Paper Winter 2014 : Kim Kardashian by Jean-Paul Goude | Page 3 | the Fashion Spot
  • MODERATOR'S NOTE: Please can all of theFashionSpot's forum members remind themselves of the Forum Rules. Thank you.

Paper Winter 2014 : Kim Kardashian by Jean-Paul Goude

Thanks for bringing that up Les Sucettes. I've been thinking of it ever since Kimair linked Goude's work this morning on an earlier post, 'Hottentot Venus' I mean. There's this image of Baartman with a little child perched on her buttocks, and here we have Kim with the champagne glass, it's all too similar and leaves a bitter aftertaste for me. So no, sorry, I cannot possibly fawn over Goude's 'brilliance' or appluad Kim's 'business savvy'.

Exactly.:flower: That's exactly Baartman's image that came to my mind. It does leave a bitter aftertaste, particularly because Saartjie story is such a desperately sad tale that if the idea was to make this a bit of joke, and show how Kim is such a good sport, it just means we haven't learned s***.
 
the original is more appalling than these covers. Though I don't understand the point in replicating something so obscene.

EXACTLY! I'm not saying that these covers are good, but what's more upsetting is that the original image is being reproduced. Goude's work for me is at best questionable and at worst, racist. Why recreate an "iconic" image that portrayed a black woman as an object? It's just silly. And it doesn't make it less offensive that the updated version features a woman who isn't black.

Kim can do what she wants, whether or not she's a mother--women don't suddenly give up their sexuality after giving birth. But she and Kanye are just annoying. As much of an attention-seeker she is, you know Kanye was probably backstage at this shoot saying something to the effect of, "this is art, babe. those uncultured haters out there won't get it, but I'm an artist and I know art." :rolleyes:
 
Goude literally loves black women, and I really don't see the issue here ...
I think you may lack informations about the guy (he was born in France in the 1940s ... when we still had colonies all over the place...).

For instance, what he has done for the 200th anniversary of the French Revolution was the exact opposite of what you might accuse him of transposing in his images...
Just have a look at it, at what he says. He basically wanted everybody (every French citizen...) to forget about their ethnicity, their country of origin and join in a one big happy party to celebrate France and its Republic, its Human Rights Revolution etc. (and leaving in the past racism, colonies etc. - not forgetting them, just going forward) ...

~ but I have to admit that I was a bit ill-at-ease sometimes in the exhibition ... Because it sometimes feel like he loves a certain image/cliche of black women, and sometimes it can be seen as "racist" ... I totally get it !

But he has changed since the eighties, and what he's doing with Kim... I don't know I feel like it's a parody.
When he put Grace Jones on the map (at least for the mass public in France) that was because 1/ he loved her so much 2/ Frenchies didn't seem to understand what that woman was, and were making fun of her (well that's the legend ...) ... He was one of the first to put in front of the scene north-african and black women ... In France, at this time it was HUGE !
 
the brown is horrible and everything about the rest screams tacky and thirsty. thank you but no
 
the black model isn't her. And the hotdog image is nauseating.
 
Goude literally loves black women, and I really don't see the issue here ...
I think you may lack informations about the guy (he was born in France in the 1940s ... when we still had colonies all over the place...).

For instance, what he has done for the 200th anniversary of the French Revolution was the exact opposite of what you might accuse him of transposing in his images...
Just have a look at it, at what he says. He basically wanted everybody (every French citizen...) to forget about their ethnicity, their country of origin and join in a one big happy party to celebrate France and its Republic, its Human Rights Revolution etc. (and leaving in the past racism, colonies etc. - not forgetting them, just going forward) ...

~ but I have to admit that I was a bit ill-at-ease sometimes in the exhibition ... Because it sometimes feel like he loves a certain image/cliche of black women, and sometimes it can be seen as "racist" ... I totally get it !

But he has changed since the eighties, and what he's doing with Kim... I don't know I feel like it's a parody.
When he put Grace Jones on the map (at least for the mass public in France) that was because 1/ he loved her so much 2/ Frenchies didn't seem to understand what that woman was, and were making fun of her (well that's the legend ...) ... He was one of the first to put in front of the scene north-african and black women ... In France, at this time it was HUGE !


i think its different when you've taken classes, have access to the internet and and books to do reseach, or were raised by a family who has informed you of how exactly black women were portrayed by the Europeans when they first came over. Sarah Baartman being a prime example. Yes, Goude did "love" the black figure, but he did nothing to it but fetishize it and almost mock it just like how they did with Baartman when she first came over. The original photo resembles the figure of her, and whether or not Goude/Kim Kardashian and team have seen it, i cant help but find a correlation between the 2.

