Seán McGirr - Designer, Creative Director of Alexander McQueen | Page 21 | the Fashion Spot

Seán McGirr - Designer, Creative Director of Alexander McQueen

McQueen without the theater is Sarah Burton…

Like look at his Givenchy collections. Nobody talks about perfect separates because theyre boring - theres a reason why he never sold a lot. His collections were either really boring Savile
Row standards or completely unwearable craziness.

I tell you I poured over those mens collections trying to buy things and a pair of perfectly tailored duchess matador pants really wasnt the move in 2006… off the top of my head most McQueens pants for men were generally crazy like mary poppins stuff for like people who wear top hats and stuff. It was hard to sort through all the costumey stuff to find actual chic pieces.

Sarahs McQueen Man was so much better because the pants were far better sorted. The McQueen look required like white socks and patent slippers with your matador pants and like a cummerbund with bib and tails. Like ?
 

The Plan for McQueen​

The label founded by Lee Alexander McQueen is ‘not for sale,’ says owner Kering. Instead, the French group is accelerating plans to restructure and reposition the brand after years of losses.

McQueen Spring/Summer 2026.

McQueen is “not for sale,” says owner Kering as it accelerates efforts to restructure and reposition the brand after years of losses. (McQueen)

By
13 November 2025
BoF PROFESSIONAL

Key insights​

  • McQueen is “not for sale,” says owner Kering as it accelerates efforts to restructure and reposition the brand after years of losses.
  • The label will lean into more accessible price points and a younger target customer as it shrinks its retail network, sheds staff and cuts men’s from its runways.
  • According to analyst estimates, annual revenues have fallen below €200 million, far from the more than €800 million the brand generated at its peak.


LONDON — “McQueen is not for sale,” says owner Kering. Instead, the French group is accelerating efforts to restructure and reposition the British brand after years of losses. The moves are part of a three-year roadmap aimed at returning the label to profitability and delivering sustainable growth.

As part of the push, McQueen aims to maintain its luxury image while leaning into more accessible price points, betting that the fearless, non-conformist attitude at the core of the label founded by the late Lee Alexander McQueen will resonate with younger customers who may have previously been priced-out of the brand, according to sources with direct knowledge of the strategy.

McQueen will also shrink its retail network, shed staff and cut men’s from its runway proposition in a bid to adopt a more efficient business model and right-size its operations. The store closures will focus on less strategic markets where the label will transition to a wholesale-led model. The brand will eliminate as many as 55 roles in its UK headquarters, as well as streamlining functions in international markets.

“McQueen has launched a programme aimed at returning the business to sustainable profitability over the next three years,” the brand said in a statement. “This is a cultural, creative and business reset; it’s not just a cost-cutting exercise.”


McQueen began reviewing its business model two years ago.

Going into the 2020 pandemic, the label was Kering’s fastest-growing brand, fuelled by aggressive retail expansion and sales of its hit oversized sneaker. At its peak, the white, thick-soled model drove more than 40 percent of McQueen’s overall revenue, according to people familiar with the matter. But as its popularity gradually cooled, the brand’s overreliance on the product, in part a consequence of its failure to develop a winning handbag, along with dramatic cuts to wholesale distribution, dragged down sales.

In October 2023, Kering hired designer Seán McGirr to replace Sarah Burton, Lee McQueen’s former right hand and successor, who abruptly left the brand the month before. McGirr’s collections have met with a mixed reception from critics and buyers even if Kering flagged improving trends last quarter: “At McQueen, the decline in revenue moderated thanks to higher women’s ready-to-wear sales,” the group said in a statement.

Lee McQueen was a master tailor as well as a bad-boy iconoclast and it’s unclear whether McGirr has what it takes to deliver the intoxicating mix of craft innovation and raw edge that’s core to the brand’s identity, even though more basic items like sneakers and skull scarves drive a large chunk of sales. Key design talent in tailoring and flou has exited the brand this year.

According to analyst estimates, annual revenues have fallen below €200 million, far short of Kering’s one-time ambition to turn McQueen into a billion-euro brand and a major retreat from the more than €800 million the label generated at its peak. Kering does not break out results for its smaller brands, but in a July call with investors, finance chief Armelle Poulou noted that the group’s “Other Houses segment posted a recurring operating loss of €29 million in the first half, largely attributable to McQueen.”

Kering could always change course and offload McQueen. The group has been reviewing its portfolio and recently sold its entire beauty unit to L’Oréal for $4.6 billion. But it’s unclear what the lossmaking McQueen would fetch in the current market and, for now, the company is pushing ahead with a reboot.

Whether it will work remains to be seen.

Major reductions to McQueen’s retail network could pull the brand back into profitability. Meanwhile, customers are thirsty for accessible entry points to luxury fashion after the sharp price hikes of recent years. “There is, at the moment, significant space in the premium market — as high-end brands have increased prices. So, in theory, the opportunity is there,” said Bernstein analyst Luca Solca.


