The Most You've Ever Spent On A Single Item?

[saad]

i love Bvlgari rings

 

[Diesel21]

It's not so much that I need Chanel girl to prove anything, i just want to see that clothes on a real person, so far I've really only seen runway clothes on celebs and models.

 

[AlexN]

Originally posted by Diesel21@Oct 5 2004, 03:57 PM
It's not so much that I need Chanel girl to prove anything, i just want to see that clothes on a real person, so far I've really only seen runway clothes on celebs and models.

[snapback]386665[/snapback]​

Same here.

 

[fortezza]

a 500$ LV wallet that I later returned because it didn't fit all my things and because it wasn't really worth the money. and a 400$ BCBG coat (birthday present from me to me)

other than that, I spent most of my money on electronics (cameras and my ipod)

 

[themself]

500 dollar LV wallet. Regret it cause it's too fat, and I switched to a Gucci wallet like 3 days later that was like, half the price.

 

[Sephora_Socialite]

Ohh yeah....themself I forgot you're my wallet twin ...

Its a guys wallet but maybe I'm used to girls huge wallets(which I dont like cuz I dont need Bills in there and a checkbook...just cash and credit cards)

I find that wallet small, but perfect size for me....I never tried putting it into my back pocket and sitting on it so maybe you're right.

 

[Meg]

sean I don't think anyone doubts that people can be well off, it's how they are that well off and yet don't have a digital camera. Or how they are that well off working at holt renfrew. and I'm sure Dior doesn't pay THAT well. And money from landholdings? Even combined it doesn't cover the costs of the aforementioned warddrobe. And if people dressed like that at HR-I'm sure people would laugh. It's too ostentatious for day and it's Vancouver.

 

[oanadobre]

Originally posted by Meg@Oct 6 2004, 09:05 AM
sean I don't think anyone doubts that people can be well off, it's how they are that well off and yet don't have a digital camera. Or how they are that well off working at holt renfrew. and I'm sure Dior doesn't pay THAT well. And money from landholdings? Even combined it doesn't cover the costs of the aforementioned warddrobe. And if people dressed like that at HR-I'm sure people would laugh. It's too ostentatious for day and it's Vancouver.

[snapback]387059[/snapback]​

Sorry Chanel_girl, but I agree. And don't take the time to explain us that it's none of our business and you don't have to prove anything. You'll only rise more doubt. At least from me...

 

[Nader]

I honestly don't think she's bluffing... Why the hell would she be lying? She'd get nothing out of lying on the internet of all places. And im sure being a buyer for holt's pays very damn well... especially with this past summer catalog's cover showing off that nice dolce dress

 

[purplelucrezia]

Originally posted by Acid@Oct 5 2004, 08:46 AM
i wish Chanel_girl would post some photos of her in these clothes.....or at least just some photos OF the clothes.......

not just to prove that she has them........but just for us all to swoon over  B)

[snapback]385986[/snapback]​

I have a much better idea. I doubt she'd ever be in the correct circumstances to buy herself a camera... So. Someone ought to pay her a visit.
Oh, and my most expensive item is the same as Prince's.

 

[oanadobre]

Originally posted by purplelucrezia@Oct 6 2004, 11:27 AM
I have a much better idea. I doubt she'd ever be in the correct circumstances to buy herself a camera... So. Someone ought to pay her a visit.

[snapback]387120[/snapback]​

What do you mean about "in the correct circumstances", Purple?

 

[purplelucrezia]

Originally posted by oanadobre@Oct 6 2004, 03:28 AM
What do you mean about "in the correct circumstances", Purple?

[snapback]387121[/snapback]​

I imagine you'd have to ask her that.

 

[oanadobre]

Originally posted by purplelucrezia@Oct 6 2004, 11:31 AM
I imagine you'd have to ask her that.

[snapback]387123[/snapback]​

OK, then...

 

[oanadobre]

Somehow I don't think we'll get our answer soon...

 

[purplelucrezia]

Originally posted by oanadobre@Oct 6 2004, 12:24 PM
Somehow I don't think we'll get our answer soon...

[snapback]387507[/snapback]​

That was particially my point.

 

[oanadobre]

Originally posted by purplelucrezia@Oct 6 2004, 09:08 PM
That was particially my point.

[snapback]387575[/snapback]​

OK, I'm oficially stupid...

 

[purplelucrezia]

Originally posted by oanadobre@Oct 6 2004, 01:09 PM
OK, I'm oficially stupid...

[snapback]387578[/snapback]​

No. I'm just being vague, that's all.

Don't mind me, please...

 

[Honey]

Originally posted by Nader@Oct 6 2004, 03:07 AM
Why the hell would she be lying? She'd get nothing out of lying on the internet of all places.

[snapback]387116[/snapback]​

Self esteem issues. If you can't get the "approval" of those around you in real life, you can always search for it on the internet.

The internet: a place where the poor can be rich, men can be women, the old can be young.... And few would know the difference.

 

[tangerine]

A $700 leather jacket.

BTW, why is everyone on chanel girl's case? Maybe she has the wardrobe, maybe not, does it matter? Even if it is all her fantasy, is that bad? Who is being injured? I don't get all the animosity.

 

[InStyleinNY]

about $1500 for this large cream givenchy pumpkin bag from last season. still love it!

[attachmentid=28332]