I do agree too. I think the main thing they do share in common is that they all attended the same school,live in the same town and have quiet persona's about themselves...that's really it. Most of the other attributes in their work is mostly because of their schooling-I think that's where many get confused.Originally posted by Orochian@Apr 19th, 2004 - 9:27 am
I agree, Scott. For me Margiela and Demeulemeester are as different as two designers can possibly be (personally I don't care for the former but LURVE the latter), but unfortunately the media do have a tendency to lump different things together and make gross generalizations based on the nationality of designers.
And for people who's knowledge and interest/insight in fashion aren't nearly as keen as the more discerning enthusiasts (like us), they simply wouldn't know any better (nor care
). The terms "Belgian style" and "artisinal chic" have become so overused and cliched they've lost their meaning altogether. For me there isn't a single "Belgain style" - just a group of enormously talented designers, each with distinctive aesthetics, that happen to be from a tiny tiny country B) .
I think it is remarkable though, that such a large body of work has emerged from a place where, just years ago, weren't exactly known for fashion design (or anything that has to do with design, to be quite frank). With the demise of haute couture, and the increasing foreign ownerships and manufacturing of French brands, who knows, may be Paris will continue to lose prominence on the fashion front, eventually to be taken over by Antwerp.![]()
), they simply wouldn't know any better (nor care
). The terms "Belgian style" and "artisinal chic" have become so overused and cliched they've lost their meaning altogether. For me there isn't a single "Belgain style" - just a group of enormously talented designers, each with distinctive aesthetics, that happen to be from a tiny tiny country B) .
I
his Spring 2004 collection.
[/b][/quote]
