i haven't really liked how these actors have been styled I think there are more beautiful choices to pick from -and would look good on them too.. it's a little normal
I think I like it? Kim looks good, I like the grey simplicity of the background/text that allows the image itself to stand out. Have Mert and Marcus done a US GQ cover ever before? I can't think of one off the top of my head, but I guess I don't pay that close attention.
The silly thing about this cover is "as you've never seen her".... um, I've seen the photoshoot on GQ's website and it's definitely nothing new, it's like they're implying a risque photo of Kim is a novelty.
God, naked. Again? I hate the leather jacket thing she's clinging to. If you're going to do it, why not have it be a bed sheet or something, why some ugly, clunky looking screwed up jacket...?
Why not 'as you've never seen her BEFORE!'.....that bothers me. Feels like it's not complete.
Re Kim, the shot looks ok, but I'm over seeing her naked. Is that all she can contribute to culture? Nudity? It's no longer a statement, it's redundancy!
This actually looks really really good! Kim usually delivers when it comes to pictures! It reminds me of Rihanna's GQ cover back in 2012 (RiRi did it better) but I'm surprised this is her first US GQ cover!
I'm soooooo over them saying "like you never seen her before" which is such a sad lie. EVERYONE has seen her naked and shoots like this.
GQ US is beyond idiotic at this point.
And the progression to the bottom never abates.
First all the paparazzi newsstand covers and now the K&J train continues.
I don't know a single person who wants to see KK nude again.
I would much rather have seen Caitlyn instead of this.
Playboy abandoned their nude centerfolds because of lacking sales and GQ keeps shoving it into our faces.
It's so stupid.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.