Thefrenchy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2006
- Messages
- 12,337
- Reaction score
- 3,130
^ Touché
They had for Demna and Vaccarello ahahahI don't even think Kering knows the word empathy.
because they made money almost instantly :-) thats the kering way instant noodle or outThey had for Demna and Vaccarello ahahah
PuckLast week’s news that Kering-owned McQueen was undergoing a strategic business review, likely resulting in a 20 percent staff reduction at its London headquarters, got a lot of people talking. Is Kering C.E.O. Luca de Meo preparing the brand for a sale? After all, the guy has barely been in charge for a month and he’s already effectively sold off the beauty business to L’Oréal in a $4.7 billion deal. Meanwhile, during a recent earnings call, then-deputy C.E.O. Jean-Marc Duplaix acknowledged McQueen’s challenges. (Duplaix also noted that there were no plans to sell, but that was before de Meo took charge.)
Kering has owned a majority stake in the business since 2001, but has yet to scale it meaningfully. Over the years, McQueen has had real commercial hits—including that famous sneaker—but has never managed to maintain the momentum. For what it’s worth, I liked Seán McGirr’s latest collection, and can imagine the customer base with the right merchandising strategy. Alexander McQueen, the house’s late namesake, also remains a public fascination—he’s one of the few designers normal people care about. But de Meo may have his hands full reorganizing Gucci, Saint Laurent, and Bottega Veneta, and perhaps there is a better owner out there.
If they sell McQueen, I don’t see Kering offloading it to a licensing company—the playbook deployed by LVMH in its sale of Marc Jacobs to ABG, which I reported last week. McQueen can sell designer clothes, and the best owner would be a company in that space, like OTB or Richemont. Or maybe private equity. Or maybe they’ll keep it. This is what strategic reviews are for!