Photoshop disasters #3 (Major magazines and brands only)

[Benn98]

i can see two ears too.

. Honestly, I swear I only see one ear! This is quite odd. Even after MyFavorite's upload with the drawing of the supposed ear, I still see only one. Just polished my screen and it didn't help.

 

[myown]

^maybe change the lightening of your computer

 

[eizhowa]

I was thinking it was the brightness-setting as well I think newer computers are dimmer though. Old computers are often brighter than new Macs for example.

 

[Naen]

Bruce Weber x Barneys New York

Stephanie's foot...



homotography.tumblr.com

 

[eizhowa]

I am guessing the person doing the retouching was a bit distracted

 

[kokobombon]

^ makes me think that she was leaning against a wall originally and then they photoshoped the boys...

 

[Benn98]

^ makes me think that she was leaning against a wall originally and then they photoshoped the boys...

I think so too! Except the alien foot, look at her second leg, it looks like a pole (eg; thigh and calf looks the same thickness to me) in comparison to the wholesome leg we see in front.

 

[supermodel]

Is it just me or does Stella's waist/legs in this shot from Marie Claire Italia June/July 2015 look disproportionately small in comparison to her upper body?

[modelcouture]

 

[Benn98]

I see it too, and it's not the angle. Otherwise her lower body would've mimicked similar silhouette.

 

[valisere]

That's just her body type.

gotceleb.com instagram/marianovivanco

 

[Benn98]

Could be, and can black can slim her figure even further. But it still looks odd, like it was retouched.

 

[t-rex]

Love Magazine. Poor Julia Nobis lost her arm in the middle of a Bruce Weber shoot:


http://postimage.org/
dnamodels

 

[GivenchyHomme]

^

Her arm looks like an amputee. It's as if she's about to get her revenge on Kaitlin for taking her arm.

 

[Naen]

^
Lool. Exactly my interpretation.
I keep looking, but just can't find any explanation for that ominous picture.

 

[TREVOFASHIONISTO]

yeah bad move on the editors, they usually are supposed to catch those things

 

[Littleathquakes]

either an amputee or one of those deformed limbs. Either way I spent a whole 2 mins trying to picture what her left arm is actually doing in that pic to look that way. Thanks Bruce.

 

[beedonaldson]

Vogue US October 2016 by Annie Leibovitz

vogue

The painting on the right side has been obviously photoshopped in, and no one could be bothered to erase all of it from covering Alicia's hair.

But it's not like Annie + bad photoshop is anything new

 

[Littleathquakes]

I'm more distracted by that paintbrush that seems to just dangle in the air with very little help from her mouth. It's like they just stuck one in there, with the way her mouth doesn't appear to be making any muscles to keep it in place.

 

[beedonaldson]

I'm more distracted by that paintbrush that seems to just dangle in the air with very little help from her mouth. It's like they just stuck one in there, with the way her mouth doesn't appear to be making any muscles to keep it in place.

True! There are no natural shadows around the brush at all.

Here's another, Vanity Fair November 2015 by Annie L. The picture has been edited to look like it's dusk/night, but the people and buildings seen in the doorway weren't significantly darkened with the same blue/green overlay like the rest of the sky/crowd/buildings on the right.

vanity fair

 

[t-rex]

If you Google "Rihanna Cuba" you'll find paparazzi photos of her shoot in Cuba, such as this one:


free pic
scoopnest