j'adore_couture
Active Member
- Joined
- May 30, 2009
- Messages
- 1,177
- Reaction score
- 0
^The weight thread will tell you extensively how that, ahem, second picture, is physically impossible to the extent where it just becomes rather comical. 


I totally agree. That's what I have against the plastic look: those who do it brand themselves as the epitome of femininity, and I just don't think that they are. At all. I think they look silly.No offense meant, but for some of us a lot of the plastic looks posted on here are not what some of us consider conventionally and sexually attractive and I do not consider those looks traditionally feminine.
Again - I disagree. I don't that is "conventionally feminine". That doesn't even exist. We all have so different preferences that I don't think it makes sense to talk about conventional in this case...which is why I think the whole plastic look in itself is pretty much failOf course there are many women who wear it very heavy, to the point of looking drag queenish, but generally the "plastic" look just refers to long blonde hair, tanned skin, pink lips, darkened eyes, pink/bronze blush etc, which are all conventionally feminine.

Also that definition seems somewhat culturally biased.I agree with that. We all have different things we find appealing, whether or not we're into high fashion. And I'm brunette. I don't get why specifically long blonde hair would be considered more feminine as opposed to any other hair color or why we would have any reason to feel the need to stick to what some people consider "conventional".Also that definition seems somewhat culturally biased.
PinkGoddess, please credit your images (324) as per tFS guidelines. Thank you![]()

So by saying that long blonde hair + tanned skin + blue eyes etc is considered conventionally feminine, I assume that all asians, blacks, brunettes & redheads who chose not to dye their hair will never have the chance to fall under the look you consider "most feminine". Very ethically and racially biased indeed.