La_Belle_Hottentot.jpg

wikimedia.org


i never looked at his images of his black subjects and thought of it as empowering or artistic, i just thought of it as racism passed as art, but thats just me...
 
TREVOFASHIONISTO, thank you! I was going to type a similar response. I too have probably taken way too many courses dealing with race relations and just been raised to be more "aware", but I totally agree that it's just racism being perpetuated under the umbrella of art. Perhaps not specifically in the photo of Kim, but definitely in the original work.

I'd also like to point out that in the 30s, there was the Colonial Exhibition in Paris (google it), which featured a human zoo portion. They shipped in "strange-looking" people (not unlike Sarah Baartman) from various French colonies so they could be ogled. During this time, the intentions were not necessarily negative. Indeed, many of the people during this time were simply fascinated by such individuals. But that doesn't change the fact that they were brought over like animals to be exploited for the viewing pleasure of Europeans. The same thing applies to Goude's work. No matter how much he "literally loves" black women, the execution itself has very heavy racial implications. He might not have meant it in that way. But you have to be careful how to portray or "use" any person of color in art--especially black women.

It may seem silly, as this is just a magazine cover meant as a parody, but there are many many people who will have similar thoughts to mine running through their heads when they see this image.
 
Have you guys seen the whole spreed? She is complete nude! :ninja: you can see her everything
 
Does it even matter? We can talk about the Kardashians infiltrating fashion but what's so inspiring about fashion now anyways. The same dresses, the same editorials
Look at TFS, the threads during fashion week and for monthly magazines are so sparse compared to years before.
Look at the stylists, photographers,etc, they don't want to be celebrated, they want to be celebrities. And who better than the Kardashians to give that to you
 
Product Details
$10 for issues + $4 handling fee
Limited to 4 issues per household
Ships December 1st

All sales are final, no refunds

This issue is a COLLECTORS ITEM!
Our 2014 Art Issue is an art project in and of itself, in which we explore, deconstruct and obsess over the theme of attention: BREAK THE INTERNET.

Pairing Kim Kardashian with the legendary photographer Jean-Paul Goude was the kickoff. Like it or not, Kardashian is a Hyper-Pop-Culture-Icon-Institution. She understands fame and popularity as if it were coded in her DNA. Goude popped the cork on what makes her an icon: it is not just her ***, but her willingness to give us 100 percent.

EVEN MORE INSIDE THIS CRAZY BREAK THE INTERNET ISSUE:

James Franco hosts #MakeJamesDo, a Google+ Hangout in which he does anything his fans tell him. 0_0. Inside the issue he's created a hunky 32-page selfie calendar. 365 of James, James, James.
The Fat Jew launches his campaign for President of the Internet.
Tim and Eric dress up in the most amazing drag.
Snoop Dogg talks to us about his new career as a painter.
Aubrey Plaza makes prank calls.
Cameron Dallas models like a total stud.
Just about every blogger, Tweeter, YouTuber and Insta-pet create and collaborat with us.
So here it is. If you like it, share it, tweet about it, take a picture of it, tag it (#BreakTheInternet). If you don’t like it, post that too. It will only make us more famous.

Source: papermag.com
 
If you know nothing else about Kim Kardashian, you know that she is very, very famous. Some would say that's all you need to know. At press time, she has 25 million Twitter followers, about a million less than Oprah Winfrey and nearly 5 million more than CNN Breaking News. Her Instagram account, where she is a prolific purveyor of selfies, is the site's third most popular. You can't walk through a supermarket without glimpsing her on a multitude of tabloids whose headlines holler about her relationships, her parenting style and the vicissitudes of her ample curves. But she has also graced the covers of highbrow fashion bibles like W and Vogue; with her now-husband, Kanye West, she appeared on the latter above the hashtag #worldsmosttalkedaboutcouple, creating a furor that made it perhaps the #worldsmostcontroversialcover.