When McQueen “suspended” its McQ diffusion line in 2022 amid a push upmarket, it was cautious about moving those price points into its mainline stores. It may not be too late.

But leaning into lower prices while maintaining the integrity of McQueen’s DNA could prove a tricky balancing act
. Lee McQueen was one of the most revered designers of his generation. “Savage Beauty,” a retrospective of his work at New York’s Met Museum in 2011, the year after his suicide, broke attendance records at the time, a testament to both McQueen’s popular appeal and status as high art.

Industry insiders and fashion fans alike may recoil if his legacy is dumbed down.
 
“Reposition” scares me. Almost always never works upward, downward it’s always perverse.

Of course it’s not far-fetched from the Mcqueen sneakers, but my goodness is this brand never meant to be a ‘lifestyle’ one.
They will likely turn McQueen into a Kenzo. The problem with that model is to not keep a tight distribution.
I don’t think having McQueen at the same price tag as a Victoria Beckham would be a bad idea.

What saves VB is that the offer is very consistent and they are not selling merch. Plus they have a rather exclusive distribution.

They want to go that route? Ok, fine but no skulls scarves, no logo tshirts and sweatshirts. Pure fashion, limited distribution, keep the flagships in big cities.

The other problem is «do they have the right talent for McQueen »?
Does that talent exist somewhere?
 
So so sad and pathetic, Alexander McQueen should have been aimed at competing with Schiaparelli or at least giving it the niche but still commercial appeal of The Row. A cult designer with Anglo-Saxon heritage like Gareth Pugh or even talent like Hussein Chalayan would probably be more appropriate.
 
So so sad and pathetic, Alexander McQueen should have been aimed at competing with Schiaparelli or at least giving it the niche but still commercial appeal of The Row. A cult designer with Anglo-Saxon heritage like Gareth Pugh or even talent like Hussein Chalayan would probably be more appropriate.
Chalayan would clash with Kering.
Does Gareth Pugh has the range?
 
idk they seem to have moved away from skulls. I posted on here I dont wear skulls ever so it was a huge mistake for them to pick such a polarizing symbol and center it. I have passed on countless mcqueen items for literally a decade or more - sunglasses, rtw - bc it had the skull on it. I never had a skull scarf - I dont wear symbols of death and no I dont believe the marketing crap about like infinite life.

If they didnt up and sell the perfumes - a McQueen hit perfume named Atlantis seems like a no brainer must produce - rush to production.
 
If they didnt up and sell the perfumes - a McQueen hit perfume named Atlantis seems like a no brainer must produce - rush to production.
Kering messed up on this one too.
They did fragrances…
Lee launched his fragrance back in 2003 if I remember well. It was called Kingdom with an ambitious bottle. It flopped but then again, I don’t think the brand had a clear identity yet. Lee did another fragrance with an ugly name and bottle.

They could have relaunched the fragrance when Sarah Burton started to have successful collections.
Even when they had the MET exhibition.

Sarah did a line of fragrances but I think it was exclusive and barely advertised.

Some brands always expect a instant hit when sometimes, success comes overtime. They were very dependent on the sneakers.

It’s the same thing at Kering. Over and over again. No creative direction when it comes to fragrances with their partners. CD have more leverage with those smaller brands compared to a huge boat like YSL beauté.
 
Kering messed up on this one too.
They did fragrances…
Lee launched his fragrance back in 2003 if I remember well. It was called Kingdom with an ambitious bottle. It flopped but then again, I don’t think the brand had a clear identity yet. Lee did another fragrance with an ugly name and bottle.

They could have relaunched the fragrance when Sarah Burton started to have successful collections.
Even when they had the MET exhibition.

Sarah did a line of fragrances but I think it was exclusive and barely advertised.

Some brands always expect a instant hit when sometimes, success comes overtime. They were very dependent on the sneakers.

It’s the same thing at Kering. Over and over again. No creative direction when it comes to fragrances with their partners. CD have more leverage with those smaller brands compared to a huge boat like YSL beauté.
mc queen was run like a local mom and pops fish and chips shop, i blame management as much as sarah and the ceo.
too much autopilot and indulgence at the same time i was thinking when i came into contact with the team there.

its sad the brand can and should be bigger and have a special place, to me the dna is solid the story is real and cohesive.
best thing they can do is make it back into a jewel centerpiece with clear foundations based on its founders ideas and dna, and build it up.
its should be the rebel savile row brand to go to with dept of imagination not department store cosplay halloween. its not the brand for this it needs a understanding core audience.

sean is not the guy either i said from day one pre his show he lacks depth and technical skill and vision and ambition to research the brand , mc queen house deserves more than superficial theatrics.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
215,353
Messages
15,298,435
Members
89,318
Latest member
fashiongurlieval
Back
Top