobody aspires to.

It’s not like Nicolas doesn‘t have a good statement evening piece per each collection. A Lesage or Ollier beaded jacket with a neat trouser would have fitted much more the esprit we associate with him.
I think it’s totally possible but then it’s almost like two different exercises because for me, Redcarpet fashion is totally detached from « fashion ».
So I don’t know what I should expect from that. They have dedicated teams for those special projects at every houses. And sometimes, the looks aren’t really connected to what was shown on the runway but are kind of in-line with the vision of the designer.

Am I supposed to base my appreciation for his work on customs looks made by the team inspired by his work in collaboration with the stylist?

It’s the same for people wearing Head to toe, styled like what MAS did for the show but replicated by their celebrity stylists and credited to their celebrity stylists.

If you want to make someone looks good, you mix and match. The purpose of the runway look isn’t always to send a good look.

And btw, I don’t find the the lantern dress horrible. I think it’s an unfortunately length.
It could have been less extreme in volumes too but I’m not sure the effect would have been the same.
The actress is pulling that off with a great aplomb.
 


I am sure that one day we will look back and thank God for Louis Vuitton and Ghesquière for having invented the perfect outfit to shoplift an Ikea store… But today is not that day and this is the most horrendous thing I have ever seen.


After the red carpet, you can put a spotlight inside and you have a nice lamp for the reception of a sex shop. The new Chalayan of fashion.
 
not feeling great about Nic’s future. Being reminded he may think beauty is fascist could be why he refuses to make pretty dresses.

Its looking like he isn’t gonna make the cut and will stay in that 2010s energy that we are currently exiting all over the world.
 
I often think that Balenciaga mid 2000's collections were not designed by Ghesquiere but by some ghost designer, cause there is no way the designer behind the stellar collections of SS06, FW07 and FW08 (just to name few) is the same who's been milking the same 80's scifi extravaganza at Louis Vuitton for almost a decade now.
Most designers are actually pretty consistent throughout their careers in terms of proposition and point of view:
- Hedi got his skinny twinks and MDMA rock&roll groupies
- Tom Ford got his glamazon sexy femme fatale
- Karl got his flamboyant at Fendi and classics with a twist at CHANEL
- Armani is the classiest of classy
...yet Nicholas is the only one whom you can clearly see the design switch from Kering house to LVMH
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
213,320
Messages
15,217,398
Members
87,239
Latest member
Adrielly
Back
Top