Her millions-strong popularity and inescapable media presence have made her grist for think pieces galore. She is variously seen as a feminist-entrepreneur-pop-culture-icon or a late-stage symptom of our society's myriad ills: narcissism, opportunism, unbridled ambition, unchecked capitalism. But behind all the hoopla, there is an actual woman -- a physical body where the forces of fame and wealth converge. Who isn't at least a tad curious about the flesh that carries the myth?

Unlike most people, she looks exactly the same in person as she does in photographs or on television, with one exception: she is smaller than she appears in images, with tiny, almost doll-like ears and feet and hands. Everything else about her seems amplified, tumescent. Her black hair is thicker than any you have ever seen, her lips fuller, her giant Bambi-eyes larger, their whites whiter, and the lashes that frame them longer. If some of this is the result of artificial enhancement -- does anyone else have eyelashes that resemble miniature feather dusters? -- none of it seems obviously ersatz. But that's not to say it looks real, either. She is like a beautiful anime character come to life.

kkmiddle(rgb)watermark.jpgAs soon as she arrives at the hostess podium of the Polo Lounge in Beverly Hills, where we meet for our interview, a young fan who appears to be in her late teens or early twenties accosts her. The fan has been running to catch (keep up with?) Kardashian; she brings with her a breeze. "Will you take a selfie with me, Kim?" she pants. (This is what fans asks the High Priestess of Instagram -- autographs are so last century.) She obliges, leaning in for the picture and striding away almost before I can blink. "She's gonna post it," Kardashian says wryly. "I bet it's posted right now." Later, she will tell me that she's "not really a filter person," and that she doesn't generally use them when she publishes her many selfies. As she talks, I notice that her skin, which is the golden color of whiskey, is free of wrinkles, crow's feet, laugh lines, blemishes, freckles, moles, under-eye circles, scars, errant eyebrow hairs or human flaws of any kind. It's like she comes with a built-in filter of her own.

With its enveloping green leather booths and twinkling white garden lights, the Polo Lounge is a setting that lends itself to intimacy. Kardashian, who is wearing a monochromatic champagne-colored ensemble (Margiela bodysuit, Chloé silk pants, Lanvin silk coat), gives off a cozy vibe herself. She leans forward while she talks, resting her cheek in the palm of her hand as though she's chatting with her closest girlfriend. She tells me that the Kardashian clan is currently a week into filming season 10 of Keeping Up With the Kardashians, which she has called "the best family movie ever," never mind the rampant speculation, in early 2013, that season 9 would be her last. I'm surprised to hear that they still enjoy the process, since your typical American family would no longer be on speaking terms. "We're kind of obsessed with each other," she explains.

Today, a day off, she spent at a pumpkin patch with West, whom she repeatedly calls Kanye -- she clearly enjoys saying his name -- and their 16-month old daughter, North. They arrived at the farm unbothered by photographers, a rarity in the circus that is her life ("literally every single day there's about ten cars of paparazzi literally waiting outside our homes"). It wasn't long, however, before the paparazzi had surrounded them. "I couldn't really pick out our pumpkins, and [North] couldn't really enjoy it," she says. After a moment, perhaps concerned that she has come perilously close to complaining about her fame, she adds matter-of-factly: "You just have to not care. You just have to say, 'This is our life, and it is what it is.'" Her delivery is Zen-like, almost affectless, as it is on the show. "All my friends tell me the world could be coming to an end, and I'm always so calm," she says, opening a packet of Equal. She empties its contents into a glass of passion fruit iced tea, then fastidiously bites granules of sweetener off her manicured nails.

***

kkcover2(rgb)watermark.jpgThe rap on Kim Kardashian is that she has done nothing to merit her fame. But the longer I steep myself in the ambience of her pleasantly languid manner and hologram-perfect looks, the more facile this charge begins to seem. Of course, she has cannily leveraged that fame to build, with her sisters, a beauty-industrial complex, which includes a clothing line, a makeup line, a line of tanning products and seven perfumes. (A collection of hair care implements and styling products will debut in the spring.) Her mobile app, Kim Kardashian: Hollywood, in which players climb their way to A-List status under Kardashian's tutelage, has earned over $43 million since its debut in June.

