The Devil Wears Prada (2006 Movie) & The Devil Wears Prada 2 (2026 Movie) | Page 16 | the Fashion Spot

The Devil Wears Prada (2006 Movie) & The Devil Wears Prada 2 (2026 Movie)

  • Thread starter Thread starter fashionologie
  • Start date Start date
I just got back from seeing this, it had it's differences from the book, of course. But it was great none the less. I really enjoyed it. :)

But yes, I agree. "Lagerfeld" was probably said more times than I could count on both hands.
 
oolie coco said:
Okay I saw it yesterday and I can't get one thing out of my head!

Well Adrien Grenier,....

But besides him I can't get one thing out of my head!

Right in the very first scene when all the girls are walking up to the Runway building, they show a blonde, and she has the NICEST BROWN LEATHER boots EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What the hell are they? They're sort of piratey or something! With a thick heel! AHhhH!! I love them please help me!

Those nice brown boots were the Chloe Paddington boots from fall 2005. I was excited to see those too because I have them!
 
The opening credit scene was great.

did anyone notice how the other girls..........you could hear their heels (the clackers in the opening scene) but not really hear Anne's.

Interesting.
 
agh i have a new obsession.

I walked out of the theater wanting to throw everything away and find me a sugar daddy :lol:
 
^^ Yeah, I had on tennis shoes and a polo shirt and I felt, kind of ashamed to be seen in public...!!:blush: :cry: (At least until I saw the others coming out of the theatre!!!:lol: )
 
StyleSnob said:
Haha i had to pee SOOOO freakin bad during the movie and so i HAD to run out and back in only to miss the toe ring scene! I got back and she had just gotten out of bed with him........now im curious to see this!!

I left the movie to pee at the exact same spot. :lol:
 
According to vogue.co.uk <<MERYL STREEP insists she didn't base her Devil Wears Prada character on Anna Wintour. Rather, she was inspired by men she has known. "Unfortunately you don't have enough women in power, or at least I don't know them, to copy," she said. Most of my models for this character were male. I know the book was based on an assistant's eye view of Anna Wintour, but it didn't interest me to do a documentary of Anna Wintour. I didn't know anything about her and I only met her at the first benefit. She was a good sport about it. She's been told that I don't resemble her." >> (credits: http://vogue.co.uk/vogue_daily/story/story.asp?stid=36511&date=&sid=) Do I detect a hint of Karl Lagerfeld in Meryl' s character, with all the grey hair, love of furrs and haughty voice? Maybe that also explains the abundance of Chanel clothes in the movie...
 
Alejandro said:
agh i have a new obsession.

I walked out of the theater wanting to throw everything away and find me a sugar daddy :lol:

I know....I'm sad that I couldn't go shopping after seeing it AGAIN today.



:blush:
 
HBoogie said:
I left the movie to pee at the exact same spot. :lol:

Haha im waiting til it comes out on DVD so i can watch it again....Im obviously gonna buy it. ;)
 
The movie turned out to be better than I expected! I loved all the little changes in the movie, like Miranda's divorce plotline which I don't think was introduced in the book. And the ending was so much better than the book, very well done. I can't wait to get the dvd and see the behind the scenes action :woot:
 
US Weekend Box Office
1 Superman Returns $52.2 $84.2
2 The Devil Wears Prada $27.0 $27.0
3 Click $19.4 $77.9
4 Cars $14.0 $182.1
5 Nacho Libre $6.2 $65.0
6 The Lake House $4.5 $38.7
7 The Fast and the Furious $4.4 $51.7
8 Waist Deep $3.3 $15.2
9 The Break-Up $2.8 $110.1
10 The Da Vinci Code $2.3 $209.8
11 X-Men: The Last Stand $2.1 $228.5
12 Garfield: A Tail of Two Kit $2.0 $21.5


Superman Returns Quietly; Prada Saves Box Office

Weekend Box Office Wrap-Up for June 30-July 2, 2006

By John Hamann

July 2, 2006


If you are Warner Bros. and you were bringing back America's best known super hero to the big screen over a long July 4th weekend, where would your expectations lie in terms of box office success? My expectations for the return of Krypton's favorite son were huge - Spider-Man huge – however, once again, through a series of the movie suits' own mistakes, my expectations are ruined. Yes, Superman Returns disappointed this weekend, and it's all the devil's fault – a devil wearing Prada.

Okay, let's get right to it: The number one film of the weekend is, of course, Superman Returns, something that was never really in doubt. The gross for the Friday-to-Sunday portion of the weekend, though, is only $52.2 million, easily $30 million or more below expectations. Superman Returns debuted at a huge 4,065 venues, and had an average of $12,829. The gross since opening on Wednesday sits at $84.2 million, even further away from expectations. You probably already know that Superman got off to a so-so start with a $21 million opening day last Wednesday, an opening similar to The War of the Worlds, and only half that of Spider-Man 2's opening day. The Thursday gross was decent, coming in at about $11 million, still well off the second day of War of the Worlds ($14 million) and less than half of Spider-Man 2. Friday, things got really bad. Analysts expect the Friday gross of a Wednesday opener to at least come close to matching the opening day figure. Superman's Friday gross came in at $16.2 million, several million less than the Wednesday figure. Worse news was that it was well off the War of the Worlds' Friday gross ($21.9 million) and looked quite pedestrian compared to the pedigree of this picture.

