tricotineacetat
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2005
- Messages
- 2,972
- Reaction score
- 3,210
I get the disappointment part lol.
I don’t know, maybe I don’t see the big deal about it because I interned in fashion when I was very young so I understood quite early that the creative process wasn’t linear. That it wasn’t only of waking up and drawing. There are looks that were literally copies of a movie on the runway. But it made sense in terms of context and for the house.
That being said, I had somewhat of the same when I discovered that Azzedine’s repertoire was in fact based on costumes from movies. He talked about Arlettie a lot but when I saw her movies and realized that his whole signature was based on that, I was stunted. Then when discovering Adrian, it became even more obvious.
But it eventually allowed me to expand my culture. And the copies are never « gratuites ». Because between the copies, there are original ideas and also innovations.
And I must admit that sometimes I enjoy some copies. When Nicolas is copying Gianni for example. Or when he copies Gaultier for obvious reasons.
All the designers and even our favorites copies but I think I our judgement comes from how and who do they copy.
On that I though it was maybe a bit unfair for Mugler to call out Rousteing years ago. Olivier is a fan. Ok, he could have been more subtle about it but Balenciaga and Dior could have called out Mugler for copying them…Even though beyond his copies, he also had original ideas.
If we follow that thought, wouldn’t it then be fair to be a bit less hard on a designer like Hedi Slimane when other designers are doing a similar job by putting images of pop cultural icons such as Francoise Hardy, Jane Birkin or Edie Sedgewick on their moodboards?
Even a designer like Helmut Lang has to a large degree issued designs that were largely copies of utilitarian garments from workwear or the military, yet I don’t see it’s lessened his esteem in fashion history, quite the opposite, in fact.