Yet her perceived lack of accomplishment is also, perhaps, an accomplishment in itself. Kardashian seems to know instinctively that, as Andy Warhol once observed, "When you just see somebody on the street, they can really have an aura. But then when they open their mouth, there goes the aura." Take the stream of small faux-confidences that she offers during the interview. They reveal very little yet foster a sense of closeness. She tells me that she is "obsessed with apps" but, when I ask her to name one, she replies, "I like all different apps." Of her 72-day marriage to Kris Humphries, one of her rare missteps that actually left a footprint, she says: "It's just one of those life lessons that you have to learn, and it's OK." Her behavior suggests that the key to total ubiquity is giving up all of one's verbal edges and sharp angles (while occasionally tossing out a memorable visual flare: a sex tape, say, or a nude photo shoot).

Social media has created a new kind of fame, and Kardashian is its paragon. It is a fame whose hallmark is agreeable omnipresence, which resembles a kind of evenly spread absence, soothing, tranquil and unobjectionable. There's an argument to be made that Kardashian has been recorded and viewed more often than any other personage in history, and while she has certainly had her awkward moments (posting a vampire facial on Instagram, announcing that she wanted to buy a stroller that complemented her unborn baby's skin color), she has also never made a truly ruinous gaffe, been caught in a Britney Spears-style public meltdown or sallied forth looking less than photogenic. As she puts it, "There's nothing we can do that's not documented, so why not look your best, and amazing?"

To mere mortals who occasionally visit the grocery store in yoga pants, her willpower and self-discipline are a marvel. Imagine being filmed and photographed constantly, yet never saying anything seriously controversial or appearing unkempt. The effort involved seems torturous, impossible. And yet, though her life requires work of a sort -- roughly two hours of hair and makeup each day, regular meetings for her assorted businesses, wardrobe fittings, photo shoots, 5:00 a.m. workouts -- you don't get the sense that she is hiding or suppressing her true, private self. "I think you've seen every side of me on my show," she says, popping a piece of pound cake into her mouth.

We're accustomed to our performers having onstage and backstage registers, but for her there is no division between the two. This is, indeed, the definition of a reality star. She's not performing, that is -- at least not visibly. She is being, and being is her act. Her appeal derives from her uncanny consistency, as does that of her show. It's relaxing to watch the sisters sprawl on each other's beds and talk about nothing, to see them discuss constipation cures or their preferred way to eat Nilla Wafers. Like Warhol's screen tests, Keeping Up With the Kardashians has a disarming purity. It invites us to glory in its stars' mundanity, which permits us to enjoy our own.

***

KKface(rgb)watermark.jpg"My makeup artist said to me the other day, 'You haven't taken a selfie in a while,'" Kardashian says, as the afternoon slides into evening and the light turns magic-hour blue. To remedy this, she posted one of herself in full makeup and a white terrycloth robe, with the literal caption, "It's been a while since I've taken a selfie." It garnered more than a half-a-million likes. Selfies have been on her mind lately. She is putting together a collection of her oeuvre, called Selfish, to be published by Rizzoli in the spring. She has spent hours sifting through her vast, meticulously organized digital archive. "The book company edited them, and I was like, 'Wait a minute! There are like 300 here that you're not adding!'" she says. I remark that I am surprised she can remember and differentiate among a bunch of near-identical photos of her face. She can, she says; she is organizing them chronologically, dating them by what she wore to specific events. "I know what I wore, what accessories I wore, where I was, who I was with," she tells me. "I remember everything." Her mind, it seems, traps the minutiae most of us forget. For her, though, it's not minutiae; it's her life, and her life is her career.

I ask her whether Kim Kardashian would exist without social media. "I don't think so..." she says, slowly, then reconsiders. "I don't think social media was that heavy when we started our show, but I think we really evolved with social media." The next day, as I scroll through Instagram, I come across a photograph of her, taken the night of our interview, wearing the champagne getup at a restaurant in Venice. I also find two photos of North toddling around the pumpkin patch in a tiny fringed cape and Baby Vans. One of these pictures has more than a million likes. "I love sharing my world with people," Kardashian tells me, and I detect no hint of falseness. "That's just who I am." No more, no less.