I would imagine that at this point, damage control began at Warner Bros., as the Friday figure pretty much sealed the fate of Superman over its opening weekend. The three-day comparisons look like this: War of the Worlds earned $64.9 million over its first Friday-to-Sunday, Batman Begins had a three-day $48.7 million and The Fantastic Four earned $56.1 million. Remember this: Superman Returns has been in the pipe for many, many years. Every year that a film like this is in pre-production, a studio can spend as much as $10 million. If we are kind and say that pre-production lasted four years, and add that to the $260 million production cost, we are looking at a $300 million movie, without marketing costs, a huge number of prints, and other incidentals.

The good news for Warner Bros. is that Superman Returns has grossed $84.2 million since opening last Wednesday (and WB will spin that number very hard and very fast, believe me). The bad news is that this flick doesn't have a lot of momentum. The holiday Monday and Tuesday grosses here will be very important to this franchise. We have to remember that Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest is coming on Friday, and the Johnny Depp movie will demand the larger venues in the nation's movie theatres (especially after Superman's soft opening). The weekend multiplier for Superman Returns came in at about 3.2, which does indicate decent word-of-mouth, but it's also a long weekend, meaning that more folks are available on Sunday night to see a movie. We won't know for certain what Superman's fate will be in 2006 until next weekend, when it faces off against the huge Johnny Depp flick from Disney.

So who is to blame for this mess (a mess that's most likely to only get worse)? It's not director Bryan Singer. He came up with a good film, if you believe the critics. Superman Returns received a huge 182 reviews at RottenTomatoes, and of those, a large 136 were positive, leaving the film with a 75% fresh rating. Sure, that's not the 83% that Batman Begins received, but it is still quite good. The problem here (again, Hollywood, again) is the marketing. Studios have gone cheap on marketing their films, always expecting someone else to do the expensive work for them. If you spend $300 million making your movie, you have to put some sort of effort into inviting people to come. We are not sheep, so please quit expecting us to show up just because you opened the door. Warner Bros. has no one else to blame for this other than themselves. Sure the international gross will pass the basic production budget, but when you are expecting a billion and only get $500 million, someone's going to lose their job.

The good news for exhibitors comes with our runner up film, The Devil Wears Prada, which basically came out of nowhere to save the box office day. The Devil earned a stunning $27 million from only 2,847 venues, giving it a venue average of $9,453 - only a few thousand away from Superman's average. A whole bunch of influential press was drummed up by Fox for The Devil Wears Prada, starting with Meryl Streep's (Oscar-worthy?) performance. It then turned to Anne Hathaway, and towards what a good film this is in general. Prada had big, positive buzz heading into the weekend, something that Superman had, but not to this degree. Prada is the Notting Hill of 2006. Notting Hill opened on May 28, 1999, right in the face of the second weekend of Star Wars: The Phantom Menace, a release date that many analysts thought was a mistake. Against the George Lucas juggernaut (it dropped 21% in its second frame), Notting Hill opened to $21.8 million, which translates to about $26 million in today's dollars, similar to that of Prada. Notting Hill was counter-programming at its finest, a bold move that worked in the face of adversity. The Devil Wears Prada is the same sort of animal -unknown last week, but finishing its debut weekend with an enviable box office start.

Prada reviewed better than Superman, garnering 87 positive reviews out of a possible 112, giving it a 78% fresh rating. For Streep, this is her biggest headlining opening, behind Lemony Snickets' $30 million open in December 2004. For Anne Hathaway, this is another big success; however, this is a transition from youth-oriented films (the two Princess Diaries films opened to $22 million) to more adult fare. The Devil Wears Prada is an early surprise in a summer of lowered expectations. A decent hold next weekend could make this a $100 million film, as this should be the big good news story of the weekend.

Click got switched to off this weekend, as it flailed in the wake of Superman Returns and The Devil Wears Prada. Click grossed $19.4 million over the weekend, off a higher-than-expected 52%. Percentage drops should be somewhat lower this weekend, as many folks have Monday off due to national holidays in the US and Canada, freeing people up on Sunday night more than usual. At this point, Click is most reminiscent of Mr. Deeds, Sandler's 2002 effort that opened to $37 million and lost 50% of its audience in its second frame. Deeds had $73.6 million after two weekends, Click currently sits with $77.9 million against an $80 million budget. Look for the clicking to stop at about $130 million.

Cars rolls into fourth spot this weekend, but the family friendly holiday weekend failed to soften its drop in its fourth frame. Cars earned $14 million this weekend, off 40% from the previous frame when it earned $23.3 million. Cars has now earned $182.1 million domestically, which compares poorly with the other Pixar efforts. Monsters, Inc had earned $192.2 million after four weekends, Finding Nemo $228.5 million, and The Incredibles had grossed $214.3 million.

