I don't think it is I mean truly they should want the top models in prada shows and two of them are Liya and Jaunel IMOMr-Dale said:I think it's just a coincidence...
metal-on-metal said:Wow this thread really crashed and burned, huh. Went from an intelligent discussion to curse words and handbag pictures.
PussyLee said:"Jssy4eva" please don't turn everything into a racial war. You remind me of some people I know. "I scream racism".
Jssy4eva, I think you're IGNORANT and STUP*D, but thats just my two cent, don't bother to reply, waste your time explaining, you already did a lot!
"so what do u define as status???being rich and white"
Why is there a need to put white in there? PRADA is a Status of Luxury as seen by the white/black/asian/latin......
now stop posting!
stylegurrl said:I was reading through this thread and your post stopped me in my tracks. It is one of the most offensive posts I have run across on this board in a while. This thread is not about a racial war. It is about the fact that people of color are often underrepresented in particular fields. In this case the lack of diversity on certain runways is being explored.
In society being white and rich is the exact definition of status. It is for this reason that people of color are usually not used in ad campaign for luxury products. People associate minorities, particularly Black people, with lower economic status, lack of refinement, class etc. All you have to do is look around this board and see how things associated with Black people or urban areas are considered "ghetto", meaning of lower class, therefore undesirable. Also there are designers who may use models of color on the runway but when they have their ads in magazines, White models are used. This is done so that the idea of luxury and status are maintained. I think I remember Marc Jacobs mentioning something about wanting to use a particular Black woman in his ads but he decided against it because he felt his "target audience" would not accept her.
Even people of color have been brainwashed to associate things that are White or European with luxury and status. The example of Asians reacting more favorably to White models is a perfect and very sad example.
I guess it's easy for those who are not people of color here to shrug their shoulders and say, oh, it's a coincidence or it doesn't matter since they are not the ones affected economically or psychologically. They will always see their people represented. I think it would be nice to see my people represented a little more often, especially considering the fact that people of color spend a lot of money on designer goods. My feeling is, if I don't see myself represented by a company then I don't buy their products. They are welcome to have a target audience, if I am not wanted then I will happily spend my money elsewhere.
btw, Martinionrox, I recommend that you spend some time reading about the history of the United States before you make such statements in the future.
completely true...birdofparadise said:lol, i love that, hustle Chanel...is that really true? Products promoted in Asian countries with Asian models don't sell as well?
stylegurrl said:I was reading through this thread and your post stopped me in my tracks. It is one of the most offensive posts I have run across on this board in a while. This thread is not about a racial war. It is about the fact that people of color are often underrepresented in particular fields. In this case the lack of diversity on certain runways is being explored.
In society being white and rich is the exact definition of status. It is for this reason that people of color are usually not used in ad campaign for luxury products. People associate minorities, particularly Black people, with lower economic status, lack of refinement, class etc. All you have to do is look around this board and see how things associated with Black people or urban areas are considered "ghetto", meaning of lower class, therefore undesirable. Also there are designers who may use models of color on the runway but when they have their ads in magazines, White models are used. This is done so that the idea of luxury and status are maintained. I think I remember Marc Jacobs mentioning something about wanting to use a particular Black woman in his ads but he decided against it because he felt his "target audience" would not accept her.
Even people of color have been brainwashed to associate things that are White or European with luxury and status. The example of Asians reacting more favorably to White models is a perfect and very sad example.
I guess it's easy for those who are not people of color here to shrug their shoulders and say, oh, it's a coincidence or it doesn't matter since they are not the ones affected economically or psychologically. They will always see their people represented. I think it would be nice to see my people represented a little more often, especially considering the fact that people of color spend a lot of money on designer goods. My feeling is, if I don't see myself represented by a company then I don't buy their products. They are welcome to have a target audience, if I am not wanted then I will happily spend my money elsewhere.
btw, Martinionrox, I recommend that you spend some time reading about the history of the United States before you make such statements in the future.
stylegurrl said:I was reading through this thread and your post stopped me in my tracks. It is one of the most offensive posts I have run across on this board in a while. This thread is not about a racial war. It is about the fact that people of color are often underrepresented in particular fields. In this case the lack of diversity on certain runways is being explored.
In society being white and rich is the exact definition of status. It is for this reason that people of color are usually not used in ad campaign for luxury products. People associate minorities, particularly Black people, with lower economic status, lack of refinement, class etc. All you have to do is look around this board and see how things associated with Black people or urban areas are considered "ghetto", meaning of lower class, therefore undesirable. Also there are designers who may use models of color on the runway but when they have their ads in magazines, White models are used. This is done so that the idea of luxury and status are maintained. I think I remember Marc Jacobs mentioning something about wanting to use a particular Black woman in his ads but he decided against it because he felt his "target audience" would not accept her.
Even people of color have been brainwashed to associate things that are White or European with luxury and status. The example of Asians reacting more favorably to White models is a perfect and very sad example.
I guess it's easy for those who are not people of color here to shrug their shoulders and say, oh, it's a coincidence or it doesn't matter since they are not the ones affected economically or psychologically. They will always see their people represented. I think it would be nice to see my people represented a little more often, especially considering the fact that people of color spend a lot of money on designer goods. My feeling is, if I don't see myself represented by a company then I don't buy their products. They are welcome to have a target audience, if I am not wanted then I will happily spend my money elsewhere.
btw, Martinionrox, I recommend that you spend some time reading about the history of the United States before you make such statements in the future.
PussyLee said:I'm a person of Color but I was never offended that PRADA never used a person like me to pose for their products. That's their vision and marketing, if you look at diversity then there's Rocawear, Fubu and SeanJohn in the market and everybody's welcome, don't slammed PRADA for their preference in using models.