Hair by Laurent Philippon at Calliste Agency
Makeup by Mario Dedivanovic
Manicure by Tatiana Sery at Aurelien Agency
Photographer assistants: Philippe Baumann, Franck Joyeux and Nicolas Premoli
Digital imaging: Helene Chauvet for Kilato
Digital: Christian Horvath For D-Factory
Producer: Virginie Laguens
Assistant producer: Grace Salemme

Source: papermag.com
 
Product Details
$10 for issues + $4 handling fee
Limited to 4 issues per household
Ships December 1st

All sales are final, no refunds

This issue is a COLLECTORS ITEM!
Our 2014 Art Issue is an art project in and of itself, in which we explore, deconstruct and obsess over the theme of attention: BREAK THE INTERNET.

Pairing Kim Kardashian with the legendary photographer Jean-Paul Goude was the kickoff. Like it or not, Kardashian is a Hyper-Pop-Culture-Icon-Institution. She understands fame and popularity as if it were coded in her DNA. Goude popped the cork on what makes her an icon: it is not just her ***, but her willingness to give us 100 percent.

EVEN MORE INSIDE THIS CRAZY BREAK THE INTERNET ISSUE:

James Franco hosts #MakeJamesDo, a Google+ Hangout in which he does anything his fans tell him. 0_0. Inside the issue he's created a hunky 32-page selfie calendar. 365 of James, James, James.
The Fat Jew launches his campaign for President of the Internet.
Tim and Eric dress up in the most amazing drag.
Snoop Dogg talks to us about his new career as a painter.
Aubrey Plaza makes prank calls.
Cameron Dallas models like a total stud.
Just about every blogger, Tweeter, YouTuber and Insta-pet create and collaborat with us.
So here it is. If you like it, share it, tweet about it, take a picture of it, tag it (#BreakTheInternet). If you don’t like it, post that too. It will only make us more famous.

Source: papermag.com

This review is making me nauseous. A round-up of the most insufferable people in pop culture at the moment!
I thought the cover was the worst, but I mean , The Fat Jew, really?? No thanks!!

"All sales are final, no refunds"

Hahaha, why, of course. I can only image the amount of people who will demand a refund after wasting a their money on this tosh.
 
Full editorial
kkcover1%28rgb%29watermark.jpg
kkmiddle%28rgb%29watermark.jpg
kkcover2%28rgb%29watermark.jpg
KKface%28rgb%29watermark.jpg

Kim wears MIKIMOTO necklaces and earrings, customized dress and vintage gloves throughout

papermag.com
 
Product Details
$10 for issues + $4 handling fee
Limited to 4 issues per household
Ships December 1st

All sales are final, no refunds

This issue is a COLLECTORS ITEM!
Our 2014 Art Issue is an art project in and of itself, in which we explore, deconstruct and obsess over the theme of attention: BREAK THE INTERNET.

Pairing Kim Kardashian with the legendary photographer Jean-Paul Goude was the kickoff. Like it or not, Kardashian is a Hyper-Pop-Culture-Icon-Institution. She understands fame and popularity as if it were coded in her DNA. Goude popped the cork on what makes her an icon: it is not just her ***, but her willingness to give us 100 percent.

EVEN MORE INSIDE THIS CRAZY BREAK THE INTERNET ISSUE:

James Franco hosts #MakeJamesDo, a Google+ Hangout in which he does anything his fans tell him. 0_0. Inside the issue he's created a hunky 32-page selfie calendar. 365 of James, James, James.
The Fat Jew launches his campaign for President of the Internet.
Tim and Eric dress up in the most amazing drag.
Snoop Dogg talks to us about his new career as a painter.
Aubrey Plaza makes prank calls.
Cameron Dallas models like a total stud.
Just about every blogger, Tweeter, YouTuber and Insta-pet create and collaborat with us.
So here it is. If you like it, share it, tweet about it, take a picture of it, tag it (#BreakTheInternet). If you don’t like it, post that too. It will only make us more famous.

Source: papermag.com

I'm sorry guys, but this is just like other fashion magazines. As much as we say MODELS MODELS MODELS on the cover, magazines have to sell and fortunately we have this site so we don't have to buy every issue. This issue is obviously not geared towards fashion at all, only "art" (is this what we're calling it now?) However, I love Kim. Like the statement above, she KNOWS what gets people talking and this thread is a prime example :rolleyes:
 
:shock: Dear God!! How can one unsee this?? Well at least I now know she never had a cesarean, don't know why I even care....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,099
Messages
15,248,896
Members
88,116
Latest member
sorrowfantasy
Back
Top