Jack Black's Nacho Libre slides into fifth spot with a gross of $6.2 million, as it loses some serious steam after a hot opening weekend. The gross over the long weekend equals a drop of 51%, which isn't a good follow-up to last weekend's drop of 55%. Currently, the Paramount pic has grossed $65 million, and should finish with about $85 million in domestic sales.

Sixth spot goes to The Lake House, the romantic drama starring Keanu Reeves and Sandra Bullock. It would seem the The Lake House audience decided to see The Devil Wears Prada this weekend, sticking it to Warner Bros. more than once, as the weeper grossed $4.5 million and fell 49%. Currently, The Lake House has accumulated $38.7 million.

The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift drifted again with another big drop compared to the previous weekend. The Fast and the Furious 3 grossed $4.4 million, off 55% after plunging 59% in its second frame. The Universal flick has now grossed a disappointing $51.7 million.

Waist Deep, last weekend's surprise number five finisher, got punched below the waist this weekend, losing a nasty amount of business. The Rogue Pictures release grossed $3.3 million this weekend (compared to $9.4 million last weekend), giving it a weekend to weekend drop of 65% (remember that drops are supposed to be lower during a long weekend). The gross for the urban thriller now sits at $15.2 million, and will be a memory next weekend.

Two older but successful films finish ninth and tenth. The Break-Up moves a couple of spots down the top ten chart this weekend with a gross of $2.8 million. It drops a huge 57% (thanks to Prada) and now has a cume of $110.1 million. Tenth goes to The Da Vinci Code, which earned $2.3 million. That's a 43% drop for the Ron Howard film, whose domestic gross now sits at $209.8 million and a worldwide total over $700 million.

Overall, thanks mostly to The Devil Wears Prada, the box office is up over last year. In 2005, over the July 1st - 3rd weekend, the top ten movies at the box office earned about $130 million. In 2004, the top ten earned $154 million, thanks to Spider-Man 2. This weekend, the top ten at the box office earned $135.2 million, which puts the total closer to the bad year (2005) than the good year (2004). Things will only get better next weekend, now that there's room for Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest.


http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/column/index.cfm?columnID=9629
 
Avant Garde said:
The movie turned out to be better than I expected! I loved all the little changes in the movie, like Miranda's divorce plotline which I don't think was introduced in the book. And the ending was so much better than the book, very well done. I can't wait to get the dvd and see the behind the scenes action :woot:


I thought the ending was genius!! SPOILER ALERT (kinda?):


I loved how they had Merryl in the towncar at the end, staring out and the final line is her in a bitchy tone telling the driver to : ".........GO!" and thats it. hahaha loved it. :rofl:
 
StyleSnob said:
I thought the ending was genius!! SPOILER ALERT (kinda?):


I loved how they had Merryl in the towncar at the end, staring out and the final line is her in a bitchy tone telling the driver to : ".........GO!" and thats it. hahaha loved it. :rofl:

:lol: I was glad they added the GO part. They didn't end the movie with Miranda being 'reformed', but instead kept her character intact.

At the part where Andrea laughed because she thought the two belts looked similar, (while her coworkers saw them as different) the audience in my theater laughed as to agree with Andrea in seeing the 'frivolity' of the clothes. I guess I didn't agree with the rest of the audience because I thought the belts looked quite different :innocent:
 
I loved the ending too, not expected and almost touching...:blush:
 
Avant Garde said:
:lol: I was glad they added the GO part. They didn't end the movie with Miranda being 'reformed', but instead kept her character intact.

At the part where Andrea laughed because she thought the two belts looked similar, (while her coworkers saw them as different) the audience in my theater laughed as to agree with Andrea in seeing the 'frivolity' of the clothes. I guess I didn't agree with the rest of the audience because I thought the belts looked quite different :innocent:

My theater erputed with laughter too! Hahaha, and I agree...the buckles were distinctly different, and the widths too (if i can remember right?)...fashion amatures! :rolleyes:
 
^^ Who let these people in!!? :lol: I thought the belts were different...and I loved Miranda's little speech about the fashion industry, very nice! When I was walking out, I got the impression that most of the people had no clue what the movie was all about...Several of the funny parts I was the only one who laughted at all...:blush: Not a hip crowd here in South Jersey...:blink:
 
Alright, I just saw it . . .
Read the book a looooong time ago (when it first came out) and didn't like it that much. Too much whining. Sorry, but if I could work at "Vogue" wearing designer clothes from the infamous closet, drinking Starbucks, making contacts and connections- I'd keep my whining on the D.L.
But, I thought the movie was much better than the book. I loved the clothes but too much Chanel and Hermes. I would've liked to see more Chloe, something along those lines.
I don't work in the business, but I thought that it's pretty common to mix low and high end? I guess that would kind of take away the "point" of the movie if they threw in some H&M though. . . Sorry for that ramble, just something I noticed.
And the toe ring? What the??? I never liked toe rings. Ever. So, I was kinda :sick: at that part. That was the only buzz kill for me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

New Posts

Forum Statistics

Threads
214,474
Messages
15,263,096
Members
88,495
Latest member
aparnaappu123
Back
Top